But if the club have signed a deal in principle with Man City, and Milner had signed his deal at Wastelands too it couldn't have been cancelled could it.
as offers have said, the whole milner deal would have collapsed. Citeh wouldn't have offered us cash instead and another player would have had the same drawbacks as Ireland. They were between a rock and a hard place because of the manager leaving
Quote from: gregnash on December 19, 2010, 12:31:22 PMas offers have said, the whole milner deal would have collapsed. Citeh wouldn't have offered us cash instead and another player would have had the same drawbacks as Ireland. They were between a rock and a hard place because of the manager leavingYou can't possible know what Man City would or wouldn't offer although their pursuit of Lescott shows what they are capable of when they want a player. There are plenty of reasons why the club wanted to do the deal but I just don't buy the idea that they had no alternative but to take Ireland.Why would the deal collapsing have been so bad? As I said the manager walking out gave them the perfect excuse but they chose not to take it.
well lets say it had collapsed. You'd have milner who as far as he's concerned, has signed for Citeh and was waiting for Ireland to tie up his end. He's already spent his first 80k weekly wage in his mind and now he's been told to head back to Villa Park. Now that's gonna be a headfuck for any player and he's not going to be particurly sympathetic to the club. The best case scenario is he would have stayed under sufferance till January and gone to Citeh for less or seen out his contract in spite.
oh come on dave, you know how these things work. Its like when Barry stayed. A poor game from him and this place was full of "bugger off to liverpool" posts. If Milner really had signed a deal to join Citeh then even given his professionalism i think he would have struggled
Quote from: gregnash on December 19, 2010, 01:54:52 PMoh come on dave, you know how these things work. Its like when Barry stayed. A poor game from him and this place was full of "bugger off to liverpool" posts. If Milner really had signed a deal to join Citeh then even given his professionalism i think he would have struggledWasn't Barry pretty damn good that season, in spite of the occasional dimwitted post on a message board? Again, possibly not one of your better examples.All I'm saying is the previous time the scenario arose in Milner's career, your vision of doom and despair didn't come to pass. He just got on with things.
Quote from: Dave on December 19, 2010, 02:05:57 PMQuote from: gregnash on December 19, 2010, 01:54:52 PMoh come on dave, you know how these things work. Its like when Barry stayed. A poor game from him and this place was full of "bugger off to liverpool" posts. If Milner really had signed a deal to join Citeh then even given his professionalism i think he would have struggledWasn't Barry pretty damn good that season, in spite of the occasional dimwitted post on a message board? Again, possibly not one of your better examples.All I'm saying is the previous time the scenario arose in Milner's career, your vision of doom and despair didn't come to pass. He just got on with things.he still left as soon as he could. Anyway the manager wanted to keep him. Its pretty obvious that MON wanted rid of milner and helped instigate the whole situation by his public comments. Given that situation, i believe Milner would be a bit pissed to say the least if the deal was pulled at the 11th hour
thats the opinion i get, probably to fund his spending. Go back to Pelty's post on page 11 where he talks about certain comments MON gave to the press that made Milner's position untenable. If they're the ones i'm thinking of, Milner hotly denied them at the time and was reportably furious with MON