collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Pre season 2025 by Hillbilly
[Today at 05:07:46 AM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by tomd2103
[Today at 12:59:45 AM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Virgil Caine
[Today at 12:39:58 AM]


Leander Dendoncker by Toronto Villa
[Today at 12:32:05 AM]


Boxing 2025 by Rory
[August 06, 2025, 11:47:30 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by brontebilly
[August 06, 2025, 10:46:28 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[August 06, 2025, 10:35:07 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[August 06, 2025, 10:30:55 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Pre season 2025 by Hillbilly
[Today at 05:07:46 AM]


Re: Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by tomd2103
[Today at 12:59:45 AM]


Re: Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Virgil Caine
[Today at 12:39:58 AM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by Toronto Villa
[Today at 12:32:05 AM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by Beard82
[August 06, 2025, 11:49:53 PM]


Re: Boxing 2025 by Rory
[August 06, 2025, 11:47:30 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[August 06, 2025, 11:41:24 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Olneythelonely
[August 06, 2025, 11:37:40 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 496750 times)

Offline algy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6094
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Gogledd Cymru
  • GM : 26.03.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1470 on: March 08, 2024, 08:26:25 AM »
I've not looked in to the figures at all, but I'd be flabbergasted if we've spent 4 years in the Premier League with Purslow at the helm for much of that, yet have no idea how to balance the books for FFP.


Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35600
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #1471 on: March 08, 2024, 09:02:37 AM »
Posted this in the Diaby thread, more appropriate in here:

According to the accounts we only spent sixty-odd million in the last TWO transfer windows. I think there must be a few clauses in the reported fees for Torres and Diaby.

EDIT: Since the reporting period, £67.9m spent, £40.3m in sales. Better than I would have expected.

How are outgoing transfer fees accounted for? The money leaves us over the length of the contract signed doesn’t it? So is that accounted for in one hit or as a ‘future liability’ in the accounts?

As far as I understand, it’s the fee that is amortised over the length of the contract. The actual payments are a matter of negotiation I assume, hence Risso’s mention of contingent liabilities.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1472 on: March 08, 2024, 09:05:16 AM »
Posted this in the Diaby thread, more appropriate in here:

According to the accounts we only spent sixty-odd million in the last TWO transfer windows. I think there must be a few clauses in the reported fees for Torres and Diaby.

EDIT: Since the reporting period, £67.9m spent, £40.3m in sales. Better than I would have expected.

How are outgoing transfer fees accounted for? The money leaves us over the length of the contract signed doesn’t it? So is that accounted for in one hit or as a ‘future liability’ in the accounts?

As far as I understand, it’s the fee that is amortised over the length of the contract. The actual payments are a matter of negotiation I assume, hence Risso’s mention of contingent liabilities.

Correct. The contingent liability will be the stuff like "another £5m if Villa qualify for the Champions League", or X amount of games played etc.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15416
Re: FFP
« Reply #1473 on: March 08, 2024, 09:09:39 AM »
It would be good if all FFP figures/adjustments were a matter of public record.

Agree.  The media do not help as they’re quoting ‘accounting’ losses and then saying that clubs can lose £105m over three seasons.  They're linked but they’re not the same.

Surefire way of getting clicks from the local anti-Villa obsessives though.

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32858
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1474 on: March 08, 2024, 01:08:00 PM »
Grealish can get fucked.

Offline sewiek

  • Member
  • Posts: 87
Re: FFP
« Reply #1475 on: March 08, 2024, 04:20:17 PM »
On Joey Barton's podcast Keiran Maguire stated that the £105m figure was agreed in 2013. So clubs costs have skyrocketed whilst the losses are stuck in a figure agreed 11 years ago. Wages gone up, cost of players gone up, running costs, gas, electricity and water all gone up, food costs, catering costs, academy costs gone up, but you have to stay within an 11 year old agreed limit. There's the issue with FFP/PSR. Whilst financial costs have changed and gone up in an ever accelerated rate, it's been stuck in the past.

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10719
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #1476 on: March 08, 2024, 04:37:55 PM »
I realise I might be a bit of an outlier here, but maybe a lot of the owners don't want to lose even more money?

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35512
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: FFP
« Reply #1477 on: March 08, 2024, 04:39:51 PM »
I realise I might be a bit of an outlier here, but maybe a lot of the owners don't want to lose even more money?

You can just imagine Doug with a system in place that meant he didn't have to spend but couldn't be blamed for it, would've been all of his Christmases at once.

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10719
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #1478 on: March 08, 2024, 04:42:06 PM »
Its absolutely mad isn't it, we have just lost £120m, we've looked down the back of the sofa and in that jacket we wore last week but no, its gone. And we want the rules changed so we can lose more.

Crackpot.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22829
  • Location: Salop
Re: FFP
« Reply #1479 on: March 08, 2024, 05:06:40 PM »
On Joey Barton's podcast

You lost me at this point.

Offline Baldy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1364
  • Location: Little Island somewhere
Re: FFP
« Reply #1480 on: March 08, 2024, 05:51:22 PM »
Just saw on news, it is quite likely Leicester CXity broke FFP rules in their last season in Premier League.

If they get promoted, could be deducted points next season. 

Offline Stu

  • Member
  • Posts: 14003
  • GM : 09.04.2021
Re: FFP
« Reply #1481 on: March 08, 2024, 06:08:08 PM »
It’s a fucking farce

Offline VinnieChase84

  • Member
  • Posts: 3019
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: FFP
« Reply #1482 on: March 08, 2024, 06:40:26 PM »
There’s a meeting in June regarding FFP and it’s “future”
It’s beyond clear current system isn’t fit for purpose

One proposed format is a % of wage turnover with clubs lower down in the league having a greater percentage and then on a sliding scale it’s reduced as you move “up” the league

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74482
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #1483 on: March 08, 2024, 07:03:54 PM »
There’s a meeting in June regarding FFP and it’s “future”
It’s beyond clear current system isn’t fit for purpose

Yeah, that's pretty clear really.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35600
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #1484 on: March 08, 2024, 08:57:35 PM »
On Joey Barton's podcast

You lost me at this point.

I’m surprised Maguire is so desperate for clicks & views.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal