Morgan Rogers

[Monty]

Bellingham's not a midfielder, but nor is he a 10. He is apparently a terrible player with no discipline who does nothing except, well, everything.

...Said nobody ever

Is there anything you don't express in extremes?

You have over reacted, chill out.

Howling with laughter, thank you for this.

[Hookeysmith]

So who is buying him today then?

Amazed Spurzzzzzzzzzzz have not been linked as they try to get back to the top of the relevance league

[eamonn]

Still Arsenal, I think.

[Drummond]

It's Millhouses Juniors FC AGM tonight. I'll let you know if a warchest has been identified.

[Tuscans]

 NEW: Morgan Rogers is valued at a British record £130m by Aston Villa — they do not want to sell him & believe he is worth more than Elliot Anderson (£116m).
@TeleFootball

[Stu]

NEW: Morgan Rogers is valued at a British record £130m by Aston Villa — they do not want to sell him & believe he is worth more than Elliot Anderson (£116m).
@TeleFootball

Well he is. He’s been producing top performances a lot longer than Anderson for a start.

[Crown Hill]

Hope the report that we have seemingly named a price doesn’t mean a slippery slope to a lower agreed fee!

I’d rather keep him!

[Chris Harte]

Me as well.

[Brazilian Villain]

Hope the report that we have seemingly named a price doesn’t mean a slippery slope to a lower agreed fee!

I’d rather keep him!

Yeah, I'm not a fan of setting a price when you really want to keep a player.

[Clive W]

Matt Law in the DT saying that the club values him at £130m

[kippaxvilla2]

£130m from £15m would be a remarkable profit!

[Rigadon]

This is how it goes isn’t it. He’ll go for c£120m ish I reckon.  Arsenal will pay it like they did for Rice.  Shame he’ll end up there, but no club can turn >100m for any player who wants to leave.

[Clive W]

This is from the Matt Law DT article:-

“ Villa do not want to sell Rogers and believe he is worth more than his England team-mate Elliot Anderson, who agreed a move from Nottingham Forest to Manchester City for £116m.

It is understood that Villa believe Rogers is worth £130m, which is £5m more than the British record £125m Liverpool paid Newcastle United for Alexander Isak last summer.

Villa’s valuation also factors in the fact that Middlesbrough hold a 20 per cent sell-on clause on Rogers, who they sold in a deal worth £15m in the 2024 winter transfer window.

It remains to be seen whether Arsenal or Chelsea would be prepared meet the £130m valuation, or whether Villa could be negotiated down.”

[Steve67]

You don’t name a price unless he’s for sale. Time to shit or get off the pot Chelsea or Arsenal.

[PeterWithesShin]

Every player on the planet is for sale at the right price. By saying 130m minimum we've hopefully put off anyone wasting our time with low ball offers. And at least it indicates there's no buyout clause at a lower price.