Gabby

[PeterWithesShin]

[Jimbo]

How many more grounds do we need to sack this tool? Overweight and unfit in April. Caught smoking shisha. Placed on fitness programme, which he disregards by having a laughing gas party. How much more untenable could Gabby's position be?*




*The answer is none. None more untenable.   

[Malandro]

He's trying to get sacked. Probably got a move to the US/China/Qatar lined up.

[Ron Manager]

But Lerner will not sack him because it might just might cost him a barrowload of money.

[Malandro]

But Lerner will not sack him because it might just might cost him a barrowload of money.

Probably, I don't think we have any grounds to sack him

[PeterWithe]

There is an opinion piece in the Mail from an employment lawyer saying he thinks there would be grounds for a written warning but not a sacking. Which is a shame.

[VinnieChase84]

There is an opinion piece in the Mail from an employment lawyer saying he thinks there would be grounds for a written warning but not a sacking. Which is a shame.

What if he's already had a written warning.....

[PeterWithe]

He should get another one, fella reckons there are no grounds for a sacking.

[Richard E]

There is an opinion piece in the Mail from an employment lawyer saying he thinks there would be grounds for a written warning but not a sacking. Which is a shame.

Bizarrely, it describes him as a "top UNemployment lawyer!"

I'm not sure we know enough to say that this is not gross misconduct or a dismissal matter.

If he is already subject to a current warning or was given an express instruction not to do certain things then it could be a sacking offence.

[CT]

That's a very flattering pic when he was 3 stone lighter.

[aj2k77]

You know when you are already pissed off about everything Villa and concerned about disappearing down the plug hole this little fat goon is an unwanted sideshow.

[chrisw1]

There is an opinion piece in the Mail from an employment lawyer saying he thinks there would be grounds for a written warning but not a sacking. Which is a shame.

Bizarrely, it describes him as a "top UNemployment lawyer!"

I'm not sure we know enough to say that this is not gross misconduct or a dismissal matter.

If he is already subject to a current warning or was given an express instruction not to do certain things then it could be a sacking offence.

We also don't know whether alcohol was involved and if so how much.  I'm sure the lawyers will be looking at it pretty closely.

[maidstonevillain]

There is an opinion piece in the Mail from an employment lawyer saying he thinks there would be grounds for a written warning but not a sacking. Which is a shame.

That is where the club cocked up.  He should have had a written warning already for Dubai.

[PeterWithe]

As our friend says above, maybe, hopefully, he did have.

[myf]

He should get another one, fella reckons there are no grounds for a sacking.

So what's the point in a written warning if there's no sanction of dismissal?