collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by eamonn
[Today at 06:35:37 PM]


Ollie Watkins by Smirker
[Today at 06:34:02 PM]


Winter 25-26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Ian.
[Today at 06:30:28 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Des Little
[Today at 06:10:44 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 04:43:29 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 04:41:18 PM]


Boxing 2025 by PaulWinch again
[Today at 04:28:07 PM]


Games Moved for TV by Lsvilla
[Today at 03:57:07 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: 2.2727 % Villa - Government plans to lift football standing ban  (Read 3111 times)

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75566
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: 2.2727 % Villa - Government plans to lift football standing ban
« Reply #15 on: August 29, 2021, 09:25:52 PM »
Yes that would make sense.

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 11817
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: 2.2727 % Villa - Government plans to lift football standing ban
« Reply #16 on: August 29, 2021, 09:40:57 PM »
I would have rounded that up to 2.3% but I know ALita is a stickler for detail.

1 divided by 44 is 2.2727 recurring. As in it is the .27 that recurs. I did make an attempt to build in the recurring sign above the 27 by copy/pasting but it wouldn't work. I did also consider saying recurring in the title but '2.27 recurring%' would cause misunderstanding being interpreted as 2.277777etc.

Offline Sdwbvf

  • Member
  • Posts: 354
Re: 2.2727 % Villa - Government plans to lift football standing ban
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2021, 10:46:50 PM »
The dots above the 2 and 7 are a bit tricky on a forum.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89951
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: 2.2727 % Villa - Government plans to lift football standing ban
« Reply #18 on: August 29, 2021, 11:18:51 PM »
2.272̇7̇

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75566
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: 2.2727 % Villa - Government plans to lift football standing ban
« Reply #19 on: August 29, 2021, 11:45:53 PM »
    . .
2.27

Offline Sdwbvf

  • Member
  • Posts: 354

Online amfy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5104
  • Location: L7
  • GM : 24.07.2026
Re: 2.2727 % Villa - Government plans to lift football standing ban
« Reply #21 on: August 31, 2021, 09:59:39 AM »
I should say that whilst safe standing can be installed in The Holte End, there cannot be an increase in capacity. It would have to remain one person to one seat space because the concourse, exits, toilets, & most importantly; the structure, are only designed for a certain number of people.

The north stand was designed for standing but with modern standards being different, I wouldn’t expect an increased standing there either.

A new rebuilt north stand has the potential to have a flexible capacity for standing or sitting and that was actually the basis of my original request years ago….i.e. Can design for the new north stand include contingency for safe standing to be introduced? My fear was that we could spend a lot of money on a new structure that did not include this flexibility/

Installing rail seating is fairly straightforward, but increasing capacity for 3 people to 2 seats when standing is not.

The key advantage of rail seating over the current situation is the prevention of toppling, which has become an increasing problem in recent years, not necessarily a capacity increase at this stage.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal