collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 346422 times)

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 42108
  • GM : 09.03.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #3825 on: January 14, 2025, 02:28:18 PM »
"No complaint has been brought against Leicester by the Premier League for any breach of the PSRs for the period ending season 23/24."

Thoughts and prayers with Mr Poppadopolus, the Bristol City fan.

Now, now, he's hasn't mentioned our finances on OTIB in over 16 hours.

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 26442
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: FFP
« Reply #3826 on: January 14, 2025, 08:46:15 PM »
Can anyone tell me how Forest complied?  There’s something very wrong if we had to sell players on twice as much revenue.

Online LukeJames

  • Member
  • Posts: 5325
Re: FFP
« Reply #3827 on: January 14, 2025, 08:52:38 PM »
"No complaint has been brought against Leicester by the Premier League for any breach of the PSRs for the period ending season 23/24."

Thoughts and prayers with Mr Poppadopolus, the Bristol City fan.

Now, now, he's hasn't mentioned our finances on OTIB in over 16 hours.
Completely forgot about this. What a time to be alive that was.

Online ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 24862
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: FFP
« Reply #3828 on: January 14, 2025, 09:00:03 PM »
Can anyone tell me how Forest complied?  There’s something very wrong if we had to sell players on twice as much revenue.
They didn’t , they got a points deduction which didn’t matter.

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 26442
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: FFP
« Reply #3829 on: January 14, 2025, 09:01:03 PM »
I was on about this financial year but I assume the Johnson money was booked.

Online ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 24862
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: FFP
« Reply #3830 on: January 14, 2025, 09:02:05 PM »
I was on about this financial year but I assume the Johnson money was booked.
Ok.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 45757
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #3831 on: January 14, 2025, 09:03:21 PM »
I was on about this financial year but I assume the Johnson money was booked.

I'm guessing that the £12m they got from Newcastle for their third choice goalkeeper was a bit of Iroegbunam / Dobbin style jiggery-pokery.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2025, 09:14:13 PM by Dave »

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 26442
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: FFP
« Reply #3832 on: January 14, 2025, 09:05:15 PM »
That’s not on.






Unless we do it.

Offline lovejoy

  • Member
  • Posts: 9105
  • Location: Haywards Heath
Re: FFP
« Reply #3833 on: January 15, 2025, 12:00:21 AM »
We can moan about teams bending the spirit of the rules but we are just as guilty.

Offline OCD

  • Member
  • Posts: 33623
  • Location: Stuck in the middle with you
    • http://www.rightconsultant.com
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: FFP
« Reply #3834 on: January 15, 2025, 11:07:45 AM »
The rules are daft though and Premier League clubs won't vote changes through because of a perceived competitive advantage.

Offline Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 7648
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: FFP
« Reply #3835 on: January 15, 2025, 11:18:15 AM »
The rules are daft though and Premier League clubs won't vote changes through because of a perceived competitive advantage.
They all change next season.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 35892
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: FFP
« Reply #3836 on: January 15, 2025, 11:29:27 AM »
Any system that makes selling your academy products the right thing to do in almost any circumstance is crap and completely at odds with other rules that were put in place to try to encourage teams to develop their own talent.

Offline Hookeysmith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12730
  • Age: 61
  • Location: One hand on the handle of the mad / sane door
  • GM : 06.02.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #3837 on: January 15, 2025, 01:19:43 PM »
Any system that makes selling your academy products the right thing to do in almost any circumstance is crap and completely at odds with other rules that were put in place to try to encourage teams to develop their own talent.

Again it is evidence that it props up the "big" teams like Chelsea and Cite£ as they have huge academys where they just sell off players every year.

For every cock up (Like Cole Palmer) there are lots of kids that are just bargaining chips that never get heard of again


Offline Villatillidie25

  • Member
  • Posts: 693
Re: FFP
« Reply #3838 on: January 15, 2025, 01:27:11 PM »
Any system that makes selling your academy products the right thing to do in almost any circumstance is crap and completely at odds with other rules that were put in place to try to encourage teams to develop their own talent.

Again it is evidence that it props up the "big" teams like Chelsea and Cite£ as they have huge academys where they just sell off players every year.

For every cock up (Like Cole Palmer) there are lots of kids that are just bargaining chips that never get heard of again



It is but how do you create a set of rules that is equitable, encourages "right" behaviours when the starting playing field is soooo skewed. it's nigh on impossible. add to that the political / out for themselves mentality of every PL club (incl. us) and you'll never get a set of rules that gets passed by the majority.
The only option way I can see that can happen is for it to be dictated to clubs (via a regulator or UEFA/FIFA) but I assume that would just end in legal quagmire and/or be the beginning of clubs breaking away to form a Super League.

Offline Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 11343
Re: FFP
« Reply #3839 on: January 29, 2025, 10:41:59 PM »
So assuming we are going to be massively ok with duran sale?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal