If it's in doubt, which it sounds like it is, shouldn't they stick with the original decision? Did he give the penalty before checking with VAR, or not give it then change his mind after consulting the technology?
You turn your back you get everything you deserve.
There is a school of thought in refereeing circles where the interpretation is “ gaining an unfair advantage “.Completely wrong in my opinion but you see this all the time.
It was, he looked at the ball as he jumped and his arm went wider. Handball but attempting to make it look like it wasn't.
Quote from: Ads on March 07, 2019, 12:55:19 PMYou turn your back you get everything you deserve.I'm sticking to Matthew 5:38-40.
I thought VAR was going to be there for the referee to refer to - ie. so the ref can ask for video assistance if he's not sure about a decision. If VAR can interfere like it did last night it's effectively VAR that's reffing the game. In which case we might as well remove all responsibility from the bloke on the pitch and just have a panel watching on tellies and telling him when to blow his whistle. That way there'll never be any wrong decisions, ever.