Mons tribunal hearing?

[Mazrim]

What a complete bastard.

[Risso]

I hope they've got the power to imprison him.  A five to ten stretch sounds about right.

[Rico]

I still don't get it! How can a former employee, who seemingly has had his every request catered for, and someone who causes mayhem by walking out on his employer 5 days before thẹ start of thẹ season, taking all of his assistants with him actually take his former employer to a tribunal. Surely it should be thẹ other way round? As a result of his actions I think thẹ club could counter argue that thẹ resulting chaos caused by his departure has not only severely hit our income this season, it will have damaged thẹ image of thẹ club, and possibly effected revenue streams for next season too. In this case, surely AVFC should be counter suing MON for damages that his departure has caused. Like I say, I just don't get it. Hope thẹ outcome of thẹ tribunal will be made public so that we can all see what actually occurred.

[damon loves JT]

Whatever happens, sources close to O'Neill will claim victory. We will have to read between the lines

[CJ]

Very much doubt we'll hear anything - would be surprised if both parties aren't signed up to a confidentiality agreement. 

[Chris Smith]

We will have to read between the lines

We have some world class experts at that on here. Fucking useless at reading the lines themselves but great at seeing implied messages.

[Whiney MacWhineface]

We will have to read between the lines

We have some world class experts at that on here. Fucking useless at reading the lines themselves but great at seeing implied messages.

[Brend'Watkins]

All we know is that MON had a 12 month rolling contract.  If he was sacked at any point in that time we would have to give him a year's salary.  If he walked out he should get nothing but MON isn't stupid so if there is to be a tribunal then it stands to reason that he must have some sort of case and enough of a case to get a tribunal which he must think he stands a chance of winning.   

[Bad English]

Is praying at the altar of the Blessed St Martin the same thing as Mons Veneris? I was never any good at Latin.

[Greg N'Ash]

All we know is that MON had a 12 month rolling contract.  If he was sacked at any point in that time we would have to give him a year's salary.  If he walked out he should get nothing but MON isn't stupid so if there is to be a tribunal then it stands to reason that he must have some sort of case and enough of a case to get a tribunal which he must think he stands a chance of winning.   

think we all know where this is going. "they made me do it ........comments from the general in public....., undermining me.......not allowed to buy shit players until existing shit players were sold blah blah blah......"

[WarszaVillan]

No we don't know this at all. In your little obsessed mind voices maybe be telling you this along with absolute knowledge that he wanted to buy Keane and McGeady.

[Concrete John]

I can see this going to about 80 pages without us ever actually hearing anything new or the actual outcome of the tribunal.

[Merv]

Me too. It will probably conclude with an undisclosed settlement.

[Greg N'Ash]

No we don't know this at all. In your little obsessed mind voices maybe be telling you this along with absolute knowledge that he wanted to buy Keane and McGeady.

erm....if you can think of any other reason you'd take a club to a tribunal after you walked out on them other than constructive dismissal then i'm all ears. Thats not meant to sound sarky by the way.

[Chris Smith]

No we don't know this at all. In your little obsessed mind voices maybe be telling you this along with absolute knowledge that he wanted to buy Keane and McGeady.

erm....if you can think of any other reason you'd take a club to a tribunal after you walked out on them other than constructive dismissal then i'm all ears. Thats not meant to sound sarky by the way.

It's not a formal employment tribunal, which is where a case for constructive dismissal would be heard.

This is a specific LMA hearing to sort out terms of departure when the two sides have been unable to reach agreement.