The only time at which I personally touched briefly on the potential future of VP was when the firm of architects for whom I worked were commissioned to find hotel sites on or near the M6 by a French hotel chain. They fancied VP but we could not make access work without a lump of Aston Park. So we moved on.
The old stand had to go because it looked lovely but wasn't suitable for the modern age. I don't know whether any significant part could have been saved but it was definitely said that the mosaic and gable were staying. The design of the new one is perfectly fine and there's a lot to commend it but the overall finish was done on the cheap. A comparatively small amount extra could have made it something special.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on May 15, 2020, 12:59:48 PMThe old stand had to go because it looked lovely but wasn't suitable for the modern age. I don't know whether any significant part could have been saved but it was definitely said that the mosaic and gable were staying. The design of the new one is perfectly fine and there's a lot to commend it but the overall finish was done on the cheap. A comparatively small amount extra could have made it something special.As an earlier poster said, given the effort put into the facade of the Holte it seems stupid then finish the Trinity as it is.Stupid unless your prime motivation is the accumulation of pennies, of course.Lot's of our ground works ended up 'in house', didn't they? The Master Businessman also liked to be a Master Builder too.
I remember see the finished new Trinity for the first time, walking down from Aston station toward the Holte and thinking how cheap it looked.
The external entrance couldn’t be any worse if it tried... even 90s smoked glass would look better than the hotch potch of doors and glass...