collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Post match Villa 2 Burnley 1 by tomd2103
[Today at 10:16:00 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by exigo
[Today at 10:04:32 PM]


Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by stevo_st
[Today at 09:58:59 PM]


Lamare Bogarde by Steve67
[Today at 09:36:27 PM]


Unai Emery by Steve67
[Today at 09:34:34 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Toronto Villa
[Today at 08:42:09 PM]


Ross Barkley by RamboandBruno
[Today at 06:38:52 PM]


Pau Torres by Mister E
[Today at 05:06:23 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Post match Villa 2 Burnley 1 by tomd2103
[Today at 10:16:00 PM]


Re: Post match Villa 2 Burnley 1 by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 10:15:04 PM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by exigo
[Today at 10:04:32 PM]


Re: Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by stevo_st
[Today at 09:58:59 PM]


Re: Lamare Bogarde by Steve67
[Today at 09:36:27 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by Steve67
[Today at 09:34:34 PM]


Re: Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Beard82
[Today at 09:33:02 PM]


Re: Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Steve67
[Today at 09:31:55 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Scott Hogan - retired  (Read 317042 times)

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1770 on: February 08, 2020, 06:32:10 PM »
A hot steaming pile of garbage for player, 2 in 2 or not. A truly abysmal signing on our behalf.


Fence sitter  ;)

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55917
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1771 on: February 08, 2020, 07:06:37 PM »
Honestly Blues are pretty meaningless. If they need our reserves so be it.

Offline john e

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20711
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1772 on: February 08, 2020, 08:23:45 PM »
Honestly Blues are pretty meaningless. If they need our reserves so be it.

yet when we had the pitch invasion and were celebrating getting through to a Wembley final
 the song went up ‘Birmingham are you listening’ 
meaningless maybe but still are ultimate rivals bar none


Offline Aldridge Villa

  • Member
  • Posts: 893
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1773 on: February 08, 2020, 08:55:24 PM »
Don’t really understand why such an innocuous player who admittedly never hit the heights at B6 (through no lack of effort) is still subject to quite vehement criticism . Let him move on and get a game.




Offline Dr_Pangloss

  • Member
  • Posts: 17
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1774 on: February 09, 2020, 11:58:34 AM »
Don’t really understand why such an innocuous player who admittedly never hit the heights at B6 (through no lack of effort) is still subject to quite vehement criticism . Let him move on and get a game.

Probably because he cost an incredible amount of money (for the Championship) and simply did not deliver, putting in a string of absolutely woefully inept performances.

That said it's not his fault we were stupid enough to pay what we did for him. He always was and always will be a very average Championship level striker.

Offline nigel

  • Member
  • Posts: 5786
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1775 on: February 09, 2020, 04:22:46 PM »
Don’t really understand why such an innocuous player who admittedly never hit the heights at B6 (through no lack of effort) is still subject to quite vehement criticism . Let him move on and get a game.

Probably because he cost an incredible amount of money (for the Championship) and simply did not deliver, putting in a string of absolutely woefully inept performances.

That said it's not his fault we were stupid enough to pay what we did for him. He always was and always will be a very average Championship level striker.

Was all down to Brucey.
Bought McCormack, played him wrong (or was that RDM?)
Bought Hogan, played him wrong

Sometimes players are not suited to a style of play and this was the main issue with Hogan.

I’m not surprised he’s doing ok a Small Heath.
Can only benefit us when we sell at end of season.

Offline rougegorge

  • Member
  • Posts: 1629
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1776 on: February 09, 2020, 04:51:50 PM »
Don’t really understand why such an innocuous player who admittedly never hit the heights at B6 (through no lack of effort) is still subject to quite vehement criticism . Let him move on and get a game.

Probably because he cost an incredible amount of money (for the Championship) and simply did not deliver, putting in a string of absolutely woefully inept performances.

That said it's not his fault we were stupid enough to pay what we did for him. He always was and always will be a very average Championship level striker.

Was all down to Brucey.
Bought McCormack, played him wrong (or was that RDM?)
Bought Hogan, played him wrong

Sometimes players are not suited to a style of play and this was the main issue with Hogan.

I’m not surprised he’s doing ok a Small Heath.
Can only benefit us when we sell at end of season.
I don't get the idea that he was played wrong or that we never played to his strengths. He never really showed much at all and good players adapt anyway. Smith obviously didn't rate him either and he for one certainly should've known any strengths.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37696
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1777 on: February 09, 2020, 07:12:40 PM »
To get the most of Hogan you needed to be playing a press so you won the ball back high up the pitch and could put him in on goal within a couple of passes. As soon as a defence gets organised he struggles to find space but he's a good finisher if he's not got much else to do other than get on the end of the ball in the box.

It's the sort of striker I can totally understand being incredibly successful at lower levels (bottom half of the championship at best) but he was never suited to the way Bruce played and was never going to be good enough when we were promoted.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89940
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1778 on: February 09, 2020, 07:23:28 PM »
He also wasn’t suitable for us under Smith, Sheffield United under Wilder, or Stoke under Jones or O’Neill. Two goals for Small Heath doesn’t change the fact that he is a shit, limited player.  He got 5 in 5 for us once, then scored once in the next 20 or so.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37696
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1779 on: February 09, 2020, 08:09:49 PM »
He also wasn’t suitable for us under Smith, Sheffield United under Wilder, or Stoke under Jones or O’Neill. Two goals for Small Heath doesn’t change the fact that he is a shit, limited player.  He got 5 in 5 for us once, then scored once in the next 20 or so.

Under Smith he didn't play because he was never going to be good enough to replace Tammy. He did ok at Sheff Utd and I think he could've worked in that squad. Stoke were a complete mess, they made Butland look like a pub player. None of this is excuses, I think he's a poor player who is probably now at the highest level his ability can go, but the play style issue is still true, if Bruce honestly watched him and couldn't see how poorly suited he was then it's yet more evidence that Bruce is delusional and doesn't see the limitation of his approach.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89940
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1780 on: February 09, 2020, 08:12:57 PM »
Oh I agree, I don't think Bruce's scouting extended to anything more than looking at the list of top scorers in the division. 

Offline nigel

  • Member
  • Posts: 5786
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1781 on: February 10, 2020, 07:15:35 PM »
He also wasn’t suitable for us under Smith, Sheffield United under Wilder, or Stoke under Jones or O’Neill. Two goals for Small Heath doesn’t change the fact that he is a shit, limited player.  He got 5 in 5 for us once, then scored once in the next 20 or so.

I’ve just read the first few pages of this thread 😂

Offline CT

  • Member
  • Posts: 7474
  • Location: Cheltenhamshire lalala
    • http://astonvilla.blogfootball.com/CT
  • GM : 11.02.2024
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1782 on: February 10, 2020, 07:53:04 PM »
He also wasn’t suitable for us under Smith, Sheffield United under Wilder, or Stoke under Jones or O’Neill. Two goals for Small Heath doesn’t change the fact that he is a shit, limited player.  He got 5 in 5 for us once, then scored once in the next 20 or so.

I’ve just read the first few pages of this thread 😂

Hairbandinho was scarily accurate with his comment!

Offline rougegorge

  • Member
  • Posts: 1629
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1783 on: February 11, 2020, 01:39:01 PM »
Oh I agree, I don't think Bruce's scouting extended to anything more than looking at the list of top scorers in the division.
Well there was only really Hogan that falls into this category; Lansbury to a degree.

However, whatever we may think about the tactics under Bruce, I think his good signings, including loanees, easily outweighed the negative ones.

Offline Jon Crofts

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21811
  • Location: Lost In The Supermarket
  • GM : PCM
Re: Scott Hogan - retired
« Reply #1784 on: February 11, 2020, 01:46:30 PM »
The absolute worst case scenario here is Hogan's goals keep them in The Championship.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal