Shame its in Surrey.Mids or East End or Liverpool / Manchester would all have been more understandable locations
Then the future of the game is fucked, see tennis
Quote from: WikiVilla on February 19, 2011, 09:53:19 AMShame its in Surrey.Mids or East End or Liverpool / Manchester would all have been more understandable locationsyes if they were the locations where most junior/ youth football takes place, it isnt though, the next generation of footballers are more likely to be from middle class back grounds and areas
Quote from: hawkeye on February 19, 2011, 11:05:52 PMQuote from: WikiVilla on February 19, 2011, 09:53:19 AMShame its in Surrey.Mids or East End or Liverpool / Manchester would all have been more understandable locationsyes if they were the locations where most junior/ youth football takes place, it isnt though, the next generation of footballers are more likely to be from middle class back grounds and areasWeirdly we probably don't have enough middle-class players. Not that there's anything different or better about them, but it's just sheer maths. The middle class is probably nearing the majority of the country, and yet an overwhelming proportion of players still come from poorer backgrounds. Now, you could say that's because poorer kids are hungrier to succeed, but that doesn't square with the fact that we have by far the lowest proportion of middle-class-born players in the 'big 5' leagues (France being the second lowest). Talent pays no attention to class, so if the largest grouping happens to be middle and yet there aren't many players from that grouping, then football is clearly missing out on some talent.