Quote from: Percy on January 29, 2011, 07:32:45 AMQuote from: Nigel Macdougall on January 28, 2011, 10:11:42 PMQuote from: DBTW on January 28, 2011, 07:52:34 PMIts already been said but Davies was superb with Laursen alongside him, hence starting 34 times that season. Alongside anyone else, he felt he had to cover them too and his own game suffered. I have a really bad feeling, again, that this one will come back to ahunt us. He played 49 League games for us, and we will never oficially know the reson he never made it to 50, but i suspect it was a huge payment to Albion and a bigger percentage increase in salary.This point was once denied on here, by a representive of the board. I did not and will never beleive it !Some of us have short memories:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1217856/Aston-Villa-manager-Martin-ONeill-miffed-Curtis-Davies-agent-comments.htmlYes, I'd entirely forgotten the scatterbrained egomaniac was ever our manager. *wink*
Quote from: Nigel Macdougall on January 28, 2011, 10:11:42 PMQuote from: DBTW on January 28, 2011, 07:52:34 PMIts already been said but Davies was superb with Laursen alongside him, hence starting 34 times that season. Alongside anyone else, he felt he had to cover them too and his own game suffered. I have a really bad feeling, again, that this one will come back to ahunt us. He played 49 League games for us, and we will never oficially know the reson he never made it to 50, but i suspect it was a huge payment to Albion and a bigger percentage increase in salary.This point was once denied on here, by a representive of the board. I did not and will never beleive it !Some of us have short memories:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1217856/Aston-Villa-manager-Martin-ONeill-miffed-Curtis-Davies-agent-comments.html
Quote from: DBTW on January 28, 2011, 07:52:34 PMIts already been said but Davies was superb with Laursen alongside him, hence starting 34 times that season. Alongside anyone else, he felt he had to cover them too and his own game suffered. I have a really bad feeling, again, that this one will come back to ahunt us. He played 49 League games for us, and we will never oficially know the reson he never made it to 50, but i suspect it was a huge payment to Albion and a bigger percentage increase in salary.This point was once denied on here, by a representive of the board. I did not and will never beleive it !
Its already been said but Davies was superb with Laursen alongside him, hence starting 34 times that season. Alongside anyone else, he felt he had to cover them too and his own game suffered. I have a really bad feeling, again, that this one will come back to ahunt us. He played 49 League games for us, and we will never oficially know the reson he never made it to 50, but i suspect it was a huge payment to Albion and a bigger percentage increase in salary.
Quote from: Percy on January 29, 2011, 07:32:45 AMQuote from: Nigel Macdougall on January 28, 2011, 10:11:42 PMQuote from: DBTW on January 28, 2011, 07:52:34 PMIts already been said but Davies was superb with Laursen alongside him, hence starting 34 times that season. Alongside anyone else, he felt he had to cover them too and his own game suffered. I have a really bad feeling, again, that this one will come back to ahunt us. He played 49 League games for us, and we will never oficially know the reson he never made it to 50, but i suspect it was a huge payment to Albion and a bigger percentage increase in salary.This point was once denied on here, by a representive of the board. I did not and will never beleive it !Some of us have short memories:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1217856/Aston-Villa-manager-Martin-ONeill-miffed-Curtis-Davies-agent-comments.htmlI've never doubted the clause didn't exist but the denial that he didn't play anymore games just to avoid the salary increase and payments to West Bromwich Albion !
I think he'll probably do well at Birmingham, he's a good defender when he's on form and McLeish seems to know what he's doing on the defensive side of things. We have much better defenders at the club than him, though, so selling him on seems sensible.Staggering to think how much we paid for him, though. £11,000,000, wasn't it? Mental, really.
I thought the fee was £6m plus Luke Moore or am I talking bollocks?
Quote from: citizenDJ on January 29, 2011, 11:34:53 AMI think he'll probably do well at Birmingham, he's a good defender when he's on form and McLeish seems to know what he's doing on the defensive side of things. We have much better defenders at the club than him, though, so selling him on seems sensible.Staggering to think how much we paid for him, though. £11,000,000, wasn't it? Mental, really.That's gone up quite a bit from the £8.5m that was originally reported.
Quote from: luke25 on January 29, 2011, 11:45:50 AMI thought the fee was £6m plus Luke Moore or am I talking bollocks?I think you're talking bollocks ;-) I pretty sure they were unrelated deals.
I met him once, he seemed a thoroughly nice person. I wish him well (a division or two below us)