collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by LeeS
[Today at 11:47:32 AM]


FFP by LeeS
[Today at 11:44:38 AM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by paul_e
[Today at 11:36:35 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Drummond
[Today at 11:24:06 AM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Richard
[Today at 11:05:39 AM]


Unai Emery by Drummond
[Today at 10:33:57 AM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 10:30:17 AM]


The week in claret and blue by ROBBO
[Today at 03:13:05 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday  (Read 12660 times)

Offline JJ-AV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9467
  • GM : 26.07.2022
Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« on: November 14, 2010, 11:48:58 AM »
Talking about MON's departure now.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2010, 11:49:42 AM »
What did they say?

Offline MonsXI

  • Member
  • Posts: 1071
  • Location: exiled down the a45
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2010, 11:54:16 AM »
What did they say?

Said they knew nothing about MON leaving until turning on the tv, no players were celebrating.

Also laughed at the article about him starting a revolt because of GH taking over.

Spoke really well of the club.

Offline JJ-AV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9467
  • GM : 26.07.2022
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2010, 11:54:38 AM »
Nothing interesting really, Friedel was saying how it was a shock and all the talk of arguments within the camp were compeltely untrue and the players weren't happy.
Said he hadn't spoken to him pre-departure and gave the impression none of the players suspected it.

Laursen just said 'I can't take Manchester City seriously'. Quality.

Offline Saunders9

  • Member
  • Posts: 184
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2010, 11:55:30 AM »
"I cannot take Manchester City seriously" - Martin Laursen 14/11/10 - Legend!

Offline villan1975

  • Member
  • Posts: 827
  • Age: 50
  • Location: Hereford
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2010, 11:58:25 AM »
get in there martin,class act all the way!!!!!!

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10107
  • Location: Peckham
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2010, 11:59:38 AM »
Friedel is an experienced guy, even if there was arguments etc behind the scenes with MON or a revolt against GH coming in, he'd hardly admit to it on the TV, would he?

Offline richard moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 12029
  • Location: Chichester, West Sussex
  • GM : Jan, 2013
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2010, 12:17:05 PM »
"I cannot take Manchester City seriously" - Martin Laursen 14/11/10 - Legend!

Excellent, top man, nor can I, like some sort of grotesque circus act with a manager who is a grade A pratt....

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43906
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2010, 12:21:37 PM »
"I cannot take Manchester City seriously" - Martin Laursen 14/11/10 - Legend!

Excellent, top man, nor can I, like some sort of grotesque circus act with a manager who is a grade A pratt....

and did Barry  get booed yesterday when he came on for Tevez?

Online AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12382
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2010, 12:22:29 PM »
Nope they were booing Mancini for subbing Tevez.

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36462
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2010, 12:28:29 PM »
Friedel is an experienced guy, even if there was arguments etc behind the scenes with MON or a revolt against GH coming in, he'd hardly admit to it on the TV, would he?

Or, perhaps the reason he said there weren't arguments and no revolt was because it is the truth. Have you considered that outlandish possibility?


Offline JJ-AV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9467
  • GM : 26.07.2022
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2010, 12:55:46 PM »
Laursen: wouldn't say no to coming back to Villa one day and one day might go into management.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55307
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2010, 01:04:14 PM »
Friedel talked about the promise of the youngsters. They both seemed like really good guys.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58629
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2010, 01:24:13 PM »
Friedel is an experienced guy, even if there was arguments etc behind the scenes with MON or a revolt against GH coming in, he'd hardly admit to it on the TV, would he?

Or, perhaps the reason he said there weren't arguments and no revolt was because it is the truth. Have you considered that outlandish possibility?



I would imagine that privately some players were very happy, and others might have been shocked/upset. MON's selection policy will have polarized the camp, and I think I've heard Laursen even suggest that in an earlier interview. One would assume that you would be quite happy to see the back of him if you were Davies, Sidwell, Reo-Coker etc, even if it is a bit far fetched to suggest they openly popped corks.

Offline sfx412

  • Member
  • Posts: 2337
Re: Friedel and Laursen on Goals on Sunday
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2010, 01:32:10 PM »
Friedel is an experienced guy, even if there was arguments etc behind the scenes with MON or a revolt against GH coming in, he'd hardly admit to it on the TV, would he?

Or, perhaps the reason he said there weren't arguments and no revolt was because it is the truth. Have you considered that outlandish possibility?


   

He's probably got more sense like most of us

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal