collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by FatSam
[Today at 08:53:33 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 08:53:27 PM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by Demitri_C
[Today at 08:51:50 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 08:49:07 PM]


Jacob Ramsey by PaulWinch again
[Today at 08:48:23 PM]


Leon Bailey by SaddVillan
[Today at 08:47:51 PM]


The Barton's Arms by cdbearsfan
[Today at 08:28:46 PM]


Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by PaulWinch again
[Today at 08:25:55 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread  (Read 31887 times)

Offline The Edge

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7462
  • Location: I can see villa park from my bedroom window
  • GM : PCM
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #270 on: February 21, 2022, 01:00:55 PM »
You mean others think Queen are meh too?

They are far, far worse than 'meh'. They are an abomination. An absolute embarrassment to our species.

I agree with SE.

Same. They belong at Butlins. Cabaret shite.

Butlins is like a holiday camp compared to where they deserve to be.
Fkin hate Queen.

Fkin love Queen
Fight! Fight! Fight! Fight!

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47672
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #271 on: February 21, 2022, 01:04:09 PM »
You mean others think Queen are meh too?

They are far, far worse than 'meh'. They are an abomination. An absolute embarrassment to our species.

I agree with SE.

Same. They belong at Butlins. Cabaret shite.

Butlins is like a holiday camp compared to where they deserve to be.

Fkin hate Queen.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #272 on: February 21, 2022, 01:08:01 PM »
I think all that Heavy Metal has sent you a bit mutton, BV! ;)

Offline Villa Lew

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9076
  • Age: 75
  • GM : 16.08.2026
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #273 on: February 21, 2022, 01:10:33 PM »
Just saw the Ings pen decision on SSN. Fucking hell.

The panel saying VAR wouldnt get involved because it wasnt clear and obvious. I will remember that next time we're having a 5 minute check at Old Trafford.

They didn't show it on the highlights but they've got it here on Watford's website:

https://www.watfordfc.com/video/match-highlights/highlights-aston-villa-0-1-watford-premier-league-202122#play

How the fuck is that not a penalty, absolutely nailed on, all day long.

We didn't play well, but score that after two minutes and their game plan of 11 men behind the ball and breaking on the counter plus time wasting at every opportunity goes out of the window, and we'd probably end up 3-0 winners.

Yeah as clear and obvious as you could get, penalty all day long.

Offline cdward

  • Member
  • Posts: 2258
  • Location: Maynooth via Six Ways Erdington
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #274 on: February 21, 2022, 01:15:06 PM »
From the first 2 minutes of the game where we passed it around the back and kept possession in our own half and not one Watford player even attempted to make a challenge, it was obvious they were happy to just not concede, and would have taken the nil-nil then.
Too many times they pulled 10 men behind the ball and we were left wondering how to break it down.
A couple of key moments, the penalty that wasn't, the Digne free kick (that didn't have a lucky Trippier deflection), and the Ings chance that hit the post, all could have been in our favour but weren't.

I struggle to see where our next win will come from, but it won't be against the bottom teams, unless we change the way we play.

Offline PaulTheVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 23880
  • GM : 16.08.2022
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #275 on: February 21, 2022, 02:20:19 PM »
I think all that Heavy Metal has sent you a bit mutton, BV! ;)
Queen are pop, not metal :D

Offline CT Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2495
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #276 on: February 21, 2022, 02:52:26 PM »
Queen were excellent in their day and highly innovative, but times have changed.

I would think "Let Us Burn" by Within Temptation would be more appropriate as the players come out these days.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35532
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #277 on: February 21, 2022, 02:59:53 PM »
Queen were excellent in their day and highly innovative, but times have changed.

I would think "Let Us Burn" by Within Temptation would be more appropriate as the players come out these days.

"I Can't Even Be Bothered" by the Charlatans would be more appropriate.

Offline Hookeysmith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13320
  • Age: 61
  • Location: One hand on the handle of the mad / sane door
  • GM : 06.02.2026
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #278 on: February 21, 2022, 03:41:12 PM »
The more you see the penalty the more it looks like a penalty

Could you imaging any of the scum 6 not getting that?????

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63328
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #279 on: February 21, 2022, 04:02:36 PM »
From the first 2 minutes of the game where we passed it around the back and kept possession in our own half and not one Watford player even attempted to make a challenge, it was obvious they were happy to just not concede, and would have taken the nil-nil then.
Too many times they pulled 10 men behind the ball and we were left wondering how to break it down.
A couple of key moments, the penalty that wasn't, the Digne free kick (that didn't have a lucky Trippier deflection), and the Ings chance that hit the post, all could have been in our favour but weren't.

I struggle to see where our next win will come from, but it won't be against the bottom teams, unless we change the way we play.

Right up until they scored they were aiming for the point. Their defending was last-ditch with an hour left. 

Offline caster troy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1514
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #280 on: February 21, 2022, 05:37:57 PM »
Our xG was 1.25 to their 1.75. But I think that flatters us because I'm sure Ings was offside for his shot that hit the post, so that takes us down 0.44.

Our xGOT (expected goals on target) was 0.08. That is horrific. Our only shot on target was Buendia's weak left foot curler after 60 minutes. Watfords xGOT was 1.94. So Martinez did well, on the flipside they could probably have had Hodgson himself in goal and not conceded.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63328
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #281 on: February 21, 2022, 05:40:58 PM »
Our xG was 1.25 to their 1.75. But I think that flatters us because I'm sure Ings was offside for his shot that hit the post, so that takes us down 0.44.

Our xGOT (expected goals on target) was 0.08. That is horrific. Our only shot on target was Buendia's weak left foot curler after 60 minutes. Watfords xGOT was 1.94. So Martinez did well, on the flipside they could probably have had Hodgson himself in goal and not conceded.

I understood the last sentence but what language was the rest?

Offline Pat McMahon

  • Member
  • Posts: 7236
  • Location: Shanghai - Blarney Stone for Villa games
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #282 on: February 21, 2022, 06:02:21 PM »
If it wasn't a penalty then why was it a corner seeing as their guy didn't touch the ball?

I think the claim was that their bloke played the ball first before fouling Ings. Which still makes it a penalty.

Offline caster troy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1514
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #283 on: February 21, 2022, 06:03:51 PM »
Our xG was 1.25 to their 1.75. But I think that flatters us because I'm sure Ings was offside for his shot that hit the post, so that takes us down 0.44.

Our xGOT (expected goals on target) was 0.08. That is horrific. Our only shot on target was Buendia's weak left foot curler after 60 minutes. Watfords xGOT was 1.94. So Martinez did well, on the flipside they could probably have had Hodgson himself in goal and not conceded.

I understood the last sentence but what language was the rest?

Apologies. xG (expected goals) is a measure of the quality of chances created, and xGOT (expected goals on target) factors in the quality of the finishing. So on Saturday even though we had 20 shots they were all from positions where a goal was unlikely, and the quality of the shots was very poor. Watford  created less chances but they were in much better positions and they finished better. Basically the stats back up my instinctive view that we wouldn't have scored if we'd played all night, but Watford would have kept coming up with more goals on the counter every now and then.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30235
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Aston Villa 0 Watford 1 Post Match Thread
« Reply #284 on: February 21, 2022, 06:08:00 PM »
Expected Goals is just a load of bollocks.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal