Unchanged 12 for the last test so it looks like Compton stays for now. Wonder if they give Ball a go for Finn? Doubt they'll drop Woakes after that first innings spell of 3-9.
Quote from: Dave Cooper please on May 31, 2016, 11:57:02 AMUnchanged 12 for the last test so it looks like Compton stays for now. Wonder if they give Ball a go for Finn? Doubt they'll drop Woakes after that first innings spell of 3-9.I'd definitely keep Finn in. He's had two poor Test matches, but he's a quality bowler and he needs to be persevered with.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on June 03, 2016, 02:17:04 PMQuote from: Dave Cooper please on May 31, 2016, 11:57:02 AMUnchanged 12 for the last test so it looks like Compton stays for now. Wonder if they give Ball a go for Finn? Doubt they'll drop Woakes after that first innings spell of 3-9.I'd definitely keep Finn in. He's had two poor Test matches, but he's a quality bowler and he needs to be persevered with.That's true but it's a dead rubber at Lord's and it's a great time to blood a youngster. Maybe rest Jimmy ?
I don't think you should blood players in Tests. My view is that Finn is quality and should play. Jimmy won't want to be rested, he doesn't play the other forms now. If Ball has it he'll get in sooner or later.
Really enjoyed that England in the 90s doc I must say.Although I'm still in the minority that would rather see my team win the Championship than see England do well!
Quote from: PaulWinch again on June 03, 2016, 02:17:04 PMQuote from: Dave Cooper please on May 31, 2016, 11:57:02 AMUnchanged 12 for the last test so it looks like Compton stays for now. Wonder if they give Ball a go for Finn? Doubt they'll drop Woakes after that first innings spell of 3-9.I'd definitely keep Finn in. He's had two poor Test matches, but he's a quality bowler and he needs to be persevered with.Agree. Have you seen the 'England in the 90's' documentary on SKY? Many of those interviewed said it was the constant chopping and changing that undermined the confidence of certain players. Finn smacks me as the kind of player who could suffer a loss of confidence in those kind of circumstances.
Quote from: cdbullyweefan on June 04, 2016, 11:12:13 AMReally enjoyed that England in the 90s doc I must say.Although I'm still in the minority that would rather see my team win the Championship than see England do well!For me club/county always come before country in any sport.
Quote from: tomd2103 on June 04, 2016, 10:53:24 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on June 03, 2016, 02:17:04 PMQuote from: Dave Cooper please on May 31, 2016, 11:57:02 AMUnchanged 12 for the last test so it looks like Compton stays for now. Wonder if they give Ball a go for Finn? Doubt they'll drop Woakes after that first innings spell of 3-9.I'd definitely keep Finn in. He's had two poor Test matches, but he's a quality bowler and he needs to be persevered with.Agree. Have you seen the 'England in the 90's' documentary on SKY? Many of those interviewed said it was the constant chopping and changing that undermined the confidence of certain players. Finn smacks me as the kind of player who could suffer a loss of confidence in those kind of circumstances.Finn, except for one short spell, bowled some awful stuff in the last test, and it's wouldn't be "chopping and changing" it would be giving a player a debut at Test level in a game where he's not under massive pressure. I like Finn, but he's currently the weakest of our pace attack given the way Woakes bowled, there's got to be a time when the weakest in any position is dropped to give others a chance or we are not going to be able to move forward. See also Compton, I'm a bit disappointed not to see him dropped for this Test, it's not like he's going to be the future of England cricket is it? Blood one of Lions.
Quote from: Dave Cooper please on June 05, 2016, 08:02:25 PMQuote from: tomd2103 on June 04, 2016, 10:53:24 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on June 03, 2016, 02:17:04 PMQuote from: Dave Cooper please on May 31, 2016, 11:57:02 AMUnchanged 12 for the last test so it looks like Compton stays for now. Wonder if they give Ball a go for Finn? Doubt they'll drop Woakes after that first innings spell of 3-9.I'd definitely keep Finn in. He's had two poor Test matches, but he's a quality bowler and he needs to be persevered with.Agree. Have you seen the 'England in the 90's' documentary on SKY? Many of those interviewed said it was the constant chopping and changing that undermined the confidence of certain players. Finn smacks me as the kind of player who could suffer a loss of confidence in those kind of circumstances.Finn, except for one short spell, bowled some awful stuff in the last test, and it's wouldn't be "chopping and changing" it would be giving a player a debut at Test level in a game where he's not under massive pressure. I like Finn, but he's currently the weakest of our pace attack given the way Woakes bowled, there's got to be a time when the weakest in any position is dropped to give others a chance or we are not going to be able to move forward. See also Compton, I'm a bit disappointed not to see him dropped for this Test, it's not like he's going to be the future of England cricket is it? Blood one of Lions.Finn and Compton are completely different though. Finn is and has been a world class bowler, as recently as the tour of South Africa. Once he is in rhythm he is a devastating strike bowler, you don't discard that after two poor games. There have been points in their career where Anderson and Broad were diabolical, but perseverance got them through it. Compton has never proven he's anything more than a good county player.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on June 05, 2016, 08:50:12 PMQuote from: Dave Cooper please on June 05, 2016, 08:02:25 PMQuote from: tomd2103 on June 04, 2016, 10:53:24 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on June 03, 2016, 02:17:04 PMQuote from: Dave Cooper please on May 31, 2016, 11:57:02 AMUnchanged 12 for the last test so it looks like Compton stays for now. Wonder if they give Ball a go for Finn? Doubt they'll drop Woakes after that first innings spell of 3-9.I'd definitely keep Finn in. He's had two poor Test matches, but he's a quality bowler and he needs to be persevered with.Agree. Have you seen the 'England in the 90's' documentary on SKY? Many of those interviewed said it was the constant chopping and changing that undermined the confidence of certain players. Finn smacks me as the kind of player who could suffer a loss of confidence in those kind of circumstances.Finn, except for one short spell, bowled some awful stuff in the last test, and it's wouldn't be "chopping and changing" it would be giving a player a debut at Test level in a game where he's not under massive pressure. I like Finn, but he's currently the weakest of our pace attack given the way Woakes bowled, there's got to be a time when the weakest in any position is dropped to give others a chance or we are not going to be able to move forward. See also Compton, I'm a bit disappointed not to see him dropped for this Test, it's not like he's going to be the future of England cricket is it? Blood one of Lions.Finn and Compton are completely different though. Finn is and has been a world class bowler, as recently as the tour of South Africa. Once he is in rhythm he is a devastating strike bowler, you don't discard that after two poor games. There have been points in their career where Anderson and Broad were diabolical, but perseverance got them through it. Compton has never proven he's anything more than a good county player. The only thing I'd say against that is that Finn is slow right now (he should have been easily the quickest of the 4) so it really depends on what is causing that, if it's just purely lack of rhythm then maybe an extra week with his county might have been a better idea but carrying drinks would do him no good. Personally I would have gone with 'rested' and left him out of the 12 and called up borthwick as well. that gives a seamer and a spinner so we can suggest it's picking based on the track but it also gives us another middle order batsman so we can put some pressure on Compton as well.