collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

FFP by Rory
[Today at 02:51:03 AM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:21:39 AM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by tomd2103
[Today at 02:17:53 AM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:24:38 AM]


Jacob Ramsey by Skipper_The_Eyechild
[Today at 12:48:47 AM]


Back in the old routine - Newcastle at home by dave.woodhall
[Today at 12:41:27 AM]


Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by olaftab
[Today at 12:41:21 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Skipper_The_Eyechild
[Today at 12:35:02 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: FFP by Rory
[Today at 02:51:03 AM]


Re: Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:21:39 AM]


Re: Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by tomd2103
[Today at 02:17:53 AM]


Re: FFP by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 02:07:31 AM]


Re: Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:24:38 AM]


Re: FFP by paul_e
[Today at 01:16:01 AM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by Skipper_The_Eyechild
[Today at 12:48:47 AM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by olaftab
[Today at 12:47:07 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Under Armour  (Read 174968 times)

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33771
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #255 on: June 07, 2016, 07:50:53 PM »
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

Pics or it didn't happen.

Offline Villa in Denmark

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12797
  • Age: 1025
  • Location: Lost
  • On a road to nowhere
  • GM : 25.09.2025
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #256 on: June 07, 2016, 07:55:11 PM »

Offline Pat McMahon

  • Member
  • Posts: 7238
  • Location: Shanghai - Blarney Stone for Villa games
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #257 on: June 07, 2016, 11:08:31 PM »
The '57 kit was our away kit

Yup yup. Both teams played in their away kit in the final.

Not exactly. Ours was a one-off.

A one-off away kit, if there's such a thing. in 56, Blues and Man City both wore away kits in the final. As did Everton and Albion in 68

FA rules stated that, if there was a colour clash, both sides would have to wear away kits

I had never bothered to think why Albion and Everton both wore away kits in 1968.. Also had always assumed our cup final kit was the regular away kit.

Offline Pete3206

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17952
  • Location: Erdington
  • GM : PCM
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #258 on: June 08, 2016, 12:37:13 AM »
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

Pics or it didn't happen.

http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/HistoryKits/

Offline itbrvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 7402
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : 16.02.2022
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #259 on: June 08, 2016, 08:02:59 AM »
The club provide a huge pack about colours and brand identity to the kit supplier and have done as far as I am aware since agreeing on the exact colours during the rebranding with Nike. Not sure how much leeway they get with it though but I liked the macron colours.

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10083
  • GM : 21.08.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #260 on: June 08, 2016, 08:25:19 AM »
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

Pics or it didn't happen.

Offline ADVILLAFAN

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13236
  • Location: Shirley
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #261 on: June 08, 2016, 08:38:01 AM »
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

Pics or it didn't happen.

http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/HistoryKits/

We basically played in Queens Park's kit for a season then.

Offline greenwichvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 2574
  • Location: Zero Degrees
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #262 on: June 08, 2016, 12:18:10 PM »
The '57 kit was our away kit

Yup yup. Both teams played in their away kit in the final.

Not exactly. Ours was a one-off.

according the notes underneath it, a one off indeed...

In December 1956 a new sky blue shirt was introduced. This was the first season that the club badge was worn on the shirts and culminated in an FA Cup win in 1957 when the team wore a dramatic pin striped shirt - apparently to provide sufficient contrast for TV coverage.


UTV
The Doc

AGAINST MODERN FOOTBALL

Offline edgysatsuma89

  • Member
  • Posts: 6581
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #263 on: June 08, 2016, 12:40:56 PM »
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37254
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #264 on: June 08, 2016, 12:48:43 PM »
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

The only kit I've bought for the last few years is the checked one and it's because I managed to get a version without the sponsor, looks much better without the genting logo across it.

Offline edgysatsuma89

  • Member
  • Posts: 6581
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #265 on: June 08, 2016, 12:51:41 PM »
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

The only kit I've bought for the last few years is the checked one and it's because I managed to get a version without the sponsor, looks much better without the genting logo across it.

How did you manage to get one without the sponsor?

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72707
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #266 on: June 08, 2016, 12:58:36 PM »
Maybe he washed it loads of times?

Offline edgysatsuma89

  • Member
  • Posts: 6581
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #267 on: June 08, 2016, 01:00:50 PM »
Maybe he washed it loads of times?

Ha. Tru say dat. I wonder if there is a decent way of removing it without leaving any marks? Steam the shit out of it?

Offline Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 14154
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Tipton
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #268 on: June 08, 2016, 01:03:56 PM »
Maybe he washed it loads of times?

Or even just once, if we are talking about the white and blackcurrant number from a couple of years ago.

Offline mattjpa

  • Member
  • Posts: 1756
  • Location: Middle Earth
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #269 on: June 08, 2016, 01:16:23 PM »
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

The only kit I've bought for the last few years is the checked one and it's because I managed to get a version without the sponsor, looks much better without the genting logo across it.

How did you manage to get one without the sponsor?

I was just about to say the same thing. It was the nike away checked one and there was about 3 weeks difference between the kit release date and the appointment of the sponsor (Genting at the time, i think) Eitherway, they ran a limited production at sports direct which you could then go and take to the club shop after and have the sponsor put on it, I would be gobsmacked if anyone did.

Heres an idea, they should offer a sponsorless shirt at a £10 premium. All extra over proceeds should be given back to quickbooks to give to their appointed charity. The extra good publicity generated would probably outweigh that gained from the logo on the shirt. Id certainly pay it anyway.

I may email the villa with that one..

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal