Objectively, Palace. The draw had opened up for us and the Cup is something that still means a lot to those of us of a certain age. However, the outcome is tempered by the fact that perhaps Palace's name was indeed on the trophy and I don't begrudge a so-called lesser club's fans having a once-in-a-lifetime experience. Yesterday will take a lot of getting over. Other results aligned and the implications of not making the Champions League may well see us dropping down the pecking order next season and beyond. Our record against Manchester Utd has been done to death, but let's imagine a roll reversal. Last game of the season, we've had an appalling nine months, we've just lost the one game that would give the shit-show some lustre and the team we're facing at Villa Park needs a needs to win to be in contention of finishing top five. You just know that we'd be a goal or three down at half-time and end up doing an embarrassing lap of appreciation to an empty ground having been well-and-truly mullered. That's really how poor yesterday was.
Wolves away, a first half so bad we made 4 subs at HT. The 2nd half wasn't much better.
The FA Cup semi was an utterly bizarre performance in the most winnable cup for years.Losing at Newton Heath is bog standard Villa
Quote from: ChicagoLion on May 26, 2025, 09:35:32 AMQuote from: brontebilly on May 26, 2025, 09:30:01 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on May 26, 2025, 09:28:07 AMThe most is not important, it’s the frequency and a lot of it being down to selection and tactics/ strategy.Then an unwillingness to change it when it is not working.It's just hard to believe he didn't make at least two subs at half time. Our season was on the lineYes, Maatsen was all over the place which meant SJM was charging around trying to cover, Rogers was leaving Cash exposed on the other wing.I didn't think Maatsen was noticeably bad in the first half, just poor. As you say Rogers was delinquent really in not helping Cash out, Mount was causing problems in a constant 2 on 1 on that side. At least McGinn was covering Maatsen, too much probably. Surprised with Rogers as he worked hard in a similar role v Bournemouth but he didn't try a leg for some reason in that first half, spooked maybe. Emery had options, swap McGinn and Rogers was obvious after about 15 mins. As utterly awful as we were in the first half and despite the red card, we were somehow still in the game at half time. I said it on match thread that I thought Mings and Tielemans had to come in for Torres and Onana. They were no brainer subs. Maatsen had the nightmare of all nightmares in that second half. Emery should have recognised that very early on. Aside from the spectacular mistakes, he had at least one if not two of those gutless headers in our box just back out to the D for Fernandes or one of them to have a crack at. His head was gone. Digne brought calm when he came on at Arsenal in a similar situation. Mings and Tielemans, we just needed calmness then. The situation was salvable. Three very experienced players on our bench and yet he goes back out with same 10!Maatsen yesterday eclipsed Konsa at Ipswich as the worst individual performance of the season for me. His form had been improving lately and I was all for showing faith in him. But that was badly misplaced.
Quote from: brontebilly on May 26, 2025, 09:30:01 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on May 26, 2025, 09:28:07 AMThe most is not important, it’s the frequency and a lot of it being down to selection and tactics/ strategy.Then an unwillingness to change it when it is not working.It's just hard to believe he didn't make at least two subs at half time. Our season was on the lineYes, Maatsen was all over the place which meant SJM was charging around trying to cover, Rogers was leaving Cash exposed on the other wing.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on May 26, 2025, 09:28:07 AMThe most is not important, it’s the frequency and a lot of it being down to selection and tactics/ strategy.Then an unwillingness to change it when it is not working.It's just hard to believe he didn't make at least two subs at half time. Our season was on the line
The most is not important, it’s the frequency and a lot of it being down to selection and tactics/ strategy.Then an unwillingness to change it when it is not working.
I'm going to go with yesterday, they say with the cold light of morning you take a more balanced view, its worse to day than yesterday, I just don't get it, I don't get the the players the team the tactics I don't even get the manager in the approach to the game, nothing makes sense.
While Palace can be compared as equally as bad the difference is that they’re a very good side. ManU were there for the taking because they’ve not been this poor for 20 odd years and they’d lost a final earlier in the week. But we still managed to make them look decent.