General, not impressed. I see no reason to pussy foot around because some reserve team coach played a load of untried kids and got away with a draw against a poor side. Has it always been club policy, even in Mons days to try and throw European matches ?Very laudable result considering but that's not Aston Villa with ambitions of success, just as depending on the youth like those on show isn't.I've always been 100% behind RL's decisions and policies, but I'm beginning to have doubts. Small ones true, but doubts never the less.
Quote from: sfx412 on August 19, 2010, 11:11:52 PMGeneral, not impressed. I see no reason to pussy foot around because some reserve team coach played a load of untried kids and got away with a draw against a poor side. Has it always been club policy, even in Mons days to try and throw European matches ?Very laudable result considering but that's not Aston Villa with ambitions of success, just as depending on the youth like those on show isn't.I've always been 100% behind RL's decisions and policies, but I'm beginning to have doubts. Small ones true, but doubts never the less.Blimey..........do you live on your own ?
Look at me, look at me!
Quote from: sfx412 on August 19, 2010, 11:11:52 PMLook at me, look at me!
General, when was the last time that we put out a full strength team in a European tie?
General,This is a question I posted not long after Martin left, which probably got swallowed up with all the others that you answered as a whole in that hectic time. Now that things have calmed down a bit, I wondered if we could re-visit it?Basically, we all understand and accept the issue of wages, their ratio to turnover and the need to manage this. But although that's one argument, the other is that what we were spending was not being fully utilised due to some high wage earners rarely featuring for the first team. So, what was/is the greater issue - total wages or the use of those wages?The reason for my question is that I feel in order to be sucessful we do need a reasonably sized squad, in which some players will feature more than others. While I accept we did not have this balance right under the last manager, this would mean that, for example, a squad of 16 or 17 senior professionals on high wages, further supplimented by our emerging youth players, is necessary to achieve our goals. So, would this be acceptable to the board, if more rotation was used, or would the wages/turnover ratio take precedence?