Just remember: when they are critical of the Villa it is "lazy, incompetent journalism written by an alcoholic twat who has supported variously ManYoo, the dippers, The Arse or those blue c***s in Lahndan". if they praise the Villa it is a "great article, that".
Villa prospered under O'Neill because they ground out results against the bottom 14 teams with great consistancy, despite not - to my mind - having very much in the way of flair to distinguish themselves from the also-rans.
Quote from: Bad English on January 09, 2011, 05:02:38 PMJust remember: when they are critical of the Villa it is "lazy, incompetent journalism written by an alcoholic twat who has supported variously ManYoo, the dippers, The Arse or those blue c***s in Lahndan". if they praise the Villa it is a "great article, that".Maybe so, but is Rod Littlecock correct in saying that MON had 'scant resources' ?No
Quote from: CorkVilla on January 09, 2011, 04:54:31 PMVilla prospered under O'Neill because they ground out results against the bottom 14 teams with great consistancy, despite not - to my mind - having very much in the way of flair to distinguish themselves from the also-rans.I seem to remember Villa taking 4pts off Manyoo last season, 3pts off Chelsea and Liverpool, and a couple off Spurz.This guy isn't very knowledgeable about Villa, is he?
Quote from: Rip van Fletcher on January 09, 2011, 05:04:49 PMQuote from: Bad English on January 09, 2011, 05:02:38 PMJust remember: when they are critical of the Villa it is "lazy, incompetent journalism written by an alcoholic twat who has supported variously ManYoo, the dippers, The Arse or those blue c***s in Lahndan". if they praise the Villa it is a "great article, that".Maybe so, but is Rod Littlecock correct in saying that MON had 'scant resources' ?NoCompared to the rest of the top 6? Yes.