Was it just how it seemed to me or when you were saying the last bit that basically criticised what the PL has become they didn't seem as interested?
Is this a protest for just the Holte end or can the other stands take part ?
Seemed to be an audible tut from Bobby Gould when PL's inconsistency was raised. Managers' union...
Well I'm going tomorrow and I will watch for 90 minutes. If anyone wants to do this protest then good luck to them, but ID rather do protest after the game. I don't like the managers tactics, but I'll support them for the whole game.No doubt if we score in the first 8 minutes then people will start scurrying back in. It'll probably be the first time a football crowd has chanted "we can see you sneaking in".
So let me get this right, the protest is directed at Lerner to leave even though he has intimated that he would like to sell up and leave.
snip good stuff
The problem with protests like this one is that the emotions that make them necessary – the overwhelming frustration, anger and desperation many of us feel – are exactly the sort of emotions that lead to poor judgment and ill-conceived ideas. It’s sort of perverse but planning a successful angry protest requires a dispassionate and detached approach. Otherwise you end up with something like this farce, an idea so half-baked it’s still runny in the middle.And I’d say that’s being kind. I’m going to have to assume (as I’m not entirely sure) that the immediate aim of this Huge, Pointed Lateness is to oust Lambert from his dugout. In which case, I think whoever mooted this protest could barely have done a worse job; it’s muddled, contradictory and objectionable, and it’s so far off target I wonder if Tonev has had more influence than we realise. Making the completely spurious “eight minutes” its focus takes all the attention away from the really pertinent issues at hand and plays straight into the hands of our detractors, and alienates people whose support and influence will be essential if Lambert is to be sent packing.It gives opposition fans and media the chance to accuse us of ungratefulness, to justifiably point at the enormous amount of money Lerner’s poured in over eight years, to brand us fickle again, to suggest we have a sense of entitlement, that we want the moon on a stick. It forces lazy pundits to have a cursory glance over our record of the last eight years and draw the obvious and correct conclusion that Lambert’s had relatively little to spend. It attacks Randy (the man with the power to grant the protestors’ wish), giving him a reason to assume that it’s mostly about money (it can’t be about Lambert, otherwise they’d be targeting him wouldn’t they? Surely the mass entrance would be on the symbolic nil minutes). In which case, it gives him too cause to deem us ungrateful, maybe even to dig his heels in. (I have no idea what his mindset is, but I do know that slagging someone off unfairly is not usually a good way of getting them to do what you want). And he’s trying to sell anyway, we know that. We want him out, so does he. What are we, thick? And, most ridiculously of all (if ousting Lambert is the aim), it deflects blame from Lambert. It paints him a victim of mitigating circumstances and throws the spotlight off his management and onto his chairman. He must be bloody delighted. Way to go, organisers! What next? A plan to rid the world of Dairylea Triangles by telling everyone that Laughing Cow is poisonous? And that’s just the eight-minute thing; that’s without even mentioning vacuous statements like “We want our Villa back”, a deluded plea that is so ambiguous it ultimately means nothing at all. If Spurs fans came out with that we’d have a thread to mock them. What Villa is this we want back? If it’s any Villa, I’ll have the one of the late 1800s; plenty of success, and Chelsea didn’t exist. As campaign slogans go, it’s toothless. It’s merely a set-up, waiting for rival fans to provide the punchline. Protests during matches always divide opinion (and, as we’ve seen, cause confrontation) so the whole issue is thorny. I do see a need for a demonstration of some sort and share a lot of the concerns, but the debate surrounding this idea shows that it is surely too flaky to have the desired effect. I may be proved wrong, but rather than a rousing show of solidarity for a common cause I’m expecting a pitiful and probably tetchy display which sends out the confusing message that the Villa fans are very cross about something but they haven’t quite agreed on what it is yet. If it wasn’t so embarrassing I’d probably be amused by the irony that a campaign to oust a poor manager was so poorly managed. Before anyone shoots me down for slagging this protest off without offering any constructive alternative, here’s my constructive alternative: Support the team loudly, passionately and as vociferously as you have ever done, for ninety-odd minutes, and make Villa Park bounce, whatever the result, whatever the performance. Have every journalist, every away fan, every pundit and every television viewer looking on and thinking our brilliant support deserves so much better than we’ve been getting. The press are already starting to see that, and if things go on as they are, the pressure will eventually take its toll. Something has to give. It would be a relief if it did.
Quote from: Chinchilla Bathhouse on January 17, 2015, 02:17:12 AMsnip good stuffDropping some truth bombs right there.