It's not Sherwood!

[AV89]

I see Paul Parker wants Tactics Tims to take over at United instead of José.... ...

[LeeB]

I see Paul Parker wants Tactics Tims to take over at United instead of José.... ...

So do I brother, so do I.

[john e]

I see Paul Parker wants Tactics Tims to take over at United instead of José.... ...

So do I brother, so do I.

hear hear

[Villa in Denmark]

Bloody hell.  If that comes true I might have to re-evaluate my views on a supreme being pulling the strings.

If he thought Gestede was the answer for £6M as a striker when he'd got a budget of over £50M for rebuildng a team, just think what he'll turn up for £30M when he's got £250M to spend!

[olaftab]

I see Paul Parker wants Tactics Tims to take over at United instead of José.... ...

I think he is good enough for them. He was just too big for us that's all.

[mr underhill]

the peter principle x 1 billion

[ZhongYi]

lazy question but is paul parker still doing the Yahoo! sports column? he used to get hammered on there.

as for thread - interesting how Sherwood (and also Lambert, McLeish) never seem to have a bad word to say about the stature of the club or the supporters. Think Sherwood deserves some credit for that to be fair when it would be easier and probably career enhancing for him to side with the anti-villa brigade that exists in the media - especially MOTD.

[leylandalbion]

He was on talkshite earlier.  Said that the villa fans were the best he had ever worked for. Very uncommitted on player sourcing  Danny someone introduced him by saying villa fans would not blame him one bit for our demise.

[class-of-82]

still think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it round
But we will never know

[Dave]

still think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it round
But we will never know

He definitely, definitely wouldn't.

[Witton Warrior]

still think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it round
But we will never know

He definitely, definitely wouldn't.

He may have convinced a couple of mercenaries to join in January but we would still be as stuffed as we are now IMHO

[Somniloquism]

still think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it round
But we will never know

The difference between him and Garde is that he worked the other side of the schism he helped create and still couldn't get players like Richards, Gabby and Lescott to play well.

[Tokyo Sexwhale]

still think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it round
But we will never know

He definitely, definitely wouldn't.

He may have convinced a couple of mercenaries to join in January but we would still be as stuffed as we are now IMHO

I don't know  - I somehow think he might have eked out a couple more wins than Garde has done.  2 more wins, or the equivalent in points, would mean we're still in the mix.

[Dante Lavelli]

still think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it round
But we will never know

He definitely, definitely wouldn't.

He may have convinced a couple of mercenaries to join in January but we would still be as stuffed as we are now IMHO

I don't know  - I somehow think he might have eked out a couple more wins than Garde has done.  2 more wins, or the equivalent in points, would mean we're still in the mix.

What maths have you used there considering the run we were on before Garde was appointed?

[Stirchley Villain]

still think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it round
But we will never know

The difference between him and Garde is that he worked the other side of the schism he helped create and still couldn't get players like Richards, Gabby and Lescott to play well.

In what context are you using the word "schism?"