collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Unai Emery by olaftab
[Today at 07:29:45 AM]


Ross Barkley by nordenvillain
[Today at 02:16:17 AM]


Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Matt C
[Today at 02:14:18 AM]


Europa League 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 02:01:46 AM]


Press-ing fourth by dave.woodhall
[Today at 12:19:37 AM]


Feyenoord vs Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by dcdavecollett
[Today at 12:09:12 AM]


Lamare Bogarde by paul_e
[October 06, 2025, 11:20:44 PM]


The week in claret and blue by dave.woodhall
[October 06, 2025, 11:00:40 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Unai Emery by olaftab
[Today at 07:29:45 AM]


Re: Unai Emery by Toronto Villa
[Today at 04:59:45 AM]


Re: Unai Emery by Rigadon
[Today at 04:38:58 AM]


Re: Ross Barkley by nordenvillain
[Today at 02:16:17 AM]


Re: Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Matt C
[Today at 02:14:18 AM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 02:01:46 AM]


Re: Ross Barkley by dcdavecollett
[Today at 12:56:28 AM]


Re: Press-ing fourth by dave.woodhall
[Today at 12:19:37 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Was Lerner just naive?  (Read 5653 times)

Offline Villa in Denmark

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12926
  • Age: 1025
  • Location: Lost
  • On a road to nowhere
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #30 on: March 16, 2016, 12:01:25 PM »
a well meaning but totally inept nincompoop - like something out of P G Wodehouse

Ha, yes.  Jeeves and Wooster.  Unfortunately without Wooster.

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #31 on: March 16, 2016, 12:02:43 PM »
and not much Jeeves

Offline Villa in Denmark

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12926
  • Age: 1025
  • Location: Lost
  • On a road to nowhere
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #32 on: March 16, 2016, 12:04:05 PM »
Oh B####CKS!

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #33 on: March 16, 2016, 12:05:42 PM »
Randy Blandings Lerner

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7409
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #34 on: March 16, 2016, 02:08:16 PM »
L plates. That should probably be the protest. Fox or 'Lerner out' isn't allowed apparently. So, everyone bring L plates. It's ambiguous enough that you shouldn't be thrown out of the ground for waving an L in the air but it would be pretty obvious what it meant. And easy for everyone to get one. I don't think this is a new idea but it's a good one.

Let me see your L's in the air.

L yeah  8)

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 34312
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #35 on: March 16, 2016, 02:50:44 PM »
"that had shown outstanding loyalty, the like of which he'd never seen before"...what type of loyalty did Lambert need to show? The type the rejects the advances of Blackburn Rovers and other Championship bottom-feeders?

I can't remember the (publicly known) details of Faulkner's departure. Was he happy to get out?

Offline Villa in Denmark

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12926
  • Age: 1025
  • Location: Lost
  • On a road to nowhere
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #36 on: March 16, 2016, 04:25:31 PM »
"that had shown outstanding loyalty, the like of which he'd never seen before"...what type of loyalty did Lambert need to show? The type the rejects the advances of Blackburn Rovers and other Championship bottom-feeders?

I can't remember the (publicly known) details of Faulkner's departure. Was he happy to get out?


I think the Lambert loyalty thing was some b/s in the aftermath of the Karsa / Culverhouse bullying saga. (i.e. he was happy to stick the boot into his mates to keep the job he wanted to be sacked from)

I'm not sure Faulkner was happy to go.  It looked like something that had been there in the background for a short while and was suddenly announced about 24 hours after he'd done that charity abseil off the roof of The Holte.

The Faulkner thing is purely my unsubstantiated theory. The Lambert quote may not be verbatim, but it's close and definitely that level of protectionism.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63598
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #37 on: March 16, 2016, 05:28:41 PM »
I think Faulkner was a combination of his relationship with Randy not being what it had been previously, a bit of personal and possibly he could see what was coming and didn't think it was worth the aggravation.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89940
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Was Lerner just naive?
« Reply #38 on: March 16, 2016, 05:38:35 PM »
I think Faulkner was a combination of his relationship with Randy not being what it had been previously, a bit of personal and possibly he could see what was coming and didn't think it was worth the aggravation.

I think that sounds right, and that the years of poor performance took its toll on their relationship. That's the problem of having a small board, when the shit starts to hit the fan the blame gets concentrated rather than spread around.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal