collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Unai Emery by danno
[Today at 12:14:39 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Tuscans
[Today at 12:12:19 PM]


Aston Villa Women 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 12:10:18 PM]


Alex Moreno - Gone by danno
[Today at 12:04:49 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by paul_e
[Today at 11:47:27 AM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by paul_e
[Today at 11:41:52 AM]


Squad 25/26 by brontebilly
[Today at 11:29:00 AM]


Kits 25/26 by Tuscans
[Today at 11:08:34 AM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Bruce Sacked at last (now official)  (Read 2416388 times)

Online brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11173
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17295 on: August 15, 2018, 03:08:53 PM »
No one is unhappy with the wins, but I think it's perfectly reasonable to think winning games whilst we're playing like this is unsustainable and, over a season, it will probably not be enough.

If we carry on with Bruce for a while I at least want to see him realise that he was a big part of the reason for us not getting promotion and start to look in the mirror a bit more.  The comments last night are getting a lot of attention because they're the same things he's said numerous times in the last 2 years and yet the problems haven't changed or ever really been properly addressed other than to throw more and more new players at it and see what happens.

What I took from his post game comments was that he was putting pressure on the board to close out the couple of loans he has lined up. He has been under pressure from supporters and possibly now at board level to play younger players.

I do think he has a very valid point in that if some of our young players aren't able to thrive away to Yeovil then maybe they aren't ready to play a significant part in a promotion chasing side.  Of course it conveniently ignores that some of his signings, Taylor, Bree, Lansbury, Hogan aren't up to it either...

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37290
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17296 on: August 15, 2018, 03:20:37 PM »
No one is unhappy with the wins, but I think it's perfectly reasonable to think winning games whilst we're playing like this is unsustainable and, over a season, it will probably not be enough.

If we carry on with Bruce for a while I at least want to see him realise that he was a big part of the reason for us not getting promotion and start to look in the mirror a bit more.  The comments last night are getting a lot of attention because they're the same things he's said numerous times in the last 2 years and yet the problems haven't changed or ever really been properly addressed other than to throw more and more new players at it and see what happens.

What I took from his post game comments was that he was putting pressure on the board to close out the couple of loans he has lined up. He has been under pressure from supporters and possibly now at board level to play younger players.

I do think he has a very valid point in that if some of our young players aren't able to thrive away to Yeovil then maybe they aren't ready to play a significant part in a promotion chasing side.  Of course it conveniently ignores that some of his signings, Taylor, Bree, Lansbury, Hogan aren't up to it either...

The latter is important because if you add 3-4 'kids' then the job of the senior players is, in part, to help them settle by providing a solid foundation.  If they're not giving that it's very easy for the kids to get lost.  Look at Doyle-Hayes for example, he was playing very safe, especially after he got booked which meant he looked very timid. Whelan and Hourihane needed to take the pressure off him but he was probably the best of the 3 of them in the first half.

Offline themossman

  • Member
  • Posts: 10107
  • Location: Bristol
  • GM : 06.05.2022
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17297 on: August 15, 2018, 03:25:56 PM »
If that’s what he’s attempting to do then he’s a prick. Basically sacrificing young unfinished players to make a play for more signings, on top of the ones he’s already brought in which haven’t worked.

There is definitely a bit of that about him. Fake avuncular bollocks masking a Teflon ‘it wasn’t me gov’ instinct for blame avoidance.

E.g. XYZ wasn’t ready for that game. It was my fault for playing him so blame me because I can take it but  I’m going to repeatedly highlight the fact that he had a shocker. Very transparent tactic.

Offline Clark W Griswold

  • Member
  • Posts: 5239
  • Location: Wallyworld
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17298 on: August 15, 2018, 04:22:18 PM »
Wouldn't surprise me at all. I also often think he may have been behind the assassination of JFK, could have been the mastermind behind 9/11 and he's most probably king of the Lizard people too.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35572
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17299 on: August 15, 2018, 04:28:05 PM »
Wouldn't surprise me at all. I also often think he may have been behind the assassination of JFK, could have been the mastermind behind 9/11 and he's most probably king of the Lizard people too.

The club need to release a statement on social media of some kind to refute these claims.

But they won't, because they're in on it too. The bastards.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17300 on: August 15, 2018, 04:32:56 PM »
Wouldn't surprise me at all. I also often think he may have been behind the assassination of JFK, could have been the mastermind behind 9/11 and he's most probably king of the Lizard people too.

The club need to release a statement on social media of some kind to refute these claims.

But they won't, because they're in on it too. The bastards.

Still waiting for the club to release a statement detailing Bruce's movements on the night the People's Princess perished in Paris.

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17301 on: August 15, 2018, 04:35:41 PM »
Wouldn't surprise me at all. I also often think he may have been behind the assassination of JFK, could have been the mastermind behind 9/11 and he's most probably king of the Lizard people too.

The club need to release a statement on social media of some kind to refute these claims.

But they won't, because they're in on it too. The bastards.

Still waiting for the club to release a statement detailing Bruce's movements on the night the People's Princess perished in Paris.

Knowing his diet, it's not going to be pretty.

Offline Clark W Griswold

  • Member
  • Posts: 5239
  • Location: Wallyworld
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17302 on: August 15, 2018, 04:47:46 PM »
Wouldn't surprise me at all. I also often think he may have been behind the assassination of JFK, could have been the mastermind behind 9/11 and he's most probably king of the Lizard people too.

The club need to release a statement on social media of some kind to refute these claims.

But they won't, because they're in on it too. The bastards.

Still waiting for the club to release a statement detailing Bruce's movements on the night the People's Princess perished in Paris.

Well he was mates with Cantona back in 97 so that puts him in France, we just need a link to mopeds and scooters. I'm sure I heard someone say he's a former mod. The evidence is building...

Online Tayls_7

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4630
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Lincoln
  • GM : 14.10.2025
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17303 on: August 15, 2018, 07:01:07 PM »
Wouldn't surprise me at all. I also often think he may have been behind the assassination of JFK, could have been the mastermind behind 9/11 and he's most probably king of the Lizard people too.

The club need to release a statement on social media of some kind to refute these claims.

But they won't, because they're in on it too. The bastards.

Still waiting for the club to release a statement detailing Bruce's movements on the night the People's Princess perished in Paris.

Well he was mates with Cantona back in 97 so that puts him in France, we just need a link to mopeds and scooters. I'm sure I heard someone say he's a former mod. The evidence is building...

This is ridiculous.  He's not old enough to have been involved in JFK's assassination.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17304 on: August 15, 2018, 07:06:58 PM »
HAS ANYBODY SEEN HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!

Again, a statement from the club would help clear things up.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30281
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17305 on: August 15, 2018, 07:19:37 PM »
He turned me into a newt.

I got better.

Online Tayls_7

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4630
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Lincoln
  • GM : 14.10.2025
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17306 on: August 15, 2018, 07:26:42 PM »
Nigel Reo Coker assassinated JFK.

Offline themossman

  • Member
  • Posts: 10107
  • Location: Bristol
  • GM : 06.05.2022
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17307 on: August 15, 2018, 07:35:01 PM »
Laugh? I almost did.

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18167
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17308 on: August 15, 2018, 08:44:02 PM »
I'm sorry, but I cannot be having any comments made by someone who didn't even watch the game in any shape or form.  Utterly ridiculous.
Thanks, Des.
Ridiculous indeed.
Are you suggesting that everyone on here who posts has watched every game? At least I was being honest!
I’ve watched enough Bruciegames to guess what might have happened and - along with the hyperbole of the match thread and national media - can piece together what happened.
But - whatever.






Oh, it was your irony; okay!

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18167
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Bruce staying
« Reply #17309 on: August 15, 2018, 08:50:22 PM »
I fail to seee how winning any game at any level can be a debacle ...
I’m sure there have been ...
‘Debacle’ was a word I took from those who had been there or were commenting on it.
Maybe I shouldn’t take posters so seriously.

Nonetheless ...




... ok: maybe not.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal