collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Evann Guessand by Somniloquism
[Today at 03:39:59 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 03:37:21 PM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by Somniloquism
[Today at 03:31:45 PM]


Pre season 2025 by martin o`who??
[Today at 03:09:47 PM]


Leander Dendoncker - on loan to Anderlecht by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 03:09:43 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by amfy
[Today at 03:06:36 PM]


Lucas Digne by cdbearsfan
[Today at 12:42:58 PM]


Zepiqueno Redmond by London Villan
[Today at 10:28:59 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Stoke away  (Read 13969 times)

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30211
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #30 on: January 26, 2016, 06:30:10 PM »
we could sell twice that amount , they dont want us there

Are you ever going to admit you're wrong about this?
no , they didnt , but they do now

You're being ridiculous. All this 'they don't want us there' is bordering on childish.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63314
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #31 on: January 26, 2016, 06:35:35 PM »
Is there any point in asking why they've suddenly changed their season-long habit of Not Wanting Us?

Offline conman

  • Member
  • Posts: 1465
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #32 on: January 26, 2016, 06:53:36 PM »
Is there any point in asking why they've suddenly changed their season-long habit of Not Wanting Us?
After Saturday they must of realised that a good away following can motivate the team to a better performance

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63314
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #33 on: January 26, 2016, 06:57:11 PM »
Is there any point in asking why they've suddenly changed their season-long habit of Not Wanting Us?
After Saturday they must of realised that a good away following can motivate the team to a better performance

Even taking into account that you've never explained why they actively didn't want to sell tickets, they've just had that blinding flash of inspiration - so great that it's overruled their previous idea of not wanting us at games -  now, rather than after, say, any other away match in the past fifty years?

Offline conman

  • Member
  • Posts: 1465
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #34 on: January 26, 2016, 06:58:41 PM »
Is there any point in asking why they've suddenly changed their season-long habit of Not Wanting Us?
After Saturday they must of realised that a good away following can motivate the team to a better performance

Even taking into account that you've never explained why they actively didn't want to sell tickets, they've just had that blinding flash of inspiration - so great that it's overruled their previous idea of not wanting us at games -  now, rather than after, say, any other away match in the past fifty years?
why did they give us  1600 at first then

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63314
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #35 on: January 26, 2016, 07:00:46 PM »
Is there any point in asking why they've suddenly changed their season-long habit of Not Wanting Us?
After Saturday they must of realised that a good away following can motivate the team to a better performance

Even taking into account that you've never explained why they actively didn't want to sell tickets, they've just had that blinding flash of inspiration - so great that it's overruled their previous idea of not wanting us at games -  now, rather than after, say, any other away match in the past fifty years?
why did they only take 1600 at first then

Sit down and I'll talk slowly. They took 1,600 because that's the minimum allocation. After selling them they realised the demand was there for the next batch so they had those as well.   

Offline conman

  • Member
  • Posts: 1465
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #36 on: January 26, 2016, 07:06:01 PM »
Is there any point in asking why they've suddenly changed their season-long habit of Not Wanting Us?
After Saturday they must of realised that a good away following can motivate the team to a better performance

Even taking into account that you've never explained why they actively didn't want to sell tickets, they've just had that blinding flash of inspiration - so great that it's overruled their previous idea of not wanting us at games -  now, rather than after, say, any other away match in the past fifty years?
why did they only take 1600 at first then

Sit down and I'll talk slowly. They took 1,600 because that's the minimum allocation. After selling them they realised the demand was there for the next batch so they had those as well.   
nonsense , it was obvious when they announced the price was £25 that the demand would be there for at least 3000

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63314
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #37 on: January 26, 2016, 07:09:50 PM »
Is there any point in asking why they've suddenly changed their season-long habit of Not Wanting Us?
After Saturday they must of realised that a good away following can motivate the team to a better performance

Even taking into account that you've never explained why they actively didn't want to sell tickets, they've just had that blinding flash of inspiration - so great that it's overruled their previous idea of not wanting us at games -  now, rather than after, say, any other away match in the past fifty years?
why did they only take 1600 at first then

Sit down and I'll talk slowly. They took 1,600 because that's the minimum allocation. After selling them they realised the demand was there for the next batch so they had those as well.   
nonsense , it was obvious when they announced the price was £25 that the demand would be there for at least 3000

And now they've got 3,000, or as near as makes no difference. Everyone's happy except you and your silly little Damascene conspiracy theory, for which you have still not provided an explanation although looking at your prevous posts that's probably just as well.

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #38 on: January 26, 2016, 07:11:59 PM »
It isn't working, Dave. File under loony you can't win with.

Offline conman

  • Member
  • Posts: 1465
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #39 on: January 26, 2016, 07:12:11 PM »
Is there any point in asking why they've suddenly changed their season-long habit of Not Wanting Us?
After Saturday they must of realised that a good away following can motivate the team to a better performance

Even taking into account that you've never explained why they actively didn't want to sell tickets, they've just had that blinding flash of inspiration - so great that it's overruled their previous idea of not wanting us at games -  now, rather than after, say, any other away match in the past fifty years?
why did they only take 1600 at first then

Sit down and I'll talk slowly. They took 1,600 because that's the minimum allocation. After selling them they realised the demand was there for the next batch so they had those as well.   
nonsense , it was obvious when they announced the price was £25 that the demand would be there for at least 3000

And now they've got 3,000, or as near as makes no difference. Everyone's happy except you and your silly little Damascene conspiracy theory, for which you have still not provided an explanation although looking at your prevous posts that's probably just as well.
I am happy with the increased allocation my previous post on the news was "Brilliant"

Offline leylandalbion

  • Member
  • Posts: 569
  • GM : 06.05.2015
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #40 on: January 26, 2016, 07:12:23 PM »
another factor is that the game will be moved if they get to LC final.
I managed to get 4 Monday with ST and 1 away on the initial allocation - so I would imagine still a few to shift.   Looking fwd to it anyway!

Offline conman

  • Member
  • Posts: 1465
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #41 on: January 26, 2016, 07:15:56 PM »
another factor is that the game will be moved if they get to LC final.
I managed to get 4 Monday with ST and 1 away on the initial allocation - so I would imagine still a few to shift.   Looking fwd to it anyway!
me too , hope liverpool win tonight

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42842
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #42 on: January 27, 2016, 11:20:22 AM »
Since 'The Mighty Reds YNWA' won, this is now on the Saturday.

However, you should be warned that this also means that Legion will now be in attendance.

If anyone has an armoured car or tank that I can borrow for the day, please let me know  ;)

Offline Andy1874

  • Member
  • Posts: 116
  • Location: South Birmingham
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #43 on: January 27, 2016, 11:40:54 AM »
I've also just purchased 4, be a good day.

Should sell out no problems, still got 4 weeks!

Offline joe_c

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 13478
  • Location: My secret hayloft, shot with shafts of afternoon sunlight
  • GM : 31.03.2020
Re: Stoke away
« Reply #44 on: January 27, 2016, 01:16:33 PM »
Since 'The Mighty Reds YNWA' won, this is now on the Saturday.

However, you should be warned that this also means that Legion will now be in attendance.

If anyone has an armoured car or tank that I can borrow for the day, please let me know  ;)

An armoured car? In the Potteries?



Feel free to skip to around the 1:30 mark if it proves 2 hardcore 4 u.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal