Last night it was MONs players that were shite, not GHs.
Quote from: Chris Smith on March 03, 2011, 03:51:33 PMSo, picking a side that you don't agree with is now considered a sackable offence, because if you strip away all the emotive stuff that is all that happened last night. We're turning football into a reality show where fans think that they can vote out the ones they don't like. I realise this is just a typical Chris Smith attempt at being contrary, but do you really think that last night's team selection was acceptable?I don't want him sacked, that would be daft, but I would like a better explanation than a Gallic shrug and some pathetic mumblings about them all being internationals (of Australia, Bulgaria, U-21's, the odd fringe player at a decent country and Emile Fucking Heskey).
So, picking a side that you don't agree with is now considered a sackable offence, because if you strip away all the emotive stuff that is all that happened last night. We're turning football into a reality show where fans think that they can vote out the ones they don't like.
Quote from: Dave Cooper on March 03, 2011, 05:39:57 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on March 03, 2011, 03:51:33 PMSo, picking a side that you don't agree with is now considered a sackable offence, because if you strip away all the emotive stuff that is all that happened last night. We're turning football into a reality show where fans think that they can vote out the ones they don't like. I realise this is just a typical Chris Smith attempt at being contrary, but do you really think that last night's team selection was acceptable?I don't want him sacked, that would be daft, but I would like a better explanation than a Gallic shrug and some pathetic mumblings about them all being internationals (of Australia, Bulgaria, U-21's, the odd fringe player at a decent country and Emile Fucking Heskey). Given the mess he inherited, he's done very well to get some wins
He pick the team he did because he's worried about relegation, you might not think it is that important but he doesn't have that luxury and I am sure his boss has made him aware that it is not an option. I wouldn't have made as many changes myself but he's the manager and he has the right to pick the side he wants. I also understand that if he wants to get a look at Bradley, Bannan, Delph and Herd in first team action then he doesn't have many other chances to take the risk.
Quote from: TimVilla on March 03, 2011, 06:20:31 PMQuote from: Dave Cooper on March 03, 2011, 05:39:57 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on March 03, 2011, 03:51:33 PMSo, picking a side that you don't agree with is now considered a sackable offence, because if you strip away all the emotive stuff that is all that happened last night. We're turning football into a reality show where fans think that they can vote out the ones they don't like. I realise this is just a typical Chris Smith attempt at being contrary, but do you really think that last night's team selection was acceptable?I don't want him sacked, that would be daft, but I would like a better explanation than a Gallic shrug and some pathetic mumblings about them all being internationals (of Australia, Bulgaria, U-21's, the odd fringe player at a decent country and Emile Fucking Heskey). Given the mess he inherited, he's done very well to get some wins Yes, 8 wins in 28 league games, he has done well.
Villa fans wanted their money back , that's why they kept the ball..
Quote from: JUAN PABLO on March 03, 2011, 06:35:39 PMVilla fans wanted their money back , that's why they kept the ball.. Is that why they kept the ball? I thought they were just showing the players how to do it.
Quote from: Monty on March 03, 2011, 07:17:29 PMQuote from: JUAN PABLO on March 03, 2011, 06:35:39 PMVilla fans wanted their money back , that's why they kept the ball.. Is that why they kept the ball? I thought they were just showing the players how to do it.They sent about 8 stewards in to get the balls back, barged lil innocent me rite out the way they did
Quote from: luke25 on March 03, 2011, 07:21:39 PMQuote from: Monty on March 03, 2011, 07:17:29 PMQuote from: JUAN PABLO on March 03, 2011, 06:35:39 PMVilla fans wanted their money back , that's why they kept the ball.. Is that why they kept the ball? I thought they were just showing the players how to do it.They sent about 8 stewards in to get the balls back, barged lil innocent me rite out the way they didIt was funny, in a naughty but I'm fed up type of way, when they showed on the big screen our fans heading the ball to each other.
Quote from: Dave Cooper on March 03, 2011, 05:39:57 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on March 03, 2011, 03:51:33 PMSo, picking a side that you don't agree with is now considered a sackable offence, because if you strip away all the emotive stuff that is all that happened last night. We're turning football into a reality show where fans think that they can vote out the ones they don't like. I realise this is just a typical Chris Smith attempt at being contrary, but do you really think that last night's team selection was acceptable?I don't want him sacked, that would be daft, but I would like a better explanation than a Gallic shrug and some pathetic mumblings about them all being internationals (of Australia, Bulgaria, U-21's, the odd fringe player at a decent country and Emile Fucking Heskey).We don't have a divine right to win the FA Cup, just because we really, really want to. Even if we had beaten Man Citeh last night, we'd still have had Arsenal/Man U in the final. Given the mess he inherited, he's done very well to get some wins but the priority remains the League and not getting relegated. I was fuming about Moscow, but I'm not so upset about last night. Not to say I'm dancing in the street but I can see why he rested players. I'm just pleased to see the likes of Delph & Herd get a chance and not resorting to the likes of Beye & Warnock.
Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.
Author
Topic: Manchester City v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread (Read 108191 times)
