Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine
Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: MplsVilla on January 19, 2023, 12:48:22 PM
-
Surprised we are behind Leeds and Everton, but heading in the right direction. Would expect us to crack the Top 20 for the 2022/23 season. The gap between the top and the lower levels is scary.
https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/sports-business-group/articles/deloitte-football-money-league.html
The story is also on the BBC website
-
We'd be top 20 if we could sort out the half time refreshments.
-
We'd be top 20 if we could sort out the half time refreshments.
Top 15
-
Everton i can understand, but Leeds?
-
Everton i can understand, but Leeds?
Away ticket sales.
-
It's odd... We have been in the PL longer than them, have higher attendances, higher transfer revenue... weird.
-
Everton i can understand, but Leeds?
Is it to do with the 49ers link? (Just a thought).
-
It's odd... We have been in the PL longer than them, have higher attendances, higher transfer revenue... weird.
Possibly bigger debts, and much higher wage liabilities?
Even the Deloittes (i think) spokesman on Radio 5 this morning suggested that valuing football clubs was very much an art, and very subjective.
-
It's odd... We have been in the PL longer than them, have higher attendances, higher transfer revenue... weird.
Possibly bigger debts, and much higher wage liabilities?
Even the Deloittes (i think) spokesman on Radio 5 this morning suggested that valuing football clubs was very much an art, and very subjective.
We don't have any debts. And no interest payments. We have £500m in the club accounts. There is no way we are worth less that Leeds Utd... They are simply wrong...
-
I thought it was based on income, not including transfers. So basically TV money, match day income, commercial income.
-
I only read the report briefly, but it looks like it's based on revenue, so debts, interest payments, cash, etc. have no impact on where a club is ranked.
-
It's odd... We have been in the PL longer than them, have higher attendances, higher transfer revenue... weird.
Empty seats at home to Wolves, innit?
-
I don’t need a Deloitte report to tell me our owners are minted and they have supported our club from the moment they arrived. That’s all that matters.
-
It's odd... We have been in the PL longer than them, have higher attendances, higher transfer revenue... weird.
Empty seats at home to Wolves, innit?
Flinstone was right after all
-
The report indicates we were only £1.4m behind 20th-placed Newcastle. Given they have a 50k-seater stadium I hope we do a better job of generating income from the extra seats when we expand VP.
-
Everton i can understand, but Leeds?
It's based on revenue, so I'm guessing it includes them getting over £100m for Philips and Raphinha in the last year?
-
Everton i can understand, but Leeds?
It's based on revenue, so I'm guessing it includes them getting over £100m for Philips and Raphinha in the last year?
It doesn't include transfers
-
Everton i can understand, but Leeds?
It's based on revenue, so I'm guessing it includes them getting over £100m for Philips and Raphinha in the last year?
It doesn't include transfers
Blimey, then how the hell are we only £12m ahead of BRIGHTON??
-
It does seem a bit odd - but my best guess is that €212m figure is actually for the 2020/21 season - as the club hasn't actually published its 2021/22 accounts yet. Revenue for 2020/21 was around £184m, which is (roughly) €212m.
Point being, it's probably not a fair comparison & we'll more than likely be in the top 20 next time.