Quote from: hilts_coolerking on November 13, 2010, 03:07:02 PMQuote from: Summers on November 13, 2010, 03:03:18 PMNani shoulda been off, for premeditated violent conduct. Brown off for the penalty. But hey, it IS Man Utd.I agree about Nani. There was another defender around for the pen so I don't think it was a sending off. Vidic I don't care about; the damage was done by then.Admittedly is kind of irrelevant once Vidic scores but the fact remains he had only just booked Young for doing the same thing. There is no justification for it. Refs never seem to make these big decisions in favour of Man Utd - certainly not when they're playing us.
Quote from: Summers on November 13, 2010, 03:03:18 PMNani shoulda been off, for premeditated violent conduct. Brown off for the penalty. But hey, it IS Man Utd.I agree about Nani. There was another defender around for the pen so I don't think it was a sending off. Vidic I don't care about; the damage was done by then.
Nani shoulda been off, for premeditated violent conduct. Brown off for the penalty. But hey, it IS Man Utd.
Quote from: toronto villa on November 13, 2010, 03:06:10 PMHilts, your post was clear aimed at shit stirring. Your posts are no different to mine if you want to talk about balance. I'm not OTT positive, and you're not OTT negative, but we both approach things differently. I don't comment on the numerous times you've been negative on a situation, because it doesn't matter. You're entitled to your opinion and so am I. I don't comment on your negativity so give it a rest trying to point out whether I offer a balanced view on a subject.No, it really wasn't. You're right though about being entitled to our opinions; but that also applies to Blackcountry Villa, however much you might disagree with him.
Hilts, your post was clear aimed at shit stirring. Your posts are no different to mine if you want to talk about balance. I'm not OTT positive, and you're not OTT negative, but we both approach things differently. I don't comment on the numerous times you've been negative on a situation, because it doesn't matter. You're entitled to your opinion and so am I. I don't comment on your negativity so give it a rest trying to point out whether I offer a balanced view on a subject.
I agree, but there's a difference between agreeing or disagreeing with a post and having to comment on whether somebody else is balanced or not. You're post had nothing to with the original post, or whether or not you disagreed with my retort did it? Feel free to defend his opinion or support the contrary but that wasn't your objective.
Quote from: toronto villa on November 13, 2010, 03:13:14 PMI agree, but there's a difference between agreeing or disagreeing with a post and having to comment on whether somebody else is balanced or not. You're post had nothing to with the original post, or whether or not you disagreed with my retort did it? Feel free to defend his opinion or support the contrary but that wasn't your objective.But that's exactly what you did to his post! Twice!"It must make you so happy inside to always see the most negative aspect of everything we do.""I truly hate meaningless uneducated posts from people who don't understand balance."In any event, I did comment on Blackcountry Villa's original post, in that I agreed with you it was OTT. Please don't presume to tell me what my objective was.
Will we EVER beat ManUre
You've missed the point. Balance doesn't have to mean opinions that are always right down the middle. That post was over the top and had no comment whatsover on the postives of today's game. Like I said, you look for opportunities to create controversy.
Great second half performance and grew in confidence. How many times did we hit the woodwork? I know people will say results are everything but how much better was this than the 1-0 against Everton.