collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Euro 2024 by TonyD
[Today at 12:52:13 AM]


Unai Emery - our manager by brontebilly
[Today at 12:49:02 AM]


Kits 24/25 by Drummond
[Today at 12:37:14 AM]


Samuel Iling Junior - nearly signed by AV84
[Today at 12:30:57 AM]


Golf 2024 by Villa Lew
[June 16, 2024, 11:43:09 PM]


Summer 2024 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[June 16, 2024, 11:14:05 PM]


Douglas Luiz - Confirmed confirmed by pablo_picasso
[June 16, 2024, 10:32:12 PM]


Other Games - 2023/24 by pauliewalnuts
[June 16, 2024, 10:15:19 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Euro 2024 by TonyD
[Today at 12:52:13 AM]


Re: Unai Emery - our manager by brontebilly
[Today at 12:49:02 AM]


Re: Euro 2024 by brontebilly
[Today at 12:47:38 AM]


Re: Kits 24/25 by Drummond
[Today at 12:37:14 AM]


Re: Samuel Iling Junior - nearly signed by AV84
[Today at 12:30:57 AM]


Re: Euro 2024 by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 12:27:37 AM]


Re: Euro 2024 by olaftab
[Today at 12:19:05 AM]


Re: Euro 2024 by john e
[Today at 12:13:37 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 203920 times)

Offline villadelph

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5155
  • | UTV | 215 |
  • GM : 20.05.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #2535 on: May 28, 2024, 08:00:50 PM »
Right thanks, is this being reported anywhere?

I assume this is whatís being talked about..? Makes sense to me.

Quote
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1904649/Premier-League-news-rule-change-Crystal-Palace-Aston-Villa

UEFAís coefficient payments currently uses a clubís last ten years of performances in European competitions when determining how finances are split. Thus, Manchester City are said to have received a significant £28million compared to Newcastleís £3.8m this season.

However, according to The Times, Crystal Palace have proposed that changed are made to the coefficient payments which could improve how English sides fare in top European competitions.

The changes would see the Premier Leagueís Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) to allow teams to claim the difference in coefficient funding between themselves and the top club in Europe as Ďallowable lossesí.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50345
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #2536 on: May 28, 2024, 08:01:29 PM »
Thanks.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 32682
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #2537 on: May 28, 2024, 08:10:47 PM »
Further, we have proposed a £30m increase in allowable losses for the last year of PSR. This will be voted on at the PL AGM in early June. Not sure if this is the same, or whether one proposal (either ours or Palaceís) will negate the need or want for the other.

Offline dalians umbrella

  • Member
  • Posts: 279
Re: FFP
« Reply #2538 on: May 28, 2024, 08:13:27 PM »
From the horse's mouth:

https://archive.ph/OWEUc

"The move by Palace is regarded as an alternative plan that would help Villa but not change the general PSR limit."

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 32682
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #2539 on: May 28, 2024, 08:23:19 PM »
From the horse's mouth:

https://archive.ph/OWEUc

"The move by Palace is regarded as an alternative plan that would help Villa but not change the general PSR limit."

Nice one.

Offline Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 5468
Re: FFP
« Reply #2540 on: May 28, 2024, 08:23:53 PM »
Im all for it personally

Online ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 30084
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: FFP
« Reply #2541 on: May 28, 2024, 08:28:12 PM »
The general limit should be moved for all clubs though. It's been stuck without any regard for fees or wages inflation.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25808
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #2542 on: May 28, 2024, 08:51:19 PM »
And didnt they out their own lawyer on the panel, or something?

UEFA put a representative, Citeh also put a representative, then the third one in independent. However IIRC the third person was someone who happened to work at the same law firm Citeh had paid to represent them on the case.

Offline jon collett

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Re: FFP
« Reply #2543 on: May 28, 2024, 09:09:11 PM »
Right thanks, is this being reported anywhere?

Itís being reported as something Crystal Palace are proposing but the only place Iíve seen it suggested as being likely to pass is on here.

It would need the support of 12 clubs wouldnít it?

Offline dalians umbrella

  • Member
  • Posts: 279
Re: FFP
« Reply #2544 on: May 28, 2024, 09:16:00 PM »
Right thanks, is this being reported anywhere?

Itís being reported as something Crystal Palace are proposing but the only place Iíve seen it suggested as being likely to pass is on here.

It would need the support of 12 clubs wouldnít it?

Yes, I donít see why any other clubs would want to help us out in this way and strengthen our chances of getting top 4 again next season. But then again, I donít see whatís in it for Palace, so maybe Iím missing something.

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35708
  • GM : 09.03.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #2545 on: May 28, 2024, 09:19:32 PM »
Yes, I donít see why any other clubs would want to help us out in this way and strengthen our chances of getting top 4 again next season. But then again, I donít see whatís in it for Palace, so maybe Iím missing something.

Given their end of season form, maybe they think they could be next season's surprise Champs League qualifiers. ;)

And of course, Villa have been very helpful to Palace in the past.

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 9750
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: FFP
« Reply #2546 on: May 28, 2024, 10:07:07 PM »
From the horse's mouth:

https://archive.ph/OWEUc

"The move by Palace is regarded as an alternative plan that would help Villa but not change the general PSR limit."

That makes a big difference to Villa (and other ambitious clubs).  It seems very logical, or am I looking through C&B glasses?  Would I feel the same if spurs got the benefit of the extra allowable losses?

The fact it impact so few clubs, yet strengthens the PL, means thereís a good chance it will get voted in right?

Offline garyellis

  • Member
  • Posts: 989
Re: FFP
« Reply #2547 on: May 28, 2024, 10:07:32 PM »
Yes, I donít see why any other clubs would want to help us out in this way and strengthen our chances of getting top 4 again next season. But then again, I donít see whatís in it for Palace, so maybe Iím missing something.

Given their end of season form, maybe they think they could be next season's surprise Champs League qualifiers. ;)

And of course, Villa have been very helpful to Palace in the past.
Maybe clubs should vote on the principle rather than preventing another progressing.

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35708
  • GM : 09.03.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #2548 on: May 28, 2024, 10:15:13 PM »
Yes, I donít see why any other clubs would want to help us out in this way and strengthen our chances of getting top 4 again next season. But then again, I donít see whatís in it for Palace, so maybe Iím missing something.

Given their end of season form, maybe they think they could be next season's surprise Champs League qualifiers. ;)

And of course, Villa have been very helpful to Palace in the past.

Maybe clubs should vote on the principle rather than preventing another progressing.

Too true, Parish is right that Uefaís coefficient payments seem unfair.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 32177
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: FFP
« Reply #2549 on: May 29, 2024, 10:41:29 AM »
From the horse's mouth:

https://archive.ph/OWEUc

"The move by Palace is regarded as an alternative plan that would help Villa but not change the general PSR limit."

That's my kinda rule change.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal