collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Recent Posts

Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Dogtanian
[Today at 05:51:10 PM]


Re: Aston Villa Kit 26/27 by The Man With A Stick
[Today at 05:29:20 PM]


Re: Summer 26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by jwarry
[Today at 05:25:04 PM]


Re: FFP by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 05:24:30 PM]


Re: FFP by Rory
[Today at 05:22:45 PM]


Re: Aston Villa Kit 26/27 by Drummond
[Today at 05:15:18 PM]


Re: FFP by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 05:15:07 PM]


Re: FFP by Rory
[Today at 05:08:40 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: England national team  (Read 27555 times)

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 84448
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: England national team
« Reply #330 on: Today at 02:58:24 PM »
Not the best advert for a qtr final is it?

What quarter final?

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43599
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2027
Re: England national team
« Reply #331 on: Today at 03:11:39 PM »
According to Sky, Mexico have only ever lost twice at the Azteca stadium. It’s going to be a massive ask for England to progress given they will not have been able to acclimatise to the higher altitude.


The altitude is the combined height of Ben Nevis and Snowdon eeeek !!
Which begs the question why the fuck do FIFA keep giving them Wotld cups? - this is their third.

They gave them their second because Colombia withdrew at the last second (if only Donald Trump's dad... etc). They gave them their third because it was North America's turn to host (no continent other than Oceania has waited longer) and the US realised that a mainly-US bid with a few games in Canada and Mexico would be more popular than a standalone bid.

If this makes you angry, well, it will almost certainly be back in North America (probably including Mexico) in 2038 as, again, Oceania is the only other continent that is eligible to host and it isn't really feasible for New Zealand to host a 48-team World Cup, even if they rope in powerhouses like Nauru and Palau to assist.

There should just be two entities in the rotation, Europe and Rest of the World.

Rest of the World's turn should be a 50/50 spit between South America and the Rest of the Rest of the World.

ie World Cups should be 50% in Europe, 25% in South America and 25% in the Rest of the World.

Never happen of course, due to FIFA's money-grabbing thinly disguised as spreading the word of football around the globe.

Surpised China didn't get one during that period they were chucking money at football.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 80242
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: England national team
« Reply #332 on: Today at 03:19:55 PM »
The idea that World Cups should be held in Europe 50% of the time is pretty mad. 25% in South America even madder. That would leave nearly 90% of the world's population chasing a World Cup between them once every sixteen years. The current rotation policy isn't too bad but merge The Americas.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:22:35 PM by cdbearsfan »

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46585
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 13.12.2026
Re: England national team
« Reply #333 on: Today at 04:13:41 PM »
According to Sky, Mexico have only ever lost twice at the Azteca stadium. It’s going to be a massive ask for England to progress given they will not have been able to acclimatise to the higher altitude.
This ever lost twice is a bit of a false mountain. You need to look at who they have played there and its mostly the giants of CONCACAF. They did however beat Belgium twice and Brazil once. (friendlies I assume?)

Belgium was in the '86 World Cup. Brazil was 4-3 in the final of the '99 Confederations Cup.

The beat Scotland 1-0 there in one of McGinn's early international games. If Scotland were able to escape a thrashing in the clouds (as have nearly every other semi-competent team to play there), I'm sure England don't need to stress too much about it.
Yes. I think it's an issue of attitude rather than altitude.

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46585
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 13.12.2026
Re: England national team
« Reply #334 on: Today at 04:16:53 PM »
If you are 1-0 down in a knockout game with less than 15 minutes to go to win it is a rescue act.

My definition of a rescue act is if we had called on Watkins who then scored them both. Kane was simply doing the job he failed to do for 75 mins, but is expected to do which is score the goals. In fact Gordon is the one who did the rescuing as he set them both up when the other wingers couldn't.
As far as the individual you mentioned I agree. The  assertion that "when his country needed him" is overplayed.

Online Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24495
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: England national team
« Reply #335 on: Today at 04:48:26 PM »
What Roy Keane probably said. Kane is a special player mind.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal