collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: MOTD  (Read 263398 times)

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8271
  • GM : 01.11.2024
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1095 on: December 10, 2023, 10:01:37 PM »
I don’t think we are under represented in the media. There is Townsend, Hendrie, Dublin, Warnock, O’Neill, Smith, Sutton, Richards, Lescott, Agbonlahor, Jenas. The problem is that the ones who have any credibility/ gravitas have minimal affiliation with us. Ultimately this is because we have been largely shit for the last 25 years. Good players haven’t tended to spend much time with us. What do we realistically expect?
The above have varying affection towards Villa like you say. Though Townsend, Dublin, Hendrix and Alan Smith always back us. Gabby exaggeratedly so!
You can also add Keown generally though his true loyalty was shown that even though he also shows respect about Villa in game last season he was celebrating Arsenal win at Villa Park
Other notable pundit mentions of Villa linkage in mainstream media
Crouch , Sidwell, Joe Cole, Enni Aluko, Shay Given, Darren Bent, Anita Asante and of course Paul Merson and Tim Sherwood who do sky soccer scores.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2023, 10:05:15 PM by Footy-Vill »

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 40355
  • GM : 09.03.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1096 on: December 10, 2023, 10:52:27 PM »
I don’t think we are under represented in the media. There is Townsend, Hendrie, Dublin, Warnock, O’Neill, Smith, Sutton, Richards, Lescott, Agbonlahor, Jenas. The problem is that the ones who have any credibility/ gravitas have minimal affiliation with us. Ultimately this is because we have been largely shit for the last 25 years. Good players haven’t tended to spend much time with us. What do we realistically expect?

I'd largely agree with this. Without thinking or indeed caring too much about it, I'd say Chelsea are probably under represented in the media given the success they've had in the last 25 years.

Online DrGonzo

  • Member
  • Posts: 5941
  • Age: 45
  • Location: Over the border, under the hill, on the farm.
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1097 on: December 10, 2023, 10:58:45 PM »
Given and Richards tonight XD

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9061
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1098 on: December 10, 2023, 11:13:41 PM »
Oh surprise Spurs on first

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 40355
  • GM : 09.03.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1099 on: December 11, 2023, 12:33:50 AM »
MOTD2 noteworthy for Pep not getting the badge in, and Micah not guffawing.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 51919
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1100 on: December 11, 2023, 07:03:20 AM »
Just listened to the Totally Football show and it was nice that in the 7/8 mins on the game they pretty much exclusively talked about Villa and did not mention the non-penalty or the non-handball.

Online rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 8881
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1101 on: December 11, 2023, 08:01:38 AM »
Just listened to the Totally Football show and it was nice that in the 7/8 mins on the game they pretty much exclusively talked about Villa and did not mention the non-penalty or the non-handball.

Sounds like people doing their job right

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28087
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1102 on: December 11, 2023, 08:44:06 AM »
Oh surprise Spurs on first

4-0 and the two challengers for a top 5 finish, why wouldn't it be?

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9061
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1103 on: December 11, 2023, 11:28:24 AM »
Man City first ? or Fulham (5-0) but no Spurs due to the BBC bias

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 44739
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1104 on: December 11, 2023, 11:36:30 AM »
Man City first ? or Fulham (5-0) but no Spurs due to the BBC bias

Why do you think that a routine win for the Champions against the team everybody thought and probably still thinks is going to be relegated or a game between two mid-table clubs is more interesting than a game between two clubs who are hoping to finish in the top four?

If either of those two matches were more interesting then you'd have a point. But they weren't.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28087
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1105 on: December 11, 2023, 11:48:57 AM »
Man City first ? or Fulham (5-0) but no Spurs due to the BBC bias

Why those should either of those two been first? Goals scored. Well both had 5 goals. City, wouldn't you have just been going "City first, typical bias". I suspect if Luton had won, they might have leapt into first place.

BTW, Fulham won 5-0 last Wednesday as well. Why weren't you complaining they weren't first over a 1-0 victory match then?

Online Richard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2386
  • GM : 08.06.2024
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1106 on: December 11, 2023, 12:04:37 PM »
I am more convinced than ever that VillaTim is Flinstone!!

Offline VillaTim

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9061
  • Location: The Co-op, Inveraray.
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1107 on: December 11, 2023, 12:18:22 PM »
ok, why were Spurs on first ?

Offline Simon Page

  • Member
  • Posts: 5351
  • Location: Oh to be in the very north North Stand
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1108 on: December 11, 2023, 12:21:52 PM »
Because topish of the table trumps middish-table. Personally I'd have been tempted by Everton v West London's Third Best Team, but that's just going by scorelines. Didn't watch any of them. Maybe the Nearly Men Derby was better.

I really wouldn't worry too much about it.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28087
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: MOTD
« Reply #1109 on: December 11, 2023, 12:24:21 PM »
I already told you, because it was 5th v 7th with the winner going 5th, and there was 5 goals in the match. Would they have been first if it was 1-0? Probably depending on the Citeh result because it was still 5th v 7th with the winner going 5th.

The question I asked to you though. Why were you not complaining Fulham should have been first on MOTD last Wednesday? Afterall they won 5-0 the same as yesterday.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal