collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by Richard E
[Today at 08:28:33 AM]


Re: Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by PeterWithe
[Today at 08:28:09 AM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by Richard
[Today at 08:26:22 AM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 08:24:27 AM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by andyh
[Today at 08:19:53 AM]


Re: Robin Olsen by Ian.
[Today at 08:10:49 AM]


Re: Champions League Contention by Ian.
[Today at 08:09:48 AM]


Re: Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by ez
[Today at 07:57:07 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Milner Novela... Final episode page 296  (Read 646455 times)

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 71369
  • GM : 26.08.2024
The Milner Novela
« Reply #60 on: May 17, 2010, 10:07:36 PM »
Quote from: "LeeB"
Quote from: "pauliewalnuts"
Quote from: "LeeB"
Quote from: "boboonthecorner"
Quote from: "John M"
Quote from: "Mark Fletcher"
I honestly wouldn't trust MON to spend the proceeds wisely.


Yes, it's not like he could find a young player at a struggling club and within two years change his position, get him to be a certainty for the World Cup and at least double his transfer value.


For every Milner theres two or three duffers though, I agree with you Mark.


2 or 3? For example?


By the manager's admission (today) you could list Luke Young, Sidwell, NRC, Davies, Shorey, and Beye.


You could say that.

You could also say that Reo-Coker and Davies are victims of the side improving around them, and have become surplus as a result.

And then you would also have to count the 'non-duds', namely Friedel, Cuellar, Collins, Dunne, Warnock, Young, Delph (given time) and the boy Milner himself.

And then you would have to say that 2-3 duds for every one good 'un was a load of cock.


That's all well and good, but you asked for an example of duffers, so I gave you a few.

According to the press, those are the players the manager himself has referred to today as having not been up to it. He certainly didn't make it sound like the side improving around them being the reason they were on the way out.

Offline boboonthecorner

  • Member
  • Posts: 4552
The Milner Novela
« Reply #61 on: May 17, 2010, 11:28:57 PM »
Talking shite am I? We've just reeled off 14 players he's signed and has either got rid of or rumoured to be getting rid of.

Sky reporting a bid for Milner has been lodged...

Online PhilGibson

  • Member
  • Posts: 582
The Milner Novela
« Reply #62 on: May 18, 2010, 08:39:26 AM »
After what Lerner said about not selling Jimmy, he would have a lot of egg on his face, if we did sell him and it was for a fee which is less than £30 million+

I just cannot see us considering selling him before the world cup, it would make no business sense.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
The Milner Novela
« Reply #63 on: May 18, 2010, 09:25:46 AM »
Quote from: "gregnash"
then you'd have to  add salifou, knight, Heskey,  Downing, Maloney, Routledge, Carson, Harewood to the above and you think no maybe its not..


The original discussion started around whether or not we should trust Martin to spend any fee we (hopefully do not!) get for Milner.  We made money on Knight and Maloney, Routledge and Salifou were only nominal fees and Carson was a loan signing.  We can argue about Downing all day, but the only definite 'waste' was Harewood.

Offline Woofles The Wonder Dog

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11959
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2025
The Milner Novela
« Reply #64 on: May 18, 2010, 09:40:50 AM »
I find the very thought of selling Milner, for whatever amount of money, unutterably depressing.

Whatever doubts some of O'Neill's transfers might engender I think this is one of his triumphs. Milner will only get better as he is surrounded by better players. I want that to be with us.

Online Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21407
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 20.03.2025
The Milner Novela
« Reply #65 on: May 18, 2010, 10:09:40 AM »
We haven't got to sell anybody so Milner is going nowhere for now, that is, of course until should someone come in with a bid that we absolutely couldn't refuse.  Every player has a price, every player has a higher price that could take him to another club.  I can't see Man City or Chelsea offering the sort of money that would tempt us to sell....we're talking £30 million +, it isn't going to happen.

Offline Woofles The Wonder Dog

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11959
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2025
The Milner Novela
« Reply #66 on: May 18, 2010, 10:28:53 AM »
I'm sorry but that's incredibly naive - Everton didn't want to sell Lescott until it became apparent that Lescott wanted out. Yes the money was tempting, and yes they needed it more than us but in the end it was the player who wanted to go and at that point you're on the losing end of the battle.

All depends on Milner really. Don't forget that he handed in a transfer request at Newcastle when they didn't want to sell to us.

Offline KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 13488
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
The Milner Novela
« Reply #67 on: May 18, 2010, 10:42:51 AM »
I just find it very hard to get worked up about player departures any more.

For us, the game is a passion. For the players, its a career.

Jimmy does seem more grounded than some of the simpletons and bling merchants in the game, but if he has a chance to progress his career he's got to take it.

For that to happen though, we have to get maximum value. I can understand those who would be pissed off at any bid being accepted, but until we actually crack the CL ourselves it's the danger we'll always face. Don't want to go the route of harping back to the past too much, but this link and GB's eventual departure last year does illustrate the folly of not pushing on from a position of strength in Jan 09. A better forward than Ivanhoe at that point and who knows where we would be now. But that's a different argument for a different day.

At least we're in a position where our better players are assets again. It might take us longer to get back in contention when just 18 months ago it looked well within our grasp, but the hope would be that any money generated would go straight back on the side. As with the Tottenham example given earlier, it doesn't have to signal the end of our CL ambitions.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
The Milner Novela
« Reply #68 on: May 18, 2010, 10:46:27 AM »
Quote from: "Nick Lees"
I'm sorry but that's incredibly naive - Everton didn't want to sell Lescott until it became apparent that Lescott wanted out. Yes the money was tempting, and yes they needed it more than us but in the end it was the player who wanted to go and at that point you're on the losing end of the battle.

All depends on Milner really. Don't forget that he handed in a transfer request at Newcastle when they didn't want to sell to us.


I think there's a difference between Milner and Lescott.  The Klingon wanted to go and was playing his face to try and engineer a move.  Jimmy also wanted to go, as he had had enough of the Geordie circus, but did it in the right and professional way by handing in a request.

You're right that it's up to him really, but I just don't see a Lescott/Barry situation developing - he has more integrity than that!

Online Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21407
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 20.03.2025
The Milner Novela
« Reply #69 on: May 18, 2010, 10:47:59 AM »
He did Nick but Newcastle did muck him about somewhat. Milner has only been with us a short while and I don't think he's the kind of person to use us as a stepping stone at this stage of his career.  Even if Milner did want to go he goes on our terms as he's contracted to us, just like Barry went on our terms as he was contracted to us that's why we should not entertain anything less than £30 million.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 31443
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
The Milner Novela
« Reply #70 on: May 18, 2010, 11:01:19 AM »
Quote from: "pauliewalnuts"
Quote from: "LeeB"
Quote from: "pauliewalnuts"
Quote from: "LeeB"
Quote from: "boboonthecorner"
Quote from: "John M"
Quote from: "Mark Fletcher"
I honestly wouldn't trust MON to spend the proceeds wisely.


Yes, it's not like he could find a young player at a struggling club and within two years change his position, get him to be a certainty for the World Cup and at least double his transfer value.


For every Milner theres two or three duffers though, I agree with you Mark.


2 or 3? For example?


By the manager's admission (today) you could list Luke Young, Sidwell, NRC, Davies, Shorey, and Beye.


You could say that.

You could also say that Reo-Coker and Davies are victims of the side improving around them, and have become surplus as a result.

And then you would also have to count the 'non-duds', namely Friedel, Cuellar, Collins, Dunne, Warnock, Young, Delph (given time) and the boy Milner himself.

And then you would have to say that 2-3 duds for every one good 'un was a load of cock.


That's all well and good, but you asked for an example of duffers, so I gave you a few.

According to the press, those are the players the manager himself has referred to today as having not been up to it. He certainly didn't make it sound like the side improving around them being the reason they were on the way out.


Well, if you look again paulie, I was actually suggesting bob's ratio was a load of cock, not the fact that the manager signed some players who weren't good enough.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 31443
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
The Milner Novela
« Reply #71 on: May 18, 2010, 11:04:00 AM »
Quote from: "John M"
Quote from: "gregnash"
then you'd have to  add salifou, knight, Heskey,  Downing, Maloney, Routledge, Carson, Harewood to the above and you think no maybe its not..


The original discussion started around whether or not we should trust Martin to spend any fee we (hopefully do not!) get for Milner.  We made money on Knight and Maloney, Routledge and Salifou were only nominal fees and Carson was a loan signing.  We can argue about Downing all day, but the only definite 'waste' was Harewood.


Thanks John, for saving me the bother of typing that. It's a royal pain with IE8 scrollbar problem.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 31443
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
The Milner Novela
« Reply #72 on: May 18, 2010, 11:08:54 AM »
Quote from: "boboonthecorner"
Talking shite am I? We've just reeled off 14 players he's signed and has either got rid of or rumoured to be getting rid of.

Sky reporting a bid for Milner has been lodged...


And since he's arrived we've gone up 10 places in the league. Some of those players have helped us get there but are no longer up to it.

It wouldn't have been a problem if we'd have stayed shit. It's all O'Neill's fault.

Offline Woofles The Wonder Dog

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11959
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2025
The Milner Novela
« Reply #73 on: May 18, 2010, 11:10:13 AM »
Quote from: "John M"
he has more integrity than that!


Quote from: "Bren_d"
I don't think he's the kind of person


I think so too and I fervently hope so. You never can tell though. Sigh.

Offline Shrek

  • Member
  • Posts: 3980
  • Location: Holte Upper K4
  • It goes Football, Formula 1, Cricket in that order
  • GM : 04.06.2015
The Milner Novela
« Reply #74 on: May 18, 2010, 11:27:07 AM »
Discussing on talksport now.

Andy townsend really wants milner too stay at Villa!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal