Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on April 29, 2019, 10:56:24 AMQuote from: darren woolley on April 29, 2019, 10:23:57 AMI hope he get's it overturned before the Norwich game and that cheat Bamford get's a three game ban instead.I hope not. I'd prefer to see him playing up front for Leeds. He's shit.Kemar Roofe is a much better striker for way Leeds play.I know who I'd rather see upfront for them if we meet again in PO final.
Quote from: darren woolley on April 29, 2019, 10:23:57 AMI hope he get's it overturned before the Norwich game and that cheat Bamford get's a three game ban instead.I hope not. I'd prefer to see him playing up front for Leeds. He's shit.
I hope he get's it overturned before the Norwich game and that cheat Bamford get's a three game ban instead.
Quote from: darren woolley on April 29, 2019, 10:23:57 AMI hope he get's it overturned before the Norwich game and that cheat Bamford get's a three game ban instead.this would only be fair in my opinion, a straight red is a 3 game ban.UTVThe Doc
Quote from: Dazvillain on April 29, 2019, 11:41:00 AMQuote from: cheltenhamlion on April 29, 2019, 10:34:26 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 10:22:13 AMQuote from: XXVilla on April 29, 2019, 10:16:44 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 09:43:54 AMThere's no doubt it will be over turned in plenty of time for Norwich so no need to panic about that.I wouldn't be surprised if we get another fine for failing to control players though. Not that I think we deserve it, but the players actions - particularly Hourihane - were far worse than against Blues.The only silver lining is I don't see how Bamford can avoid a ban.Wasn’t he given a card as a result of the incident though which means he can’t be given a retrospective punishment? Not for simulation he wasn't.Bamford's yellow was for his assault on Hourihane, not for play acting. He can still get picked up retrospectively and should receive a 2 game ban. El Ghazi's red will be overturned by the end of tomorrow I would imagine. It at same time it’s possible that Hourihane will get a ban for his punch to stomach / ribs That is quite possible as well.
Quote from: cheltenhamlion on April 29, 2019, 10:34:26 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 10:22:13 AMQuote from: XXVilla on April 29, 2019, 10:16:44 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 09:43:54 AMThere's no doubt it will be over turned in plenty of time for Norwich so no need to panic about that.I wouldn't be surprised if we get another fine for failing to control players though. Not that I think we deserve it, but the players actions - particularly Hourihane - were far worse than against Blues.The only silver lining is I don't see how Bamford can avoid a ban.Wasn’t he given a card as a result of the incident though which means he can’t be given a retrospective punishment? Not for simulation he wasn't.Bamford's yellow was for his assault on Hourihane, not for play acting. He can still get picked up retrospectively and should receive a 2 game ban. El Ghazi's red will be overturned by the end of tomorrow I would imagine. It at same time it’s possible that Hourihane will get a ban for his punch to stomach / ribs
Quote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 10:22:13 AMQuote from: XXVilla on April 29, 2019, 10:16:44 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 09:43:54 AMThere's no doubt it will be over turned in plenty of time for Norwich so no need to panic about that.I wouldn't be surprised if we get another fine for failing to control players though. Not that I think we deserve it, but the players actions - particularly Hourihane - were far worse than against Blues.The only silver lining is I don't see how Bamford can avoid a ban.Wasn’t he given a card as a result of the incident though which means he can’t be given a retrospective punishment? Not for simulation he wasn't.Bamford's yellow was for his assault on Hourihane, not for play acting. He can still get picked up retrospectively and should receive a 2 game ban. El Ghazi's red will be overturned by the end of tomorrow I would imagine.
Quote from: XXVilla on April 29, 2019, 10:16:44 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 09:43:54 AMThere's no doubt it will be over turned in plenty of time for Norwich so no need to panic about that.I wouldn't be surprised if we get another fine for failing to control players though. Not that I think we deserve it, but the players actions - particularly Hourihane - were far worse than against Blues.The only silver lining is I don't see how Bamford can avoid a ban.Wasn’t he given a card as a result of the incident though which means he can’t be given a retrospective punishment? Not for simulation he wasn't.
Quote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 09:43:54 AMThere's no doubt it will be over turned in plenty of time for Norwich so no need to panic about that.I wouldn't be surprised if we get another fine for failing to control players though. Not that I think we deserve it, but the players actions - particularly Hourihane - were far worse than against Blues.The only silver lining is I don't see how Bamford can avoid a ban.Wasn’t he given a card as a result of the incident though which means he can’t be given a retrospective punishment?
There's no doubt it will be over turned in plenty of time for Norwich so no need to panic about that.I wouldn't be surprised if we get another fine for failing to control players though. Not that I think we deserve it, but the players actions - particularly Hourihane - were far worse than against Blues.The only silver lining is I don't see how Bamford can avoid a ban.
Quote from: cheltenhamlion on April 29, 2019, 11:53:01 AMQuote from: Dazvillain on April 29, 2019, 11:41:00 AMQuote from: cheltenhamlion on April 29, 2019, 10:34:26 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 10:22:13 AMQuote from: XXVilla on April 29, 2019, 10:16:44 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on April 29, 2019, 09:43:54 AMThere's no doubt it will be over turned in plenty of time for Norwich so no need to panic about that.I wouldn't be surprised if we get another fine for failing to control players though. Not that I think we deserve it, but the players actions - particularly Hourihane - were far worse than against Blues.The only silver lining is I don't see how Bamford can avoid a ban.Wasn’t he given a card as a result of the incident though which means he can’t be given a retrospective punishment? Not for simulation he wasn't.Bamford's yellow was for his assault on Hourihane, not for play acting. He can still get picked up retrospectively and should receive a 2 game ban. El Ghazi's red will be overturned by the end of tomorrow I would imagine. It at same time it’s possible that Hourihane will get a ban for his punch to stomach / ribs That is quite possible as well.If the ref or linesman had seen Hourihane do that he might have been sent off for violent conduct. You can't just go up and jab a bloke in the ribs. That was a twat thing to do as much as he was defending his teammates.
Well the incidents are now being analysed on SSN, and I get the feeling the following will happen on official review:1. El Ghazi red card rescinded.2. Bamford charged with deceiving officials and receive 2 game ban.3. Hourihane charge with violent conduct and possible 3 game ban.3. Both teams charged with failing to control players and fined.I agree the “punch” was a nonsense and was so soft that their player didn’t react, however I think they will charge him for the action and intent.
Quote from: KRS on April 29, 2019, 02:31:34 PMWell the incidents are now being analysed on SSN, and I get the feeling the following will happen on official review:1. El Ghazi red card rescinded.2. Bamford charged with deceiving officials and receive 2 game ban.3. Hourihane charge with violent conduct and possible 3 game ban.3. Both teams charged with failing to control players and fined.I agree the “punch” was a nonsense and was so soft that their player didn’t react, however I think they will charge him for the action and intent.Agreed in principle, but a 2 match ban to equal Bamford's. It would be a massive fuck you from the FA to Villa if they took our request for a review and turned that into banning our player for longer than the Leeds lad. I'm not saying they wouldn't do it as they are daft eejits at the best of times, but I'd like to think some level of common sense would prevail.
violent conduct is a 3 match ban, he only punched him softly isn't really much of a defence.
He goes to punch him, that the player hardly reacts is a credit to him but doesn't change it being violent conduct, I really don't get why anyone is trying to defend that. If that had been a sha player on Jack there'd almost certainly be zero attempts on here to play it down.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on April 29, 2019, 03:37:30 PMHe goes to punch him, that the player hardly reacts is a credit to him but doesn't change it being violent conduct, I really don't get why anyone is trying to defend that. If that had been a sha player on Jack there'd almost certainly be zero attempts on here to play it down. "He goes to punch him"What does that even mean? Has he punched him or not, in your view?If he has, why the total lack of reaction?