I appreciate that it's all paper talk but why appoint a new Manager before any takover, unless of course the new people also want Pearson? If so, where is their ambition and is this a sign of yet more crap ownership to come? Can we really not do better than Nigel Pearson? The season hasn't finished yet, I can put up with three more crap performances if we DO get the takeover sorted in the meantime, but Pearson? Really?
If, and I stress if, a takeover is imminent, and fwiw I think it is. Why would there be a managerial appointment when in all likelihood the new owner(s) wouldn't want him. Unless of course this has already been agreed beforehand by all parties.
Quote from: dave shelley on April 24, 2016, 11:04:37 AMIf, and I stress if, a takeover is imminent, and fwiw I think it is. Why would there be a managerial appointment when in all likelihood the new owner(s) wouldn't want him. Unless of course this has already been agreed beforehand by all parties.It happened with O'Neill?
I think it was interesting that Moyes said he was leaving it until the summer to decide about his next job. I (clutching at straws) took that to mean he may be waiting for a takeover to go through and he may then be in the frame as our next manager. He could of course just be waiting to see what options are open to him. If we appoint Pearson or someone like Grayson before any takeover goes through I think we can assume that the sale is just a paper talk/pipe dream[/quoteI'm coming round to this idea. Appoint a manager now and the takeover is far away in the distance.Just hope that there's a big announcement just around the corner.]
Would be great if the club did have some imagination. How did Southampton get Pocchetino (who I'd never heard of before he went there) and then they landed Koeman? And Leicester get Ranieri. We're scratching around with the same old list of maybes, although having said that I'd be very happy with Moyes