Quote from: silhillvilla on October 24, 2015, 09:19:27 AMGED had to be coaxed into coming too I recall.if you are referring to Houllier, then you are correct. He had concerns about his health and being too old, all of which proved to be correct. I think he had an easy and cushy role at the French FA which he was reluctant to give up. he should have stayed in Paris
GED had to be coaxed into coming too I recall.
lf he had taken a sensible tactical approach this season and stuck with a formation and set of players to deliver i would have sympathy.if he had made changes to protect the lead i would have had sympathy. If he had done more to change it when it wasn't working against Sunderland i would have sympathy. If he had not started a totally shambolic side against Notts in the cup i would .... But he did. Lerner is an issue no doubt but this guy had the tools to be easily outside the bottom 3. Just rubbish. He has to go. ASAP
Quote from: Rudy65 on October 24, 2015, 09:44:19 AMQuote from: silhillvilla on October 24, 2015, 09:19:27 AMGED had to be coaxed into coming too I recall.if you are referring to Houllier, then you are correct. He had concerns about his health and being too old, all of which proved to be correct. I think he had an easy and cushy role at the French FA which he was reluctant to give up. he should have stayed in ParisPlease tell me this is untrue.
Quote from: ozzjim on October 25, 2015, 08:09:21 AMlf he had taken a sensible tactical approach this season and stuck with a formation and set of players to deliver i would have sympathy.if he had made changes to protect the lead i would have had sympathy. If he had done more to change it when it wasn't working against Sunderland i would have sympathy. If he had not started a totally shambolic side against Notts in the cup i would .... But he did. Lerner is an issue no doubt but this guy had the tools to be easily outside the bottom 3. Just rubbish. He has to go. ASAPAnd, he admitted as much in the article from the Grauniad yesterday, where he admitted that he was still trying to find the right formula. For me, he has committed the same 'offence' as TSMII, by isolating certain players - Veretout and Kozak, for example - and favouring others.Yesterday's team was another bizarre selection, where again the central MF always looked too light from the start ... and particularly after we took the lead.He is a nonce. End of.
Quote from: Mister E on October 25, 2015, 08:35:43 AMQuote from: ozzjim on October 25, 2015, 08:09:21 AMlf he had taken a sensible tactical approach this season and stuck with a formation and set of players to deliver i would have sympathy.if he had made changes to protect the lead i would have had sympathy. If he had done more to change it when it wasn't working against Sunderland i would have sympathy. If he had not started a totally shambolic side against Notts in the cup i would .... But he did. Lerner is an issue no doubt but this guy had the tools to be easily outside the bottom 3. Just rubbish. He has to go. ASAPAnd, he admitted as much in the article from the Grauniad yesterday, where he admitted that he was still trying to find the right formula. For me, he has committed the same 'offence' as TSMII, by isolating certain players - Veretout and Kozak, for example - and favouring others.Yesterday's team was another bizarre selection, where again the central MF always looked too light from the start ... and particularly after we took the lead.Even when we took the lead, Shelvey was walking at our back 4 behind our 1 recognised centre mid way too often. Bacuna did well in fairness with Gueye, but there needed to be another centre mid in there as soon as we edged in front.
Quote from: ozzjim on October 25, 2015, 08:09:21 AMlf he had taken a sensible tactical approach this season and stuck with a formation and set of players to deliver i would have sympathy.if he had made changes to protect the lead i would have had sympathy. If he had done more to change it when it wasn't working against Sunderland i would have sympathy. If he had not started a totally shambolic side against Notts in the cup i would .... But he did. Lerner is an issue no doubt but this guy had the tools to be easily outside the bottom 3. Just rubbish. He has to go. ASAPAnd, he admitted as much in the article from the Grauniad yesterday, where he admitted that he was still trying to find the right formula. For me, he has committed the same 'offence' as TSMII, by isolating certain players - Veretout and Kozak, for example - and favouring others.Yesterday's team was another bizarre selection, where again the central MF always looked too light from the start ... and particularly after we took the lead.
Quote from: rob_bridge on October 25, 2015, 08:17:25 AMQuote from: Rudy65 on October 24, 2015, 09:44:19 AMQuote from: silhillvilla on October 24, 2015, 09:19:27 AMGED had to be coaxed into coming too I recall.if you are referring to Houllier, then you are correct. He had concerns about his health and being too old, all of which proved to be correct. I think he had an easy and cushy role at the French FA which he was reluctant to give up. he should have stayed in ParisPlease tell me this is untrue. Houlliers heart condition was nothing to do with stress, though, it was congenital.