English Clubs Ranked by Transfer Record

[Shrek]

spurs paid 18 for Darren Bent, he is still there record signing. This table is a load of rubbish

Ive just checked and wiki are saying 16.5, Paul Hawksbie said 18 million last week so i dont know.

[JUAN PABLO]

Wheres m££££city's  Jo    , he was £18 million and he is shite...

[JUAN PABLO]

 Ramires,  signed for a  £18.2 million deal with Chelsea.

[Clark W Griswold]

spurs paid 18 for Darren Bent, he is still there record signing. This table is a load of rubbish

Ive just checked and wiki are saying 16.5, Paul Hawksbie said 18 million last week so i dont know.

16

Shearer 15
Essien wasn't 35, far less
Torres 23
Rooney 28ish
Milner 26

[Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air]

Its all a long way from when I started watching. We sold Tony Hateley for £100k and re-invested £30k of it to buy John Woodward.


I always said Alf Common was the thin end of the wedge.

[mazrimsbruv]

spurs paid 18 for Darren Bent, he is still there record signing. This table is a load of rubbish

Ive just checked and wiki are saying 16.5, Paul Hawksbie said 18 million last week so i dont know.

How exactly is this table 'a load of rubbish'?

[mazrimsbruv]

Wheres m££££city's  Jo    , he was £18 million and he is shite...

Why would Jo be on the list? Have you read the thread title?

[mazrimsbruv]

Ramires,  signed for a  £18.2 million deal with Chelsea.

And how is that relevant?

[Toronto Villa]

The Darren Bent transfer must be the only in history that is recorded as a fee that includes all possibly add ons. Which I suppose is a good thing as it means we've already won a bunch of stuff. Add on fees are generally based around achievement so I like where fate is taking us with this one.

[WALTERS WARRIORS]

Think "add ons" will be the new way forward. I know it has always existed. But i think a large proportion of the "add on" will be the majority of the fee .......

[Quiet Lion]

Some people apparently fail at reading the op..........