There were two versions of the plans knocking around from Lerner's days. I can only find this one at over 51k, but I'm sure the other option had a bigger corner increasing capacity a bit further.
With regard to the problems of the rail services, perhaps Wes has plans:https://www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2020/06/11/inside-a-wall-street-tycoons-plan-to-get-americans-off-the-highway---and-on-his-trains/?sh=11bf34cb7a04
I’ve been supporting Villa for over 60 years and two excerpts from Simon’s book celebrating 100 years of VP sum it up for me: -“all of us who make that regular pilgrimage to Villa Park tread not only a well worn path through the century, but also through the winding roads of our own personal histories.As we grow from childhood into adulthood…change schools and jobs…move from house to house or town to town, Villa Park remains a constant, helping to nurture our passage through life”and“Of course every football fan likes to imagine that their home ground is unique, that their club is special. And they are absolutely right to feel that way. But in truth, Villa fans are luckier than most”Stay
Copy the Holte at the Witton End as has been suggested on here a few times. You probably could get 14-15k with that design at that end.That gets you up to around 48-50k. I think that would do for the moment.
A copy of the Holte End isn't going to achieve what the club want - aside from the increase in capacity, Purslow was pretty clear that a major objective in any redevelopment is a large increase in the availability of corporate seats. To get that the design is more likely to mirror the Trinity Road stand, which then make more sense in joining the two stands in the corners.The other issue with a replica of the Holte End, I suspect, is that regulations have changed since it was built. There would need to be larger seats, more exits etc. which would reduce the capacity of the stand in comparison. I know that when Liverpool have built their new stands, for instance, they have been done as expansions of the original stands rather than complete new builds as this is a way of maintaining the capacity of the original areas which would otherwise have been reduced considerably.
Then give it a year or two and it'll be the worst thing ever again, and people will want something new (or lament what we had). 😉
I reckon a new ground would go in a similar way to Gerrard replacing Smith. Everybody would get all angsty about it to begin with, then the first time we smash Liverpool 4-0 there, they can get served with a pie at half time and be away from the ground in 20 minutes at the end, they'd then pretend that they were in favour all along.
Quote from: Drummond on January 14, 2022, 09:31:40 AMThen give it a year or two and it'll be the worst thing ever again, and people will want something new (or lament what we had). 😉 When has anybody ever lamented an ex-manager?!
I can't see much happening re transport. How much political will is there to solve something that's a bit of a pain for a relatively small amount of people on one afternoon or evening every 19 days on average?
I’ve been supporting Villa for over 60 years and two excerpts from Simon’s book celebrating 100 years of VP sum it up for me: -“all of us who make that regular pilgrimage to Villa Park tread not only a well worn path through the century, but also through the winding roads of our own personal histories.As we grow from childhood into adulthood…change schools and jobs…move from house to house or town to town, Villa Park remains a constant, helping to nurture our passage through life”