How did Woakes bowl?
Quote from: ACVilla on August 09, 2014, 08:14:23 PMHow did Woakes bowl?Averagely, he's still too expensive. But he'll get there, it's good that England have some real quality in Broad, Anderson and now Ali because it will allow the likes of Woakes and Jordan to get up to Test level in their own time. Look how long it took Anderson to finally look like a Test bowler, plenty were writing him off in the early days.
Quote from: Plumbutt Cooper on August 09, 2014, 10:14:04 PMQuote from: ACVilla on August 09, 2014, 08:14:23 PMHow did Woakes bowl?Averagely, he's still too expensive. But he'll get there, it's good that England have some real quality in Broad, Anderson and now Ali because it will allow the likes of Woakes and Jordan to get up to Test level in their own time. Look how long it took Anderson to finally look like a Test bowler, plenty were writing him off in the early days.I think the ECB had a role in Anderson's early struggles. He burst onto the scene with pace and accuracy. He looked a bit odd as his head was looking down as he delivered the ball, so the experts tried to change him. It was only when he went back to his natural technique that he became the world class operator he is.
Quote from: taylorsworkrate on August 09, 2014, 10:18:24 PMQuote from: Plumbutt Cooper on August 09, 2014, 10:14:04 PMQuote from: ACVilla on August 09, 2014, 08:14:23 PMHow did Woakes bowl?Averagely, he's still too expensive. But he'll get there, it's good that England have some real quality in Broad, Anderson and now Ali because it will allow the likes of Woakes and Jordan to get up to Test level in their own time. Look how long it took Anderson to finally look like a Test bowler, plenty were writing him off in the early days.I think the ECB had a role in Anderson's early struggles. He burst onto the scene with pace and accuracy. He looked a bit odd as his head was looking down as he delivered the ball, so the experts tried to change him. It was only when he went back to his natural technique that he became the world class operator he is.I think Woakes is a bit of a work in progress, he's added a good amount of pace in the last year and he's been working on adding an inswinger. Once he gets that in the bag and can concentrate on accuracy hell be a good bowler, I'd keep him in for the next test, in fact I wouldn't change the team (other than Finn for Broad if his broken nose keeps him out), the confidence could be pretty fragile so I'd rather not risk it by changing things.
Quote from: paul_e on August 09, 2014, 10:45:37 PMQuote from: taylorsworkrate on August 09, 2014, 10:18:24 PMQuote from: Plumbutt Cooper on August 09, 2014, 10:14:04 PMQuote from: ACVilla on August 09, 2014, 08:14:23 PMHow did Woakes bowl?Averagely, he's still too expensive. But he'll get there, it's good that England have some real quality in Broad, Anderson and now Ali because it will allow the likes of Woakes and Jordan to get up to Test level in their own time. Look how long it took Anderson to finally look like a Test bowler, plenty were writing him off in the early days.I think the ECB had a role in Anderson's early struggles. He burst onto the scene with pace and accuracy. He looked a bit odd as his head was looking down as he delivered the ball, so the experts tried to change him. It was only when he went back to his natural technique that he became the world class operator he is.I think Woakes is a bit of a work in progress, he's added a good amount of pace in the last year and he's been working on adding an inswinger. Once he gets that in the bag and can concentrate on accuracy hell be a good bowler, I'd keep him in for the next test, in fact I wouldn't change the team (other than Finn for Broad if his broken nose keeps him out), the confidence could be pretty fragile so I'd rather not risk it by changing things.Agree that if Broad is fit then the team should be unchanged for The Oval. Going forward, I don't know if there will be room in the team for Woakes and Jordan, especially if Finn finds some form.
Quote from: tomd2103 on August 10, 2014, 12:07:31 AMQuote from: paul_e on August 09, 2014, 10:45:37 PMQuote from: taylorsworkrate on August 09, 2014, 10:18:24 PMQuote from: Plumbutt Cooper on August 09, 2014, 10:14:04 PMQuote from: ACVilla on August 09, 2014, 08:14:23 PMHow did Woakes bowl?Averagely, he's still too expensive. But he'll get there, it's good that England have some real quality in Broad, Anderson and now Ali because it will allow the likes of Woakes and Jordan to get up to Test level in their own time. Look how long it took Anderson to finally look like a Test bowler, plenty were writing him off in the early days.I think the ECB had a role in Anderson's early struggles. He burst onto the scene with pace and accuracy. He looked a bit odd as his head was looking down as he delivered the ball, so the experts tried to change him. It was only when he went back to his natural technique that he became the world class operator he is.I think Woakes is a bit of a work in progress, he's added a good amount of pace in the last year and he's been working on adding an inswinger. Once he gets that in the bag and can concentrate on accuracy hell be a good bowler, I'd keep him in for the next test, in fact I wouldn't change the team (other than Finn for Broad if his broken nose keeps him out), the confidence could be pretty fragile so I'd rather not risk it by changing things.Agree that if Broad is fit then the team should be unchanged for The Oval. Going forward, I don't know if there will be room in the team for Woakes and Jordan, especially if Finn finds some form. A fit and firing Finn would be a definite pick.
Quote from: taylorsworkrate on August 10, 2014, 12:18:29 AMQuote from: tomd2103 on August 10, 2014, 12:07:31 AMQuote from: paul_e on August 09, 2014, 10:45:37 PMQuote from: taylorsworkrate on August 09, 2014, 10:18:24 PMQuote from: Plumbutt Cooper on August 09, 2014, 10:14:04 PMQuote from: ACVilla on August 09, 2014, 08:14:23 PMHow did Woakes bowl?Averagely, he's still too expensive. But he'll get there, it's good that England have some real quality in Broad, Anderson and now Ali because it will allow the likes of Woakes and Jordan to get up to Test level in their own time. Look how long it took Anderson to finally look like a Test bowler, plenty were writing him off in the early days.I think the ECB had a role in Anderson's early struggles. He burst onto the scene with pace and accuracy. He looked a bit odd as his head was looking down as he delivered the ball, so the experts tried to change him. It was only when he went back to his natural technique that he became the world class operator he is.I think Woakes is a bit of a work in progress, he's added a good amount of pace in the last year and he's been working on adding an inswinger. Once he gets that in the bag and can concentrate on accuracy hell be a good bowler, I'd keep him in for the next test, in fact I wouldn't change the team (other than Finn for Broad if his broken nose keeps him out), the confidence could be pretty fragile so I'd rather not risk it by changing things.Agree that if Broad is fit then the team should be unchanged for The Oval. Going forward, I don't know if there will be room in the team for Woakes and Jordan, especially if Finn finds some form. A fit and firing Finn would be a definite pick.Nah, stick with Woakes and Jordan - they still have plenty of time and both are good batsmen. Finn is too inconsistent.
Quote from: Villafirst on August 10, 2014, 11:38:25 AMQuote from: taylorsworkrate on August 10, 2014, 12:18:29 AMQuote from: tomd2103 on August 10, 2014, 12:07:31 AMQuote from: paul_e on August 09, 2014, 10:45:37 PMQuote from: taylorsworkrate on August 09, 2014, 10:18:24 PMQuote from: Plumbutt Cooper on August 09, 2014, 10:14:04 PMQuote from: ACVilla on August 09, 2014, 08:14:23 PMHow did Woakes bowl?Averagely, he's still too expensive. But he'll get there, it's good that England have some real quality in Broad, Anderson and now Ali because it will allow the likes of Woakes and Jordan to get up to Test level in their own time. Look how long it took Anderson to finally look like a Test bowler, plenty were writing him off in the early days.I think the ECB had a role in Anderson's early struggles. He burst onto the scene with pace and accuracy. He looked a bit odd as his head was looking down as he delivered the ball, so the experts tried to change him. It was only when he went back to his natural technique that he became the world class operator he is.I think Woakes is a bit of a work in progress, he's added a good amount of pace in the last year and he's been working on adding an inswinger. Once he gets that in the bag and can concentrate on accuracy hell be a good bowler, I'd keep him in for the next test, in fact I wouldn't change the team (other than Finn for Broad if his broken nose keeps him out), the confidence could be pretty fragile so I'd rather not risk it by changing things.Agree that if Broad is fit then the team should be unchanged for The Oval. Going forward, I don't know if there will be room in the team for Woakes and Jordan, especially if Finn finds some form. A fit and firing Finn would be a definite pick.Nah, stick with Woakes and Jordan - they still have plenty of time and both are good batsmen. Finn is too inconsistent.That's what I meant by firing. Finn at his best is a much better bowler than both of Woakes and Jordan at their best.Having a long batting line up is one thing, but you need to be able to take 20 wickets.