collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Harvey Elliott by paul_e
[Today at 02:07:21 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 02:06:55 PM]


Emi Martinez by andyh
[Today at 02:05:18 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by liam
[Today at 01:53:34 PM]


Jadon Sancho by Villatillidie25
[Today at 01:52:50 PM]


Ramón Rodríguez Verdejo (AKA Monchi) by Drummond
[Today at 01:48:06 PM]


Victor Lindelöf by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 01:29:23 PM]


FFP by Toronto Villa
[Today at 01:27:57 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Harvey Elliott by paul_e
[Today at 02:07:21 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 02:06:55 PM]


Re: Harvey Elliott by frank black
[Today at 02:05:38 PM]


Re: Emi Martinez by andyh
[Today at 02:05:18 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by lovejoy
[Today at 02:04:16 PM]


Re: Harvey Elliott by KRS
[Today at 02:02:46 PM]


Re: Emi Martinez by cdbearsfan
[Today at 02:01:45 PM]


Re: Harvey Elliott by LeeB
[Today at 02:01:41 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ross Barkley  (Read 306051 times)

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43267
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #780 on: February 03, 2021, 10:08:32 PM »
Woeful tonight.

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29336
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #781 on: February 03, 2021, 10:08:41 PM »
With them doubling up on Jack, this was made for him tonight, but he rivalled Martinez for most inept performer.

And he has a lot less goodwill in the bank than Martinez.

Online PhilVill

  • Member
  • Posts: 710
  • Location: Carlisle
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #782 on: February 03, 2021, 10:09:04 PM »
Big no from me, sorry chaps. Give me two hungry champ players for that money every day.

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10854
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #783 on: February 03, 2021, 10:11:14 PM »
We know he's not good enough without the ball but he combined that with being woeful with it tonight, did well to last as long as he did. How he had the cheek to complain at his being subbed is laughable.

Just not fit enough for the side

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 23092
  • Location: Salop
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #784 on: February 03, 2021, 10:13:24 PM »
It's a no from me as well. We know he can be a decent player on his day but we're not in a position to carry someone whose days come around so rarely.

Online rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9700
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #785 on: February 03, 2021, 10:14:14 PM »
Good player when chips are good.

Not someone I want permanently. IF he had become the player he should have he would be a Champs League regular. File him next to Wilshere and DannyBoy Sturridge in 3 years time. Lingard will be there too

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26499
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #786 on: February 03, 2021, 10:14:19 PM »
File under luxury player, not for me either.

Online brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11306
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #787 on: February 03, 2021, 10:15:14 PM »
Seemed to be running in treacle tonight. I’m far from convinced.

Reminded me of Ross McCormack. Carrying timber too. Disgraceful lack of effort without the ball. Didn't try a leg when moved to a midfield three. Not sure where this guy gets his ego from but he certainly isn't good enough with the ball to get away with his walking efforts without it. Throwing a bit of a strop getting taken off too, stayed on 15 mins too long for me.

Offline PeterWithe

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10854
  • Location: Birmingham.
  • GM : 05.03.2026
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #788 on: February 03, 2021, 10:16:06 PM »
To be fair he wasn't the only one to have a stinker tonight, most did. And we were still not as terrible as we've seen in other seasons

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43971
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #789 on: February 03, 2021, 10:32:53 PM »
He's the new David Bentley.

Online Steve67

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13975
  • Location: Down south now. Born in Aston.
  • GM : 08.12.2025
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #790 on: February 03, 2021, 11:08:33 PM »
I know he has been out injured for a few games but we are now over half a season in and he has had what, three good games in that period? He really needs to be far more consistent if we are going to shell out the kind of money that he will cost us.

Offline TelfordVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #791 on: February 03, 2021, 11:13:25 PM »
Not for me. There will be better options for 20million plus.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #792 on: February 03, 2021, 11:15:51 PM »
In terms of consistency of performance and his injury record, against his likely wages, it's a no from me.  Shame, he's got it in him to be a brilliant player, but you can see why at the age of 27 he's never really nailed it anywhere.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55511
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #793 on: February 03, 2021, 11:19:42 PM »
Don’t really see the need to make a decision now. When he’s been on it he’s been excellent, but at the moment he’s not. He strikes me as an instinctual player, but he’s out of form and he’s over thinking and ponderous at the moment. Hopefully he can rediscover his spark in the coming weeks.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15467
Re: Ross Barkley - signed
« Reply #794 on: February 03, 2021, 11:24:05 PM »
A bit of a tough ask to come back in and play as many games as he has in a short space of time, but he looked very sluggish tonight especially in comparison to Lingard.  Can't help but think Grealish or McGinn would be more effective in that role at the moment. 

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal