Quote from: Can Carew Be Bothered!?!? on August 27, 2010, 01:27:04 PMIn my opinion, Petrov has always been shit.Contratulations, you've more or less admitted you don't actually understand how football works.
In my opinion, Petrov has always been shit.
Quote from: Dave on August 27, 2010, 06:40:47 PMQuote from: Can Carew Be Bothered!?!? on August 27, 2010, 01:27:04 PMIn my opinion, Petrov has always been shit.Contratulations, you've more or less admitted you don't actually understand how football works.Why, because you don't agree? I know plenty of people who do not, and have not, ever rated Petrov.
I know that what Petrov does, he has done well for the past couple of years. But it's a bit like using a Ferrari to do a paper round. He was bought to do a lot more than pass ten yards sideways.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on August 28, 2010, 09:52:55 PMI know that what Petrov does, he has done well for the past couple of years. But it's a bit like using a Ferrari to do a paper round. He was bought to do a lot more than pass ten yards sideways. Barcelona have just spent £18m on a player who does a very similar job, minus the vision and the passing ability. We did buy him to be more attacking, but we bought Gareth Barry to be a left-sided defender, James Milner to be a right-midfielder and Dwight Yorke to be a winger. Just because their best performances for us weren't in the position we thought they would be doesn't mean they weren't valuable.I really believe that if Petrov were 25 rather than 31 then we would have clubs queuing up for him at the moment.
But he isn't, and we haven't. He's been an okayish defensive midfielder when we bought him to be a matchwinner.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on August 28, 2010, 10:10:51 PMBut he isn't, and we haven't. He's been an okayish defensive midfielder when we bought him to be a matchwinner. As I said, I don't think it matters what we bought him to be. We bought Reo-Coker to be a defensive midfielder and it turned out that an attacking player that we bought for less money was far better at it than he was. So we put Petrov there and bought better players to do the attacking instead.As for 'okayish', he plays in a position that it's more or less impossible to stand out. As I said in an earlier post, the fact that that we had a very decent defensive record last season in spite of the fact that we had just Petrov doing the job that some teams pick three players to perform suggest that he was doing that job very well.
Quote from: Dave on August 28, 2010, 10:15:28 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on August 28, 2010, 10:10:51 PMBut he isn't, and we haven't. He's been an okayish defensive midfielder when we bought him to be a matchwinner. As I said, I don't think it matters what we bought him to be. We bought Reo-Coker to be a defensive midfielder and it turned out that an attacking player that we bought for less money was far better at it than he was. So we put Petrov there and bought better players to do the attacking instead.As for 'okayish', he plays in a position that it's more or less impossible to stand out. As I said in an earlier post, the fact that that we had a very decent defensive record last season in spite of the fact that we had just Petrov doing the job that some teams pick three players to perform suggest that he was doing that job very well.Doing the job of three players? I really don't think so.
Petrov gets an awful lot of stick considering how good a player he is.