Quote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:20:52 PMQuote from: jcsutv on June 20, 2014, 04:15:17 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:06:53 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:03:58 PMI respect trying to run things on a budgit but you have to get the right balance between that and actually moving the team forward on the football pitch, and at the moment we don't seem to be getting that balance. If we go down that is not going to be good for business surely.The point about us and West Brom is that awhile ago certain people on this board claimed that Lescott was an unrealistic target for Villa, but that West Brom have signed him surely shows than if wanted him we may well have got him. The guy just wants to play football at the top level.Maybe that's the reason - they've guaranteed him that he'll be first choice, we're going with Okore and Vlaar.I agree. Vlaar and Okore with Senderos as back up is a move in the right direction. Well we still don't know about Okore but I am willing to give him a chance. But Dave made my point for me, because we should be offering someone like Lescott first team football as it would improve our defence in the present, we can still develop the younger players at the same time.You still haven't said what the difference is you can see between us and a team that finished below us last season and whose supporters are protesting about their new manager.
Quote from: jcsutv on June 20, 2014, 04:15:17 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:06:53 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:03:58 PMI respect trying to run things on a budgit but you have to get the right balance between that and actually moving the team forward on the football pitch, and at the moment we don't seem to be getting that balance. If we go down that is not going to be good for business surely.The point about us and West Brom is that awhile ago certain people on this board claimed that Lescott was an unrealistic target for Villa, but that West Brom have signed him surely shows than if wanted him we may well have got him. The guy just wants to play football at the top level.Maybe that's the reason - they've guaranteed him that he'll be first choice, we're going with Okore and Vlaar.I agree. Vlaar and Okore with Senderos as back up is a move in the right direction. Well we still don't know about Okore but I am willing to give him a chance. But Dave made my point for me, because we should be offering someone like Lescott first team football as it would improve our defence in the present, we can still develop the younger players at the same time.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:06:53 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:03:58 PMI respect trying to run things on a budgit but you have to get the right balance between that and actually moving the team forward on the football pitch, and at the moment we don't seem to be getting that balance. If we go down that is not going to be good for business surely.The point about us and West Brom is that awhile ago certain people on this board claimed that Lescott was an unrealistic target for Villa, but that West Brom have signed him surely shows than if wanted him we may well have got him. The guy just wants to play football at the top level.Maybe that's the reason - they've guaranteed him that he'll be first choice, we're going with Okore and Vlaar.I agree. Vlaar and Okore with Senderos as back up is a move in the right direction.
Quote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:03:58 PMI respect trying to run things on a budgit but you have to get the right balance between that and actually moving the team forward on the football pitch, and at the moment we don't seem to be getting that balance. If we go down that is not going to be good for business surely.The point about us and West Brom is that awhile ago certain people on this board claimed that Lescott was an unrealistic target for Villa, but that West Brom have signed him surely shows than if wanted him we may well have got him. The guy just wants to play football at the top level.Maybe that's the reason - they've guaranteed him that he'll be first choice, we're going with Okore and Vlaar.
I respect trying to run things on a budgit but you have to get the right balance between that and actually moving the team forward on the football pitch, and at the moment we don't seem to be getting that balance. If we go down that is not going to be good for business surely.The point about us and West Brom is that awhile ago certain people on this board claimed that Lescott was an unrealistic target for Villa, but that West Brom have signed him surely shows than if wanted him we may well have got him. The guy just wants to play football at the top level.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:30:19 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:20:52 PMQuote from: jcsutv on June 20, 2014, 04:15:17 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:06:53 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:03:58 PMI respect trying to run things on a budgit but you have to get the right balance between that and actually moving the team forward on the football pitch, and at the moment we don't seem to be getting that balance. If we go down that is not going to be good for business surely.The point about us and West Brom is that awhile ago certain people on this board claimed that Lescott was an unrealistic target for Villa, but that West Brom have signed him surely shows than if wanted him we may well have got him. The guy just wants to play football at the top level.Maybe that's the reason - they've guaranteed him that he'll be first choice, we're going with Okore and Vlaar.I agree. Vlaar and Okore with Senderos as back up is a move in the right direction. Well we still don't know about Okore but I am willing to give him a chance. But Dave made my point for me, because we should be offering someone like Lescott first team football as it would improve our defence in the present, we can still develop the younger players at the same time.You still haven't said what the difference is you can see between us and a team that finished below us last season and whose supporters are protesting about their new manager.At the moment very little, but that is partly my point because them signing Lescott is far more ambitious than who we have signed. If they can get a decent ten goal a season striker (don't know why they let Long go) then I fancy their chances more than ours right now.
Quote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:36:33 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:30:19 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:20:52 PMQuote from: jcsutv on June 20, 2014, 04:15:17 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:06:53 PMQuote from: Gregorys Boy on June 20, 2014, 04:03:58 PMI respect trying to run things on a budgit but you have to get the right balance between that and actually moving the team forward on the football pitch, and at the moment we don't seem to be getting that balance. If we go down that is not going to be good for business surely.The point about us and West Brom is that awhile ago certain people on this board claimed that Lescott was an unrealistic target for Villa, but that West Brom have signed him surely shows than if wanted him we may well have got him. The guy just wants to play football at the top level.Maybe that's the reason - they've guaranteed him that he'll be first choice, we're going with Okore and Vlaar.I agree. Vlaar and Okore with Senderos as back up is a move in the right direction. Well we still don't know about Okore but I am willing to give him a chance. But Dave made my point for me, because we should be offering someone like Lescott first team football as it would improve our defence in the present, we can still develop the younger players at the same time.You still haven't said what the difference is you can see between us and a team that finished below us last season and whose supporters are protesting about their new manager.At the moment very little, but that is partly my point because them signing Lescott is far more ambitious than who we have signed. If they can get a decent ten goal a season striker (don't know why they let Long go) then I fancy their chances more than ours right now.One minute you're saying there's a difference, now you're saying there isn't, but there will be if they sign more players. You could say that about anyone.
No that is not what I said at all. I said that with signings like Lescott the future would look brighter for WBA than for us. The way football is we could have a decent season and they might go down, but I am just saying than that sort of player would have been a good signing for us. I have never rated Senderos, so with the exception of more experience I don't know what he brings to the team.
You said, "That West Brom have got him and we have settled for Senderos just shows the difference between the two clubs right now." Not in the future, or potentially, but now.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:50:42 PMYou said, "That West Brom have got him and we have settled for Senderos just shows the difference between the two clubs right now." Not in the future, or potentially, but now.They paid the higher salary to get the better player. That's a fairly clear difference isn't it?
Quote from: RussellC on June 20, 2014, 04:55:46 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:50:42 PMYou said, "That West Brom have got him and we have settled for Senderos just shows the difference between the two clubs right now." Not in the future, or potentially, but now.They paid the higher salary to get the better player. That's a fairly clear difference isn't it?Not in the slightest, not least because you don't know what they're paying or what the criteria for the two players are.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:57:37 PMQuote from: RussellC on June 20, 2014, 04:55:46 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 20, 2014, 04:50:42 PMYou said, "That West Brom have got him and we have settled for Senderos just shows the difference between the two clubs right now." Not in the future, or potentially, but now.They paid the higher salary to get the better player. That's a fairly clear difference isn't it?Not in the slightest, not least because you don't know what they're paying or what the criteria for the two players are.I can't think of any criteria that would make Senderos a better signing that Lescott. If it's age and finance then I would honestly rather we just stuck with the 4 centre-backs we currently have.
A lot of you seem to be very calm and relaxed about the club at the moment. You must all be seeing things very differently to me. I'm all for "seeing what happens over the rest of the summer" but the signs are that the majority of the clubs around us will be dipping into their newly acquired TV cash, whilst we'll be looking to fill the holes in our already sub-standard squad with bargain-bin options.