I think the majority of Villa fans think the same way, they have a lot of respect for KMac and want him at the club, but not as Manager.If Randy & Co. appoint him, I think it will be a decision based on lack of alternatives who are in budget and available.'In budget' is not just his salary package, it also includes the ( I would guess, verbally demonstrable) abililty to manage on a shoestring.
Quote from: Chris Smith on September 01, 2010, 11:41:43 AMIf the decision is to go with Kevin then I think, as has been touched on before, he's going to need a bit of help. It's all very well having the player here like him and being a respected coach, that doesn't prepare you for making the difficult selection decisions, buying and selling players or dealing with the media.That being the case, it would seem a better idea to leave him as coach, because that's what he is proven to be very good at, and just appoint a manager as normal.
If the decision is to go with Kevin then I think, as has been touched on before, he's going to need a bit of help. It's all very well having the player here like him and being a respected coach, that doesn't prepare you for making the difficult selection decisions, buying and selling players or dealing with the media.
Quote from: west sussex villan on September 01, 2010, 10:57:03 AMKevin Mac hasn't been appointed yet I know, but if he were to be. There is absolutely no way to justify a reason for employing him over the other managers who would have applied. Just playing Devil's Advocate, but how can we say that when we don't know who's applied?And my other beef is this whole application/interview process. Should we not be deciding who WE want and then going and getting him?
Kevin Mac hasn't been appointed yet I know, but if he were to be. There is absolutely no way to justify a reason for employing him over the other managers who would have applied.
I remember George Graham commenting about a certain job only a few seasons back
Quote from: hilts_coolerking on September 01, 2010, 11:40:50 AMQuote from: DB on September 01, 2010, 11:38:02 AMQuote from: Mazrim on September 01, 2010, 11:35:57 AMQuote from: damon green on September 01, 2010, 11:26:12 AMJesus H ChristBy appointing him Randy would just show we are depending on miracles and as he is supposedly omnipresent, why didnt we appoint him years ago? I would ask "where has the money gone" and "Why have we got the only Billionaire who doesn't have any money" and I'd also be a spoilt brat.At least he's sort the crosses out.Now I think about it, he's nailed on.I can just see what wouldhat happen if we appointed him, loads of trouble a slow, steady slump, but then a massive turn around come Easter.
Quote from: DB on September 01, 2010, 11:38:02 AMQuote from: Mazrim on September 01, 2010, 11:35:57 AMQuote from: damon green on September 01, 2010, 11:26:12 AMJesus H ChristBy appointing him Randy would just show we are depending on miracles and as he is supposedly omnipresent, why didnt we appoint him years ago? I would ask "where has the money gone" and "Why have we got the only Billionaire who doesn't have any money" and I'd also be a spoilt brat.At least he's sort the crosses out.Now I think about it, he's nailed on.
Quote from: Mazrim on September 01, 2010, 11:35:57 AMQuote from: damon green on September 01, 2010, 11:26:12 AMJesus H ChristBy appointing him Randy would just show we are depending on miracles and as he is supposedly omnipresent, why didnt we appoint him years ago? I would ask "where has the money gone" and "Why have we got the only Billionaire who doesn't have any money" and I'd also be a spoilt brat.At least he's sort the crosses out.
Quote from: damon green on September 01, 2010, 11:26:12 AMJesus H ChristBy appointing him Randy would just show we are depending on miracles and as he is supposedly omnipresent, why didnt we appoint him years ago? I would ask "where has the money gone" and "Why have we got the only Billionaire who doesn't have any money" and I'd also be a spoilt brat.
Jesus H Christ
and in work managers have to be applied for.
Quote from: TimTheVillain on September 01, 2010, 11:56:09 AMI think the majority of Villa fans think the same way, they have a lot of respect for KMac and want him at the club, but not as Manager.If Randy & Co. appoint him, I think it will be a decision based on lack of alternatives who are in budget and available.'In budget' is not just his salary package, it also includes the ( I would guess, verbally demonstrable) abililty to manage on a shoestring.And why would the new manager be managing on a shoestring?
Quote from: Mark Fletcher on September 01, 2010, 11:45:54 AMQuote from: hilts_coolerking on September 01, 2010, 11:40:50 AMQuote from: DB on September 01, 2010, 11:38:02 AMQuote from: Mazrim on September 01, 2010, 11:35:57 AMQuote from: damon green on September 01, 2010, 11:26:12 AMJesus H ChristBy appointing him Randy would just show we are depending on miracles and as he is supposedly omnipresent, why didnt we appoint him years ago? I would ask "where has the money gone" and "Why have we got the only Billionaire who doesn't have any money" and I'd also be a spoilt brat.At least he's sort the crosses out.Now I think about it, he's nailed on.I can just see what wouldhat happen if we appointed him, loads of trouble a slow, steady slump, but then a massive turn around come Easter.Even when he's gone his followers will worship him for ever. Oops, no that's Martin ONeill!
That would unemployed George Graham?Sure managers apply for Jobs. Even some of the best ones.Out of work managers apply for jobs and in work managers have to be applied for.
Quote from: Mazrim on September 01, 2010, 12:17:43 PMThat would unemployed George Graham?Sure managers apply for Jobs. Even some of the best ones.Out of work managers apply for jobs and in work managers have to be applied for.You think Mourinho applies for jobs? Not at all.