Quote from: Chico Hamilton III on March 23, 2011, 12:41:47 PMQuotedidn't he quit and get talked round by RL about 6-12 months prior to him going?That was certainly the talk from those in the know at the time.Who knows what happened? maybe the tribunal will flush the truth out?It was on sky that he'd resigned and the club put out an official statement denying it so something clearly happened
Quotedidn't he quit and get talked round by RL about 6-12 months prior to him going?That was certainly the talk from those in the know at the time.Who knows what happened? maybe the tribunal will flush the truth out?
didn't he quit and get talked round by RL about 6-12 months prior to him going?
The General said explicitly, not cryptically, that MON had agreed to the policy of reducing the wage bill at the start of the summer but then just before the fall out had changed his stance. The club had failed to sell the players that they had been trying to and the obvious conclusion is that the manager decided that if we wanted to compete we had to make our signings anyway and Faulkner said no
Quote from: eastie on March 23, 2011, 10:07:55 AMI think mon basically has seen that without being given funds for transfers the club would not progress and therefore decided he couldn't take us on from there- quite understandable in that sense , seems we couldn't move certain players on and reached an impasse, I can see both sides of the story but the timing of his departure was disappointing, had he gone in may it would have been better.Without huge investment no club is going to break the top 4 , and maybe mon wasn't prepared to settle for just top 6?That could have been written by Oliver Holt himself......making MON ambitious the club less so.MON's failing was not getting rid of the shit he signed, getting them off the pay roll. Maybe if he put a bit more effort into this he'd still be here and we'd now be looking to offload MCGeady and Keane in the Summer and get them off the pay roll..
I think mon basically has seen that without being given funds for transfers the club would not progress and therefore decided he couldn't take us on from there- quite understandable in that sense , seems we couldn't move certain players on and reached an impasse, I can see both sides of the story but the timing of his departure was disappointing, had he gone in may it would have been better.Without huge investment no club is going to break the top 4 , and maybe mon wasn't prepared to settle for just top 6?
Yeah its all O'Neill's fault. Ashley Young and James Milner are sh!te.
Quote from: olneythebently on March 23, 2011, 11:53:08 AMIt's not about people speaking up about his record. It's excusing him for the shit he left us in, it's excusing him for the wages he spunked, it's blaming other people for him leaving. I wish he'd stayed, but then he'd decided he couldn't a shit about us. I find it strange how one or two are seemingly still in love with him.I guess it might be that some, such as myself, don't see it as 'being left in the shit'. We had a good squad and are/were capable of much better that what we've seen this season, but the new manager has been a disaster - not his fault.I don't blame anyone for him leaving other than Martin himself, but I do think the full reasons behind what happened are yet to be disclosed.
It's not about people speaking up about his record. It's excusing him for the shit he left us in, it's excusing him for the wages he spunked, it's blaming other people for him leaving. I wish he'd stayed, but then he'd decided he couldn't a shit about us. I find it strange how one or two are seemingly still in love with him.
Quote from: Chris Smith on March 23, 2011, 09:56:06 AMThe General said explicitly, not cryptically, that MON had agreed to the policy of reducing the wage bill at the start of the summer but then just before the fall out had changed his stance. The club had failed to sell the players that they had been trying to and the obvious conclusion is that the manager decided that if we wanted to compete we had to make our signings anyway and Faulkner said noDid the General say that we had failed to sell the players we had been trying to?
I don't blame anyone for him leaving other than Martin himself, but I do think the full reasons behind what happened are yet to be disclosed.
Quote from: John M on March 23, 2011, 11:57:51 AMI guess it might be that some, such as myself, don't see it as 'being left in the shit'. He walked out five days before the season started, taking every member of the first team coaching staff with him. A more exact definition of "being left in the shit" I defy anyone to make.
I guess it might be that some, such as myself, don't see it as 'being left in the shit'.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on March 23, 2011, 12:14:11 PMQuote from: John M on March 23, 2011, 11:57:51 AMI guess it might be that some, such as myself, don't see it as 'being left in the shit'. He walked out five days before the season started, taking every member of the first team coaching staff with him. A more exact definition of "being left in the shit" I defy anyone to make. This is exactly the point of the upcoming tribunal, some people think he left, some think he was forced out i.e constructive dismissal.It will be interesting to hear both sides of the story. So GH has spent £30m in 7 months compared to MONs £70m in 4 years.
Quote from: olneythebently on March 23, 2011, 11:53:08 AMIt's not about people speaking up about his record. It's excusing him for the shit he left us in, it's excusing him for the wages he spunked, it's blaming other people for him leaving. I wish he'd stayed, but then he'd decided he couldn't a shit about us. I find it strange how one or two are seemingly still in love with him.I guess it might be that some, such as myself, don't see it as 'being left in the shit'.
MON has acted with "gross misconduct". If Sky pulled out of showing all the games allocated for the season five days before it started, they would be legally slaughtered ....