collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce  (Read 31818 times)

Offline alanclare

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2725
  • Age: 87
  • Location: Sutton Coldfield
  • Went to school in Aston
  • GM : 01.12.2025
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #105 on: January 21, 2011, 11:12:27 AM »
From today's Times (their punctuation, not mine):

“My big disappointment, of course, is Gérard Houllier, who up until this time, I still haven’t had a phone call from. I would have thought that out of respect from a manager of his status, a phone call from him to say, ‘Listen Steve, we’re after your centre forward.’ It usually is with the great managers I’ve had the pleasure to deal with in the past.

“I did have the utmost respect from Mr Houllier, but I haven’t had a call. There’s only 20 of us in the Premier League and we all know how hard it is, but I’d have expected a call from him, to have the decency to pick up the phone.”

Offline nodge

  • Member
  • Posts: 1642
  • Location: Bada Bing!
  • GM : 23.02.2024
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #106 on: January 21, 2011, 11:14:00 AM »
Face like a stuntmans knee

Offline JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34346
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #107 on: January 21, 2011, 11:14:42 AM »
I wonder If he made a phone call to Crystal Palace....   

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41470
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #108 on: January 21, 2011, 11:19:57 AM »
I wondered when this was gonna be brought up about Sunderland's attendances? I remembered ready this article with Quinn at the time. It'll be interesting to see if Sunderland spend their money or if they just balance their books. As for attendances I'd have thought the majority of clubs will see attendances fall due to the recession (think it'll only get worse). Has anyone got the PL / FL crowd stats? I wonder what the trend is?
I've just read a post from the General appealing for the fans that can get to matches to get themselves down to Villa Park, which is fair enough. Hopefully we can regain our momentum and just as importantly start winning and entertaining at home. Our performances at Villa Park have generally been dull for years and the fans deserve credit for turning up in their numbers. If we can finally get it right at home between now and the end of the season, even with the economic climate, we should see an upturn in attendances and a queue to renew season tickets in the summer.

Offline gerags

  • Member
  • Posts: 3530
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #109 on: January 21, 2011, 11:22:16 AM »
A fair number of Mackems fans think Brucie is talking shite.

 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=561290

And some dont...

Because Villa are now a devious club.
That's probably the reason why MON walked out as he wouldnt have anything to do with underhand transfer tactics. In my opinion he walked out around the time that they started tapping bent up.

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41470
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #110 on: January 21, 2011, 11:25:11 AM »
A fair number of Mackems fans think Brucie is talking shite.

 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=561290

And some dont...

Because Villa are now a devious club.
That's probably the reason why MON walked out as he wouldnt have anything to do with underhand transfer tactics. In my opinion he walked out around the time that they started tapping bent up.
They all love MON because he's a Sunderland supporter.

Offline Lambert and Payne

  • Member
  • Posts: 3090
  • Age: 33
  • GM : Sep, 2012
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #111 on: January 21, 2011, 12:23:34 PM »
A fair number of Mackems fans think Brucie is talking shite.

 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=561290

And some dont...

Because Villa are now a devious club.
That's probably the reason why MON walked out as he wouldnt have anything to do with underhand transfer tactics. In my opinion he walked out around the time that they started tapping bent up.


That was the funniest quote on there! Haaa!! In all seriousness, some of them had the right idea, what could Houllier say? Thanks for selling us Bent. What else is there to say, particuarly after they accused us of underhand tactics!

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #112 on: January 21, 2011, 12:31:21 PM »
Steve Bruce. A man with a face like Miss Marple's minge.

Offline Markerton

  • Member
  • Posts: 36
  • Age: 2021
  • Location: Warwickshire
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #113 on: January 21, 2011, 12:44:20 PM »
Personal favourite quote from the Mackems:

Quote from: AnotherMag
If your going for a clubs top player you don't speak to a manager ffs!!!! As they wont want to sell them. You go to the man who said in December he would accept a ridiculous offer for any player at Sunderland.

Too true.

Now-a-days, you can't phone someone up and say:

"Yeah, can I buy your best player who has scored pretty much all your goals for the past 18 months?"

The reason being that there'd be no f****** transfers. It's not like we offered them £3m plus a multipack of Wotsits, is it? We paid a fair price, we didn't "tap him up", we went doing it the way anyone else would have. It just so happened that he was unhappy at Sunderland and we pounced on him.

F*** all the media, f*** Steve Bruce (the hypocritical c****), and f*** the Sunderland supporters sending the poor lad threats.

Offline Lambert and Payne

  • Member
  • Posts: 3090
  • Age: 33
  • GM : Sep, 2012
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #114 on: January 21, 2011, 12:49:46 PM »
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/article5594062.ece

Interesting read... Even if a few years old. Wonder what Sunderland fans thought of this back then...

Offline Markerton

  • Member
  • Posts: 36
  • Age: 2021
  • Location: Warwickshire
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #115 on: January 21, 2011, 12:53:14 PM »
They didn't have newspaper in Sunderland 12 months ago.

They'd only just got running water.

Offline koreanmeatballs

  • Member
  • Posts: 148
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #116 on: January 21, 2011, 01:34:15 PM »
I wouldn't be surprised if Houllier is rounded on more by other managers in the league. (I hate the bloke but...)

Houllier and Wenger are good mate's aren't they?
Wenger is hated by most other managers in the league, he doesn't drink with them after games or some bull and keeps himself to himself.
The rest of the boys (Sir Alex fan club) club like Ferguson, Bruce, Hughes, Allardyce (When he was kicking about), Pulis, Pardew and new addition Holloway at some point have had a go and Wenger. Also  Arsenal fans are always moaning about Wenger's treatment in the press.

So I wouldn't be surprised if we see a lot more managers and press having digs at Houllier through his connection with Arsene 'Overall, I believe' Wenger.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74612
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #117 on: January 21, 2011, 01:46:36 PM »
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/article5594062.ece

Interesting read... Even if a few years old. Wonder what Sunderland fans thought of this back then...

I just read that, and it is staggering to see the hypocrisy.

Here's the entire article for those not arsed to click.

Quote
Harry Redknapp accused Sunderland of double standards last night over their attempts to sign Darren Bent. The Tottenham Hotspur manager reacted angrily to Sunderland's charge that the North London club had led a concerted attempt to unsettle Kenwyne Jones by alleging that the Wearside club had pursued their interest in Bent without Spurs' knowledge and approval.

Tottenham, who entertain Stoke City at White Hart Lane tonight, had offered Bent in part exchange for Jones, the Trinidad & Tobago striker, during discussions between the clubs two weeks ago, but the deal appeared to have died when Sunderland insisted that Jones was not for sale. However, Redknapp claimed that Sunderland have been speaking to Bent's representatives about a possible transfer, after being told so by the forward.

“Darren came to see me to say, ‘I hear Sunderland want me, what do you know?'” Redknapp said. “I said, ‘I haven't spoken to anyone and if they are interested they will have to ring the chairman.' He said, ‘Well, my agent says they want me.' So someone is talking to someone. I could say they [Sunderland] have done the same thing to Darren Bent because his agent has obviously been talking to someone at Sunderland to know they are interested. So if they are mentioning Darren Bent, why are they mentioning Darren Bent? Is someone upsetting Darren Bent?”


The wrangle will strain further Redknapp's relationship with Bent, who was angered when his manager joked that his wife could have scored with the kind of free header that the striker missed against Portsmouth nine days ago.

Redknapp said that the club were encouraged to show interest in Jones because Sunderland had sent out mixed signals about the player's future. Tottenham were reported to have been prepared to pay £15 million for the player, who had moved from Southampton to Sunderland for £6million at the beginning of last season, but that deal appears to be dead. “Last night he [Daniel Levy, the Tottenham chairman] thought that Jones had signed a new contract at Sunderland, so I think the deal's off,” Redknapp said.

Responding to suggestions that Spurs had sought to unsettle Jones, Redknapp said that there had been discussions about a deal between the two chairmen. “I don't know why Niall Quinn is talking to Daniel if they don't want to sell him,” Redknapp said. “Why do you talk to someone if you don't want to sell someone?”

Jones is among a number of forwards whom Tottenham have tried unsuccessfully to sign, with the club drawing a blank in their efforts to lure Carlton Cole and Craig Bellamy to White Hart Lane.

Redknapp remains keen on Fred, the Brazil striker, whose agents have claimed that Tottenham have offered the player a 4-year contract worth £50,000 a week to sign from Lyons. The French side hope to receive £8million, with clubs in Spain interested, despite him being out of contract this summer.

Tottenham have, however, signed Pascal Chimbonda, the full back, from Sunderland and Carlo Cudicini, the goalkeeper, on a free transfer from Chelsea yesterday. Cudicini could make his debut against Stoke this evening because Heurelho Gomes is a doubt with a thigh injury. Chimbonda was not registered in time to play and Wilson Palacios, the midfield player who joined from Wigan Athletic last week, is suspended.

Stoke have used a four-day training camp in Dubai to integrate James Beattie, the forward, and Matthew Etherington, the former Tottenham left winger, who were signed this month. Both clubs are among the five teams languishing on 21 points at the foot of the table.


Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31066
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #118 on: January 21, 2011, 01:57:17 PM »
Just seen Houllier on SSN. Brilliant. Could hardly stop himself chuckling about the comments from Bruce. Never seen a manager, especially under pressure, look so bloody relaxed as Gerard at the moment.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74612
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The hypocrisy of Steve Bruce
« Reply #119 on: January 21, 2011, 01:58:20 PM »
Just seen Houllier on SSN. Brilliant. Could hardly stop himself chuckling about the comments from Bruce. Never seen a manager, especially under pressure, look so bloody relaxed as Gerard at the moment.

It looked very clearly like he was saying Quinn didn't tell Bruce what they were negotiating, and that they were selling Bent behind his back

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal