collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 12:06:50 AM]


NSWE Investment by Dogtanian
[July 08, 2026, 11:55:33 PM]


Emi Martinez by Matt C
[July 08, 2026, 11:53:59 PM]


FFP by kippaxvilla2
[July 08, 2026, 11:03:03 PM]


Summer 26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Skipper_The_Eyechild
[July 08, 2026, 10:39:40 PM]


England national team by Brend'Watkins
[July 08, 2026, 09:06:19 PM]


Celebrity Fans: What's The Point? by Tokyo Sexwhale
[July 08, 2026, 08:49:27 PM]


Champions League 2026/27-now with added Super Cup by cdbearsfan
[July 08, 2026, 08:15:52 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 12:06:50 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 12:01:59 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Dogtanian
[July 08, 2026, 11:58:21 PM]


Re: NSWE Investment by Dogtanian
[July 08, 2026, 11:55:33 PM]


Re: Emi Martinez by Matt C
[July 08, 2026, 11:53:59 PM]


Re: Emi Martinez by Crown Hill
[July 08, 2026, 11:50:59 PM]


Re: Emi Martinez by Ozzjim
[July 08, 2026, 11:47:03 PM]


Re: Emi Martinez by Tuscans
[July 08, 2026, 11:37:04 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 826718 times)

Online AV82EC

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13749
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #7230 on: July 08, 2026, 08:43:06 PM »
This gigs thing is a red herring for me, yes it helps Spurs but their real commercial and sponsorship income is where they dwarf ours, that’s the key to this not a few concerts.

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12847
Re: FFP
« Reply #7231 on: July 08, 2026, 08:50:57 PM »
The commercial income for the last available period was £83m (Villa) vs £330m (Spurs).

Between FoS, Sleeve and kit Villa earned £39m vs £100m for Spurs. Those three things surpassed our total commercial income for the year.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 38039
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #7232 on: July 08, 2026, 09:06:54 PM »
The commercial income for the last available period was £83m (Villa) vs £330m (Spurs).

Between FoS, Sleeve and kit Villa earned £39m vs £100m for Spurs. Those three things surpassed our total commercial income for the year.

This is true, but ours has almost quadrupled in four years, and doubled from 2024 to 2025. We’ve made a fortune out of the academy, and we’ve only just begun heavily investing in infrastructure. I think we can get closer to the Slimey 6 in revenue, and I also think that the 14th richest club in the world should be able to compete at sport with the 9th richest, especially when we’re all allowed the same number of players. Look at the league table.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2026, 09:10:00 PM by Percy McCarthy »

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 11684
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: FFP
« Reply #7233 on: July 08, 2026, 09:18:46 PM »
Interesting. The size of the stadium will have minimal impact on the value of sponsorship deals. Keep winning and these deals should follow.

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12847
Re: FFP
« Reply #7234 on: July 08, 2026, 09:18:53 PM »
The commercial income for the last available period was £83m (Villa) vs £330m (Spurs).

Between FoS, Sleeve and kit Villa earned £39m vs £100m for Spurs. Those three things surpassed our total commercial income for the year.

This is true, but ours has almost quadrupled in four years, and doubled from 2024 to 2025. We’ve made a fortune out of the academy, and we’ve only just begun heavily investing in infrastructure. I think we can get closer to the Slimey 6 in revenue, and I also think that the 14th richest club in the world should be able to compete at sport with the 9th richest, especially when we’re all allowed the same number of players. Look at the league table.
I can't argue with any of that.

I feel that the betting ban on FoS has come at the wrong time for Villa. I'm sure this will negatively impact on what we get for the next FoS. Even if it turns out the annual figure is more than the £20m p/s of the Betano deal, I'm sure with betting still permissible it would have been a bigger figure.


Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12847
Re: FFP
« Reply #7235 on: July 08, 2026, 09:44:08 PM »
Not sure if the following figures are relevant, but a ratio of FoS & Sleeve & Kit to Total Commercial for the most recent period.

Villa 47% (£39m/£83m).
Newcastle 52% (£72.5m/£139m).
Arsenal 43% (£135m/£314m)
Liverpool 33% (£122m/£366m)
Man City 46% (£187.5m/£408m)
Man Utd 43% (£170m/£397m)
Spurs 30% (£100m/£330m).

I suppose our ratio is similar to others, however I'm surprised Liverpool's isn't a lower figure, and ditto for Man United, given their global appeal over many decades. I also thought Newcastle would be further ahead of us.

Offline Beard82

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5891
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Suffolk
  • GM : 18.01.2027
Re: FFP
« Reply #7236 on: July 08, 2026, 10:19:53 PM »
Why would newcastle be twice ours - is that UCL!  Was our lower than the previous year?

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12847
Re: FFP
« Reply #7237 on: July 08, 2026, 10:29:33 PM »
Why would newcastle be twice ours - is that UCL!  Was our lower than the previous year?
The figues are for 2024/25, so we were in the CL and Newcastle wasn't. That said, I'm not sure the prize money for CL was in with commercial in the Deloitte figures (my source).

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 84713
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: FFP
« Reply #7238 on: July 08, 2026, 10:52:03 PM »
Quote
In addition, Tottenham's new stadium, which can now host up to 30 non-football events a year at full capacity, is proving to be very beneficial.

At their old White Hart Lane ground, annual matchday revenue was £45m and commercial income - which includes concerts and NFL games - was £73m.

At the new stadium those figures were £126m and £277m, respectively, in 2024-25. The additional money coming into the club allows it to spend more under the SCR regime.

While the club has spent a lot of money this summer to date, transfer fees are amortised over the length of the contract, but limited to five years, so a £240m spend this summer equates to a £48m amortisation fee.

Tottenham's total revenue for 2024-25 was £565m. Under SCR rules they would be able to spend up to £480m a year on their squad.

Offline kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 31709
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: FFP
« Reply #7239 on: July 08, 2026, 11:03:03 PM »
It’s okay we are getting an extra 7000 odd  seats on an infill.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal