So why are we doing a part chop and not just cash?
What difference does it make? Any financial issues we might have (and I'm not convinced they are remotely as serious as the press are portraying) are balance sheet related not cashflow issues so I see no reason why an exchange isn't perfectly reasonable.
Well Juventus seem to be the only ones wanting to buy now but they haven't got the cash, we don't want to strengthen a rival team by letting him go there, so we are cooking the books a little bit on valuation?
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on June 13, 2024, 07:31:35 PMNot sure the climate will be a decision maker unless he loves snow. Turin gets an average annual snowfall of 163cm. It's bloody cold up there. He should have held out for a move to Sporting!That can't be right, man. Turin in winter is dull and foggy with some rain but not a lot of snow. Pretty nice city though. Though not as nice as Lisbon, I grant you.
Not sure the climate will be a decision maker unless he loves snow. Turin gets an average annual snowfall of 163cm. It's bloody cold up there. He should have held out for a move to Sporting!
Quote from: paul_e on June 14, 2024, 05:22:23 PMWhat difference does it make? Any financial issues we might have (and I'm not convinced they are remotely as serious as the press are portraying) are balance sheet related not cashflow issues so I see no reason why an exchange isn't perfectly reasonable.If we had the cash instead would we spend it on Iling-Junior and Mckennie?
I'd rather have someone that didn't fit at Leeds than someone who did.
Quote from: enigma on June 14, 2024, 05:25:35 PMQuote from: paul_e on June 14, 2024, 05:22:23 PMWhat difference does it make? Any financial issues we might have (and I'm not convinced they are remotely as serious as the press are portraying) are balance sheet related not cashflow issues so I see no reason why an exchange isn't perfectly reasonable.If we had the cash instead would we spend it on Iling-Junior and Mckennie?I have no idea and nor does anyone else on here, but to flip that question around do you honestly think a manager as meticulous as Emery would accept them both coming in if he didn't think they were adding something? Pragmatism isn't a bad thing and if it's true that Luiz doesn't want to sign a new deal and that he's asked to be able to talk to Juve (both are very likely) then taking a very good yongster and someone who will make us harder to dominate in midfield doesn't seem like we've been fucked over massively. I'd have liked a little more for him but truthfully there are only a few clubs outside England that could him and I'm much happier for him to go abroad than having to see him in a fucking Arsenal shirt.
It felt a bit naive not using the Finn Azaz sale to lever out Rogers. IF we wanted those players, I'm glad we're pushing for it as part of the deal, rather than having to play chicken for them in August.To me, McKennie seems like a bit of a compromise, prob no better than Sanson, but I'm looking forward to seeing what Emery sees in him.
Quote from: chrisw1 on June 14, 2024, 06:00:53 PMIt felt a bit naive not using the Finn Azaz sale to lever out Rogers. IF we wanted those players, I'm glad we're pushing for it as part of the deal, rather than having to play chicken for them in August.To me, McKennie seems like a bit of a compromise, prob no better than Sanson, but I'm looking forward to seeing what Emery sees in him.I don't completely disagree but I just don't think Emery would give it a thumbs up if he didn't think McKennie was good enough to do a job for him and his physicality does help us wit the biggest weakness. I don't like that we're losing Doug to get it but, to me, it seems like Barkley wil lbe the Luiz replacement and that's a bigger worry for me than McKennie coming in to replace Dendoncker.