You're missing my point though. Nobody has come in for him. There must be a reason for this.Chris Sutton and Didier Agathe anyone?Just because they were once good, doesn't mean they're still going to be.Gary MacAllister would probably have signed for someone else if not Liverpool.More players yes, but not for the sake of it.If he's still good enough, then fine.
At 37 I wouldn't be expecting too much from him as a player, but the idea of him joining the coaching staff does sound a good one to me!
I thought Sutton was relatively useful in that short spell with us.
Quote from: John M on November 16, 2010, 11:52:51 AMI thought Sutton was relatively useful in that short spell with us.Scored the winner at Everton and caused defences a few problems.
Quote from: 8 Ace Fletcher on November 16, 2010, 11:53:44 AMQuote from: John M on November 16, 2010, 11:52:51 AMI thought Sutton was relatively useful in that short spell with us.Scored the winner at Everton and caused defences a few problems.Great goal. Set up by a peach of pass by our new upcoming star midfielder
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on November 16, 2010, 10:59:11 AMQuote from: Can Carew Be Bothered!?!? on November 16, 2010, 10:51:04 AMIf signing him means a young player misses out, then we shouldn't sign him.Nobody else has signed him for a reason.You're missing the point, which is:Quote from: Billy Walker on November 16, 2010, 10:57:34 AMI hope Houllier would be thinking of signing Pires for the same reasons that he signed McAllister for Liverpool: he'd be an older, wiser head for the youngsters to learn from. If so, I reckon it would be a shrewd move... and also the fact that with the way our injuries are going, we desperately need bodies, and quickly.You're missing my point though. Nobody has come in for him. There must be a reason for this.Chris Sutton and Didier Agathe anyone?Just because they were once good, doesn't mean they're still going to be.Gary MacAllister would probably have signed for someone else if not Liverpool.More players yes, but not for the sake of it.If he's still good enough, then fine.
Quote from: Can Carew Be Bothered!?!? on November 16, 2010, 10:51:04 AMIf signing him means a young player misses out, then we shouldn't sign him.Nobody else has signed him for a reason.You're missing the point, which is:Quote from: Billy Walker on November 16, 2010, 10:57:34 AMI hope Houllier would be thinking of signing Pires for the same reasons that he signed McAllister for Liverpool: he'd be an older, wiser head for the youngsters to learn from. If so, I reckon it would be a shrewd move... and also the fact that with the way our injuries are going, we desperately need bodies, and quickly.
If signing him means a young player misses out, then we shouldn't sign him.Nobody else has signed him for a reason.
I hope Houllier would be thinking of signing Pires for the same reasons that he signed McAllister for Liverpool: he'd be an older, wiser head for the youngsters to learn from. If so, I reckon it would be a shrewd move.
Quote from: Can Carew Be Bothered!?!? on November 16, 2010, 11:39:17 AMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on November 16, 2010, 10:59:11 AMQuote from: Can Carew Be Bothered!?!? on November 16, 2010, 10:51:04 AMIf signing him means a young player misses out, then we shouldn't sign him.Nobody else has signed him for a reason.You're missing the point, which is:Quote from: Billy Walker on November 16, 2010, 10:57:34 AMI hope Houllier would be thinking of signing Pires for the same reasons that he signed McAllister for Liverpool: he'd be an older, wiser head for the youngsters to learn from. If so, I reckon it would be a shrewd move... and also the fact that with the way our injuries are going, we desperately need bodies, and quickly.You're missing my point though. Nobody has come in for him. There must be a reason for this.Chris Sutton and Didier Agathe anyone?Just because they were once good, doesn't mean they're still going to be.Gary MacAllister would probably have signed for someone else if not Liverpool.More players yes, but not for the sake of it.If he's still good enough, then fine.Your point doesn't add up. Everbody wanted to sign downing before his injury, we then bought him injured. Nobody wanted Adam Johnson then for half the money, that doesn't mean he is rubbish does it?
If he's not on big wages I can't see it being a problem. With all due respect I imagine a 37 year old Robert Pires is a considerably better option to have on the bench than a 22 year old Isiah Osbourne.