Both clubs will also limited in what they can spend with players on UEFA’s List A for club competitions having to hold a positive transfer balance, i.e. the cost of players added must not exceed those being removed.
Also does anyone know which financial year the women’s team sale was booked to? I assume it was 24/25 but anyone know for sure or is it a question of wait to see the accounts next March?
Chelsea’s punishment leaves them under pressure to make sales this summer before their return to the Champions League. Uefa’s judgment included the detail that Chelsea would be forbidden from including new players in their squad for Europe next season and in 2026-27 unless they can show they have generated a cost saving with sale of players against acquisitions.
Chelsea and Villa breached Uefa’s football earnings and squad-cost rules (SCR), the latter of which limits clubs operating in European competition to spending 80% of their revenue on player costs. Villa face being fined €5m for every year they breach financial rules. A new three-year cycle started in 2024-25.Villa are confident they can absorb the fine and strengthen Unai Emery’s squad while agreeing to move in line with SCR. Villa and Uefa are understood to have agreed a “glide path” to meet their targets. Villa, who are also confident of avoiding a possible points deduction from the Premier League after moving to sell their women’s team to comply with financial rules, are adamant they do not need to sell key players.
It feels like we've been pegged over a barrel by the UEFA accountants.
I think it’s safe to say there will be a couple of high profile departures as well. That could be why that Cash story was floating around this week. I’ll predict Martinez, Cash and Digne to go. Cheaper alternatives to replace them. Included in cheaper would I assume be chevalier.
There was a story saying we were trying to flog him but clubs were being put off by his £100k a week wages. I’ll add Bailey to the mix.