collapse collapse
Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

July 23, 2022, 07:04:34 PM by algy | Views: 80379 | Comments: 3

Notice this ... should it be t...
August 10, 2021, 03:37:52 PM by dave.woodhall | Views: 104043 | Comments: 6

It will soon be three years si...
August 09, 2021, 02:47:33 PM by dave.woodhall | Views: 104678 | Comments: 40

The Jack Grealish transfer mad...
August 08, 2021, 11:32:36 PM by dave.woodhall | Views: 99888 | Comments: 9

So he chose success after all....
August 07, 2021, 01:22:40 AM by dave.woodhall | Views: 98868 | Comments: 3

I well remember the day in Feb...

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?  (Read 32828 times)

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 3542
  • GM : 06.09.2021
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #405 on: August 28, 2022, 03:05:33 PM »
I see we started with Watkins and Ings Vs West Ham.
Any good first half ?

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56625
  • Age: 51
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #406 on: August 28, 2022, 03:06:07 PM »
No.

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 3542
  • GM : 06.09.2021
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #407 on: August 28, 2022, 03:16:18 PM »
Oh

Offline Axl Rose

  • Member
  • Posts: 9237
  • Location: Tokyo
  • GM : 02.04.2022
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #408 on: August 28, 2022, 03:19:44 PM »
Ollie if it's one up front.

If we go with two up top, Ings and Archer.

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 3542
  • GM : 06.09.2021
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #409 on: August 31, 2022, 07:04:36 PM »
Watkins has been preferred and SG seems to be saving Ings for Man City
However a positive result could see the same front 3
Gerrard plays this horses for courses but at some point archer to should be given more minutes.

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56625
  • Age: 51
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #410 on: August 31, 2022, 07:09:47 PM »
Archer is carrying a hip injury so on this occasion I hope not. Quite surprised to see him included to be honest. Watch him get 20 minutes now!

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 3542
  • GM : 06.09.2021
Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« Reply #411 on: September 01, 2022, 02:24:29 PM »
I think Archer should have been given some game time yesterday.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal