In DOL's last season we were reduced to having Bakke on laon and not being able to afford to keep him on. Anyone arguing other than that MON took over a squad in disarray is either on a wind up or rewriting history to support personal prejudice.
Quote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:01:33 AMIn DOL's last season we were reduced to having Bakke on laon and not being able to afford to keep him on. Anyone arguing other than that MON took over a squad in disarray is either on a wind up or rewriting history to support personal prejudice.I would argue that the disarray between DOL and the chairman before MON took over is very similar to the scenario GH encountered. What we had to spend on players at the end of DOL's reign doesn't come into it because like it or not that squad minus a few faces finished 6th, as did the squad from last season
Quote from: gregnash on May 26, 2011, 11:12:59 AMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:01:33 AMIn DOL's last season we were reduced to having Bakke on laon and not being able to afford to keep him on. Anyone arguing other than that MON took over a squad in disarray is either on a wind up or rewriting history to support personal prejudice.I would argue that the disarray between DOL and the chairman before MON took over is very similar to the scenario GH encountered. What we had to spend on players at the end of DOL's reign doesn't come into it because like it or not that squad minus a few faces finished 6th, as did the squad from last seasonThe sixth place finish sticks out like a sore thumb from what went before and after, in hindsight it was clearly a fluke.
Quote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:01:33 AMIn DOL's last season we were reduced to having Bakke on laon and not being able to afford to keep him on. Anyone arguing other than that MON took over a squad in disarray is either on a wind up or rewriting history to support personal prejudice.Rewriting history? Bakke was injury prone, in fact he was injured when he joined us. Leeds did not want to extend the loan, preferring to sell him. He was also on stupid wages and would have been our highest paid player had we signed him. We rightly sent him back to Leeds.
Quote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:24:35 AMQuote from: gregnash on May 26, 2011, 11:12:59 AMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:01:33 AMIn DOL's last season we were reduced to having Bakke on laon and not being able to afford to keep him on. Anyone arguing other than that MON took over a squad in disarray is either on a wind up or rewriting history to support personal prejudice.I would argue that the disarray between DOL and the chairman before MON took over is very similar to the scenario GH encountered. What we had to spend on players at the end of DOL's reign doesn't come into it because like it or not that squad minus a few faces finished 6th, as did the squad from last seasonThe sixth place finish sticks out like a sore thumb from what went before and after, in hindsight it was clearly a fluke.heh! And i'll think i'll leave it there....
Quote from: gregnash on May 26, 2011, 11:27:38 AMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:24:35 AMQuote from: gregnash on May 26, 2011, 11:12:59 AMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:01:33 AMIn DOL's last season we were reduced to having Bakke on laon and not being able to afford to keep him on. Anyone arguing other than that MON took over a squad in disarray is either on a wind up or rewriting history to support personal prejudice.I would argue that the disarray between DOL and the chairman before MON took over is very similar to the scenario GH encountered. What we had to spend on players at the end of DOL's reign doesn't come into it because like it or not that squad minus a few faces finished 6th, as did the squad from last seasonThe sixth place finish sticks out like a sore thumb from what went before and after, in hindsight it was clearly a fluke.heh! And i'll think i'll leave it there....If you refuse to acknowledge the difference between 3 consecutive league placings and a one off then it's probably best for all concerned that you do.
well i'm not sure how you fluke 38 games but as our last title as well as GT's title challenging side stuck out like sore thumbs too its obviously a common occurance
Quote from: Mark Kelly on May 26, 2011, 11:22:34 AMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:01:33 AMIn DOL's last season we were reduced to having Bakke on laon and not being able to afford to keep him on. Anyone arguing other than that MON took over a squad in disarray is either on a wind up or rewriting history to support personal prejudice.Rewriting history? Bakke was injury prone, in fact he was injured when he joined us. Leeds did not want to extend the loan, preferring to sell him. He was also on stupid wages and would have been our highest paid player had we signed him. We rightly sent him back to Leeds.We didn't try to buy him, Doug turned down the money to extend the loan.
Quote from: gregnash on May 26, 2011, 11:27:38 AMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:24:35 AMQuote from: gregnash on May 26, 2011, 11:12:59 AMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 26, 2011, 11:01:33 AMIn DOL's last season we were reduced to having Bakke on laon and not being able to afford to keep him on. Anyone arguing other than that MON took over a squad in disarray is either on a wind up or rewriting history to support personal prejudice.I would argue that the disarray between DOL and the chairman before MON took over is very similar to the scenario GH encountered. What we had to spend on players at the end of DOL's reign doesn't come into it because like it or not that squad minus a few faces finished 6th, as did the squad from last seasonThe sixth place finish sticks out like a sore thumb from what went before and after, in hindsight it was clearly a fluke.heh! And i'll think i'll leave it there....16th, 6th, 10th, 16th.O'Leary had two top ten finsihes which earned him the chance to another season but he just took us back to where were were before he came.O'Neill took us to sixth and kept us there.You'd have to be a fool to think the two things were comparable.
Quote from: gregnash on May 26, 2011, 11:39:28 AMwell i'm not sure how you fluke 38 games but as our last title as well as GT's title challenging side stuck out like sore thumbs too its obviously a common occuranceI admit defeat here - you've lost me. Exactly what principal of nash-logic are you using this time to prove MON was shit?
Quote from: John M on May 26, 2011, 11:49:30 AMQuote from: gregnash on May 26, 2011, 11:39:28 AMwell i'm not sure how you fluke 38 games but as our last title as well as GT's title challenging side stuck out like sore thumbs too its obviously a common occuranceI admit defeat here - you've lost me. Exactly what principal of nash-logic are you using this time to prove MON was shit?I'm not trying to prove anything about MON John. I'm just pointing out that teams with the same group of players can finish in wildly differing league positions whatever their value on paper.. My amusement at Chris' comments are based on being told DOL's only good season was a fluke by the last guy on here and probably the whole world to adandon the goodship HMS DOL before it finally sunk, and even then had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the lifeboats.I'd imagine on a golf course somewhere a pigfaced irishman has suddenly felt like someone has walked over his grave....