'They're saying he touched the ball but not enough?!?!?' - this has been the rule since forever, just touching the ball doesn't necessarily mean it's not a foul. Cash got a toe on it but they clearly thought Soucek would've had it under control were he not clattered...
In fairness to West Ham, they did try to play out from the back a bit more yesterday but got caught a few times like we did when we first started the new wayThat’s one thing we did yesterday we played out from the back beautifully, we are learning and not giving us fans heart failure anywhere near as much
Quote from: john e on August 18, 2024, 11:49:52 AMIn fairness to West Ham, they did try to play out from the back a bit more yesterday but got caught a few times like we did when we first started the new wayThat’s one thing we did yesterday we played out from the back beautifully, we are learning and not giving us fans heart failure anywhere near as muchI read a few reports about other team's pre seasons and I think West Ham and Chelsea were two mentioned as trying to play the way we do, but they were struggling to adapt.
We seemed to adapt very quickly to Emery's style when he came in, but it may have been a case of him recognising what the players he had were capable of, and only asking them to adapt so much at first. As he's started adding his own players we've got better and better at it. If he'd just come in and expected us to play like we are now straight away, it wouldn't have worked.
I watched Bailey’s ‘Miss’ where he hit the post. I’m convinced it glanced off the defender who threw himself in front of Bailey’s shot which would otherwise have gone in.
You're correct that just winning the ball doesn't mean that a foul isn't then committed, but in this case, Cash does win the ball, then Soucek puts his leg between Cash's legs, and they both fall over.